US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Surprise only 25 years of autonomy for reactors not 50 !

Ford Aircraft Carriers Designed with Midlife Refuelings Planned

The Navy’s new class of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers will need midlife refuelings and overhauls much like those performed on the older Nimitz-class carriers, a senior Navy admiral said.

“The Ford class is designed for midlife refueling as well,” Vice Adm. Thomas Moore, commander, Naval Sea Systems Command, said in an answer to a question from Seapower.

Moore said that while designing a nuclear reactor to last the entire 50-year life of the ship was “technically feasible, it didn’t make sense from a cost standpoint. When you keep a ship 50 years you’ve got to bring it in to a midlife overhaul anyway. The refueling portion is only about 10 percent [of the refueling and comprehensive overhaul].”

Gerald R. Ford, delivered to the Navy on May 31, is designed for a service life of 50 years, and can expect to receive a three-year-long midlife refueling and comprehensive overhaul (RCOH) at the midpoint of that life, in the early 2040s.

The 10-ship Nimitz class is halfway through its RCOH cycle. Five carriers have completed RCOH and the sixth, USS George Washington, commissioned in 1993, is scheduled to begin its RCOH in August. The last Nimitz-class RCOH is expected to be completed in the early 2030s.

“It will be an eight-year gap,” Moore said of the period between the end of the RCOH for the last Nimitz-class ship and the beginning of the RCOH for Gerald R. Ford.

Moore noted that inactivations of Nimitz-class carriers beginning in the mid-2020s should counter-balance the gap in RCOH work as far as the workforce of Newport News Shipbuilding is concerned.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
golden parachutes ready?
Boeing cuts 50 top defense positions, confirms executives will exit company
To streamline its defense business, Boeing is purging 50 executive positions, a move that will force a large proportion of employees in those roles to permanently depart the company, the head of its defense segment said Wednesday.

The organizational changes were deliberately made to flatten the company and make it more agile and responsive to customer needs, Leanne Caret, CEO of Boeing’s defense business, said during a Defense One event. The intended result is “a more streamlined approach to how we're running the business.”

"This wasn't a decision we made lightly,” she said. Speaking of the 50 impacted executives, she added, “They are exiting the company. There may be a few opportunities for a few of them in a different position at a different level.”

On July 1, Boeing’s current military aircraft and network and space systems segments will consolidate into four entities, all of which will report directly to Caret, the company stated in a news release.

  • Strike, surveillance and mobility will be led by Shelley Lavender, currently president of Boeing Military Aircraft. Lavender will oversee combat aircraft, including the F-15, F/A-18 and P-8 fighters; Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System and modifications for fixed wing aircraft.
  • Vertical Lift, which includes the AH-6i Little Bird, AH-64 Apache, and CH-47 Chinook helicopters and the V-22 Osprey tilt rotor, will be led by David Koopersmith, now vice president and general manager of Vertical Lift.
  • Space and Missile systems will be headed by Jim Chilton, president of network and space systems. This large portfolio will include Boeing’s share of United Launch Alliance, satellites and other space programs as well as its Ground Based Strategic Deterrent bid and missile portfolios.
  • Autonomous Systems will cover the Insitu and Liquid Robotics subsidiaries, unmanned aerial and maritime vehicles and “certain electronic and information systems.” Chris Raymond, who currently leads Boeing’s strategic defense and intelligence systems organization, has been named the leader of this area.
Phantom Works, global operations and development will be largely untouched by the changes, as those segments already report directly to Caret.

The changes, announced by the company Tuesday, are part of a larger campaign by Caret to improve Boeing’s structure as the Defense Department increasingly prioritizes affordability and speed to market, she said. The company has already embarked on a wave of site consolidations and is moving its defense headquarters from St. Louis to Washington in an effort to be more available to military and congressional leaders in the Beltway.

Caret was reluctant to pin the changes on one particular event — for instance, the high profile losses of the joint strike fighter program to Lockheed or the bomber program to Northrop Grumman.

“It was not winning a collection of things that caused me to say, ‘Now is the time,’” she said.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Today at 8:51 AM
anyway Navy Student Pilots Enter 3rd Month Without T-45 Training Flightssource is Military.com
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
but Aviation Leaders Still Unsure Why Marines Not Facing Same Hypoxia Issues as Navy, Air Force
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Further adding to the disparity between the Marine Corps’ experiences and the Navy’s is that the Marines’ legacy F/A-18A-D Hornets have had relatively few problems with their Environmental Control Systems that control cockpit pressure, whereas the Navy has seen higher rates of decompression sickness as a result of ECS failures. Decompression sickness from ECS problems and hypoxia from OBOGS problems are collectively referred to as “physiological episodes” and are both being investigated by Naval Air Systems Command.

“Inside some of the like airplanes, F-18s, legacy F-18s, we have a little bit less incident of the physiological events than our Navy brothers that are flying the same airplane,” Davis said.
“So you go, why? We don’t know why. We have some, but not as much” physiological episodes on the Hornet, he added.

Davis cautioned against taking drastic measures in light of these physiological episodes in the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force, and across all types of tactical aircraft in the naval aviation inventory.

“Here’s what I do know, I was thinking about this on the way over here: I went from liquid oxygen as a young officer to OBOGS, and I’m like, this is great. Think about it: you have a bottle you have to manage, and if the bottle runs out and you’re in a trans-Atlantic, trans-Pac, you have to drop down below 2,000 feet because you’re out of oxygen. Now it’s generated on the airplane,” Davis said.
“What I do know is it’s been working well for over 20 years in the T-45 and the F-18. It’s working well in the Harrier now. It’s working well in the F-35B now. So let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water. … Let’s figure out what’s happening here, take our time, get it right.”

Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) is conducting a PE Review on behalf of the Navy and Marine Corps, but NAVAIR Commander Vice Adm. Paul Grosklags said in the hearing that “we’re not doing well on the diagnosis” of the problem. He noted that NAVAIR is simultaneously looking for the root cause and pursuing 10 to 12 “alerting and protective measures” that would make it safe for students to return to the T-45 even without understanding why the OBOGS is failing.

“It is our plan that once we are comfortable that we’ve got those individual items all in place for every single aircraft and air crew down at CNATRA (Chief of Naval Air Training), that is the point where we will consider resuming the training syllabus,” Grosklags told the subcommittee, adding that he hoped that would happen in a matter of weeks rather than months but that a bit more testing of some of the items was still needed.

Finding the root cause of the problem has been a much less successful endeavor so far, though.

“To date we have been unable to find any smoking guns. For T-45s specifically … to date we have not been able to discover a toxin or a contaminant in the breathing gas despite our testing,” the vice admiral said.
“We have taken several of the aircraft from CNATRA, from the training squadron, brought them up to [Naval Air Station Patuxent River] and we have torn some of them apart, to the extent that we took every component in that gas path, that breathing gas path if you will, on the aircraft, starting with the engine and going to the entire system, inspecting all the piping in between, all the way up to the mask and the vest that the aircrew wear. We’ve subjected each one of those individual components to extremes of testing, extremes of environmental conditions in excess of what we would ever expect to see in the aircraft, and we still have not been able to find what we would consider a proximate cause of contamination or something being released into that gas path. We are also doing testing at the system level, we are flying entire aircraft – again, these are aircraft that had issues down at CNATRA – we’re flying entire aircraft with additional instrumentation on the aircraft trying to detect some in-flight real-time. To date we have not been able to find that root cause.”

Instructor pilots have been allowed to fly the T-45s without the OBOGS, relying instead on ambient air, to maintain their qualifications on the aircraft, but they’ve been restricted to less than 5,000 feet elevation and less than 2 Gs of force. Grosklags said about 25 pilots a month are being delayed leaving flight school and going to the Fleet Replacement Squadron, or about 75 total by the end of this month.

Davis said about a third of those pilots are Marine Corps pilots, and if the problem isn’t addressed by September the Marines will face a serious personnel issue.

“It’s a little bit of a perfect storm for the Marine Corps” because the service already had only half the F-18 captains it needed due to previous under-production of pilots. The Hornet pilots that do exist are in large numbers trying to transfer to the F-35B or C through the Transition Conversion Board process, Davis said, and while the Marines do need more F-35 pilots, “I’ve got to keep Harrier pilots and Hornet pilots flying Harriers and Hornets because I don’t have enough of them” either.
 
this is very interesting (unfortunately):
McCain: Where’s the Strategy? Mattis: ‘We’re Working It’
Spearheaded by Chairman Sen. John McCain, members of the Senate Armed Services Committee pressed the Pentagon’s top leadership why it had yet to produce a new national security strategy to inform the budget six months into the Trump administration.

The Arizona Republican said the single year budget the Department of Defense offered to Congress didn’t contain the context and long-range thinking that the House and the Senate needed to make sound decisions.

“We’re moving forward with the authorization with appropriation and without a strategy it makes our job ten times harder,” McCain told Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford and Secretary of Defense James Mattis.
“And it’s now six months and members of this committee, typically Senator Reed and I, but everybody we want a strategy. And, I don’t think that’s a hell of a lot to ask.”

In response, Mattis told the panel the complexity of global threats is taking longer to sort though.

“We have entered a strategy free time and we are scrambling to put it together, but anyone who thinks a strategy — an integrated, interagency, whole of government strategy can be done rapidly is probably someone who hasn’t dealt with it,” he said.
“It is — according to Dr. [Henry] Kissinger — the most complex series of threats that he has ever seen in his lifetime and he’s a master of dealing with kinds of issues. We’re working it.”

On Afghanistan, Mattis said, “We’re not winning right now” and promised to brief the committee by mid-July on the details of the administration’s plans for continued support of the Afghan government.

The danger of pulling out of Afghanistan even after 17 years of fighting there, Mattis said, was “we’ve seen what came out of these ungoverned space” there following the civil war. The result was a Taliban triumph and safe havens for al Qaeda to launch the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States. He described Afghanistan then as “a center for international terrorism” and could be again.

As to what defines winning in Afghanistan, Mattis defined it as the Kabul government through its security forces being able to control the violence. The United States and allies will be helping it train the forces and provide high-end support, especially aviation, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance. He said the largest ethnic group the Pashtun’s through their
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
supports the United States involvement in assisting the Kabul government in the struggle. The same support is found in opinion polling results among Afghans that were not conducted by the United States, Mattis added.

The fighting in Afghanistan has entered “an era of frequent skirmishing.” Earlier, Mattis said, “Right now, I believe the enemy is surging” hoping to build on its successes in the past year.

When asked about news reports about Russian attempting to hack into 39 states election data, Mattis said, “It’s worse” than that.

Dunford said the Pentagon “now talks about all domains” and expects it to be integrated into strategy and operations. He said the department is not only looking at defensive measures but “being able to take the fight to the enemy” if a cyber attack is launched against the United States. That “doesn’t mean the response has to be limited to cyberspace.”

Both said there should be consequences for Russia or any other nation or non-state actor for using cyber to attack United States infrastructure, including its electoral process. “This sort of misbehavior has to have consequences,” Mattis said.

Mattis acknowledged there are vulnerabilities in the United States to cyber attack that are being reviewed and addressed.

Dunford said overall, “I believe we have a competitive advantage over any adversary” now and probably for the next five years. What is needed is a commitment from Congress to passing a budget annually, rather than relying on Continuing Resolutions with all their restrictions to keep the government operating. He added budgets and five-year projections provide predictability to modernize the force and introduce needed new systems. He and Mattis called for defense spending to rise to five percent above the rate of inflation. The request for Fiscal Year 2018 calls for spending about three percent above the projected rate of inflation.

At the same time, the impact of the Budget Control Act puts hard limits on Pentagon and other federal discretionary spending. Sen. Jack Reed, (D-R.I.) and ranking member, said, “The budget that is submitted will not work” because it is more than $50 billion above the caps.

McCain and others noted during the hearing that Congress has to lift the caps, but so far Capitol Hill has not reached a comprehensive budget agreement on how to do that even for the FY 2017 request.

When asked about the impact of a blockade of Qatar by Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf states, Dunford said air operations against the Islamic State in Syria and continuing and United States naval forces continue to transit the waters without harassment. The United States maintains a large air base in Qatar and elements of Central Command’s forward headquarters.

“We have friends in the region who have problems,” Mattis said, referring to Qatar’s support of the Muslim Brotherhood, its diplomatic exchanges with the Taliban and possible ties to al Qaeda. “Our policy is to try to reduce the problems” because “there are a lot of passions at play here.”
source is USNI News
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Jan 23, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

no word about the cost hahaha

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
now
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
One of the most controversial new weapons in the US arsenal, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
meant to replace the Air Launched Cruise Missile, came under direct fire by a top Senate defense and intelligence lawmaker, Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
holds seats both on the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee and the Senate Intelligence Committee and is respected on both sides of the aisle for her command of the facts. Why did she question Defense Secretary Jim Mattis so closely during a Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee hearing about a proposed nuclear weapon that, at first glance, seems to be a replacement of an existing system?

“I believe it is in fact a new nuclear weapon,” Feinstein told Mattis, saying much of what informed her opinion was classified. “It’s got features which concern me greatly. I don’t see it as an effective deterrent weapon. I see Russia taking action to counter it.” And, just to make sure Mattis understood she really did have a problem with its development, she added
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
s “cost is going to be inordinate.”

Of course, one lawmaker’s inordinate cost may be another’s irreplaceable deterrence tool. Mattis is not yet in either camp. Back in January, Mattis signaled he harbored doubts about the need for LRSO. “I need to look at that one.” he said then. “My going in position is that it makes sense, but I have to look at it in terms of its deterrence capability.”

LRSO is in the early stages of development, but it is already slated to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Mattis’ position didn’t seem to have changed much five months later, but this administration has not completed its national security review so he appears to be still gathering information. One of our contributors, Rebeccah Heinrich, penned an op-ed on how Trump should handle the Russians on nuclear arms. Heinrich, an expert on missile defense and nuclear weapons affiliated with the Hudson Institute, said that when Mattis “receives his briefings on LRSO he’ll discover it will be critical for stealthily clearing the way for a bomber with great precision and low nuclear yields, and it can be launched from a safe distance.”

Mattis did seem to echo some of those arguments in his answer: “We’ve got to make sure the bombers can get through,” he told Feinstein. A central issue is “how can we keep the bomber survivable.”

Ironically, the Obama Administration, supposedly advocates of getting the US military down to zero nuclear weapons, voiced strong and consistent support for the LRSO.

There was one final and possibly revealing comment by Feinstein to Mattis about her concerns about the weapon, and I’m betting it comes very close to the classification red lines. “You will look at its range, as well as our ability to abort it?” she asked. The safe assumption is Mattis will.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Saturday at 1:30 PM
it's making Breaking News at gazeta.ru right now (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
):
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!





Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
! A
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Su-27 Flanker got into our shot
1f4f8.png
during a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
sortie over the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
today. The intercept was deemed safe.
DB5uOoTWsAAA6MU.jpg


DB5xVGvWsAEuGTn.jpg

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and here's Cockpit Video From Inside A U.S. Air Force B-1B Lancer As The bomber Is intercepted Over The Baltic By A Russian Su-27 Flanker
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Yesterday at 8:24 PM
golden parachutes ready?
Boeing cuts 50 top defense positions, confirms executives will exit company

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and here's DoDBuzz.com:
Cuts at Boeing Defense Spurred by ‘Not Winning,’ Executive Says
A driving factor behind Boeing Co.’s latest announcement to cut more than 50 executive positions within its defense and space unit is based on “not winning a collection of things,” its CEO said Wednesday.

“The longer you stay in any position … it becomes harder, not easier,” to make changes, Leanne Caret, chief executive officer of the Chicago-based company’s Defense, Space & Security unit, told audiences at a DefenseOne event in Washington, D.C. “Time is money.”

Caret, who has been in the job for about a year, said no single event prompted the move, which could eliminate dozens of positions beginning July 1, DefenseOne reported.

But clearly, a significant loss to the company was not winning the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber program.

Northrop Grumman Corp. in 2015 landed the multi-billion-dollar deal to develop a fleet of next-generation stealth bombers.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, initially worth $21.4 billion, but the Government Accountability Office denied the challenge.

Caret said that “perpetuating doing business the old way” became a disadvantage to its customers, both in the U.S. and foreign buyers.

It’s “about taking out a layer of executive management, which is what we’ve done, flattening the organization so it elevates some of the programs, so that there are direct reports to me … able to have a more streamlined approach to how we’re going to do business,” she said.

Even so, the future of dozens of executives at the company remains unclear.

Caret said, “We will be working with them … [some] may be exiting the company, there may be a few opportunities for a few of them in a different position at a different level.”

The move is part of a three-part strategy, she said. The first steps focused on moving and consolidating facilities — Boeing relocated its defense division headquarters from
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
., region.

At the time of the relocation announcement in December, Pentagon defense spending made headlines after then-President-elect Donald Trump singled out large defense programs for being too costly — notably, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
recapitalization program, which
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

When asked if President Trump has been good or bad for the defense business, Caret on Wednesday replied, “I don’t think there is a good or bad. I think it’s fair to say that in any administration … what I like, and I think that’s what we’ve all seen, is that he’s focused on business results. He’s focused on getting a great deal for our taxpayer.”

Other executives have made similar comments.

Lockheed Martin Corp. CEO Marillyn Hewson in March credited Trump for accelerating the price drop on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program. Even though the price point
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
— also
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
by then-F-35 program executive officer Air Force Lt. Gen. Chris Bogdan — Hewson said Trump’s involvement in discussions on low-rate initial production (LRIP) for Lot 10 “absolutely” made a difference.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Yesterday at 8:38 PM
Today at 8:51 AM

but Aviation Leaders Still Unsure Why Marines Not Facing Same Hypoxia Issues as Navy, Air Force
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and now I read related story (also mentions the ground F-35s) “No diagnosis” on pilot oxygen issue
US Navy pilots flying T-45 Goshawk trainers and F/A-18E/F Super Hornets continue to struggle with oxygen problems, yet the service has found no root cause to date.

The navy grounded its T-45s indefinitely after pilots reported oxygen deprivation. T-45 instructors, but not students, were allowed returned to flying in April but under restrictions. The navy forced instructor pilots to fly under 5,000ft altitude and maintain 2g manoeuvres, an envelope that would not require the use of the use of the on board oxygen generator system (OBOGS).

During a 13 June Senate hearing, Vice Adm Paul Grosklags, commander of Naval Air Systems Command, told members of Congress that the T-45 pilots often experience breathing gas issues while the F/A-18 pilots report pressurization problems.

“We’re not doing well on the diagnosis,” Grosklags told senators this week. “To date, we have been unable to find any smoking guns.”

Despite testing, the navy has not been able to discover a contaminant in the breathing gas, he says. Several aircraft are undergoing testing at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland, where the service has examined every single component in breathing gas path out of the aircraft from the engine to the mask, he adds. Even after extreme testing, the navy has not found what it considers the cause of contamination or an element being released into the gas.

In the meantime, the US Navy could hemorrhage students if the service does not solve the issue by this fall. The service has not flown any training events with students since March, delaying a crop of about 25 undergraduate pilots per month. By the end of the June, the service will delay 75 students moving to the next squadron, Grosklags says. The US Marine Corps represents about a third of the navy’s production, says the USMC’s deputy commandant for aviation, Lt. Gen. Jon Davis.

“I need to have students loading those up in September,” Davis says. “We have a problem with numbers.”

Meanwhile, 48 F-35A aircraft are still grounded at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona after pilots reported hypoxia symptoms. Davis is not aware of hypoxia issues on the US Navy and USMC’s F-35C and F-35B variants but is watching the incident closely, he says.

Both service and industry officials have not indicated they will abandon the OBOGS, the same system fielded on the F-22, F-35 and T-45, which have all experienced oxygen issues. Boeing is conducting a root cause analysis with the US Navy and has made some progress on the oxygen issue, Boeing executive vice president Leanne Caret said 14 June. When asked whether industry is considering stepping away from OBOGS, Caret said the root cause should be found first.

“Nothing’s off the table,” Caret says. “But we don’t want to predetermine, that’s the worst thing you can do. This is a serious issue for our pilots.”
source is FlightGlobal
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top