US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
BAE Systems completes Amphibious Combat Vehicle shipboard testing
By:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
April 5, 2017 (Photo Credit: Courtesy of BAE Systems)
WASHINGTON -- BAE Systems completed crucial shipboard testing of its new Amphibious Combat Vehicle prototype with partner Italian company Iveco Defense Vehicles in the Ionian Sea off the coast of Italy last week.

John Swift, BAE System’s ACV program manager, told Defense News at the Navy League’s Sea-Air-Space conference at National Harbor in Maryland on Wednesday that the company and its partner Iveco demonstrated the vehicle's ability to perform consecutive ship launch and recoveries and operate the vehicle in six- to eight-foot surf and white caps in wind roughly 10 to 15 knots.

BAE Systems and SAIC are building ACV prototypes for the Marine Corps in a competition. The Marine Corps awarded each company roughly $100 million in December 2015 to build 16 prototypes each for the service to test.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In the independent at-sea tests last week, Iveco’s vehicle was able to demonstrate an objective capability the Marine Corps wants for its next ACV variant beyond the original version: the ability for the vehicle to drive itself back onto the boat up a ramp, Swift said.

Because the vehicle’s unique 8x8 wheeled configuration, it has traction that replicates a tracked vehicle and enough torque to pull itself back onto the ship. The capability also helps the vehicle transition in soft soil coming up onto a beach, he noted.

And the vehicle also came ashore transitioning from surf to land, according to Swift.

The testing in the Ionian Sea marks a capstone event at which the Italian Navy and Marine Corps were present to generate “a bit of energy” toward funding for Italy to start its own engineering and manufacturing development phase of an ACV program it started over five years ago.

The Italians have yet to reach the engineering and manufacturing design phase with an Amphibious Assault Vehicle replacement for its amphibious battalions resident in the Navy, Army and Marine Corps due to funding shortfalls and worldwide commitments in support of NATO, where funding was diverted.

BAE presented its first ACV prototype to the Marine Corps in December and has delivered six vehicles to date, Swift said. Two more will go to the Marines next week. There are currently four in tests with the service: two at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, one at Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona, and one at Camp Pendleton, California.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

BAE and SAIC are required to deliver 16 vehicles each to the Marines by June 15.

A final request for proposals is expected in December with a response due in January 2018, Swift said, adding he expected a low-rate production decision in June 2018.

The Marines plan to field 204 of the vehicles by 2020. The total value of the contract with all options exercised is expected to amount to about $1.2 billion.

Some of the features BAE believes are particularly attractive for a new ACV is that it has space for 13 embarked Marines and a crew of three, which keeps the rifle squad together. The engine's strength is 690 horsepower over the old engine’s 560 horsepower, and it runs extremely quietly. The vehicle has a V-shaped hull to protect against underbody blasts, and the seat structure is completely suspended.

SAIC’s vehicle, which is being built in Charleston, South Carolina, offers improved traction through a central tire-inflation system to automatically increase or decrease tire pressure. It also has a V-hull certified during tests at the Nevada Automotive Test Center — where all prototypes will be tested by the Marine Corps — and has blast-mitigating seats to protect occupants.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Army speeds up future Modular Active Protection System for combat vehicles
By:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
April 6, 2017

Detroit Arsenal, Mich. -- The Army is speeding up development work on its future Modular Active Protection System for combat vehicles.

As the service works on expediting interim solutions for combat vehicle Active Protection Systems, officials are simultaneously ramping up some of the first MAPS tests using soft-kill countermeasures. There is also a plan to begin using the first prototypes of a common controller toward the end of the year. Once the common controller is available, the Army will begin “layered testing,” mixing both soft-kill and hard-kill countermeasures, Col. Glenn Dean told Defense News in a March 27 interview at the Detroit Arsenal in Michigan.

Dean, who is the project manager for the Army’s Stryker Brigade Combat Team, has also been tasked with helping to execute force protection efforts.

The first phase of MAPS development will be completed in 2019, Erik Kallio, assistant associate director for Ground Systems Survivability, said in the same interview.

The Army is in the process of bridging near-term, off-the-shelf APS characterization work into the MAPS effort and then into a long-term program of record -- the Vehicle Protection System (VPS) -- in 2018. A future product manager has already been identified, Dean said.

A year and a half ago, Lt. Gen. Michael Williamson, the Army’s military deputy to the acquisition chief at the time, challenged the Army Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center (TARDEC) in Detroit, to move faster on the MAPS program.

Originally MAPS would be developed over an eight-year period before any capability would be fielded, Dean said.

The Army had previously looked at a number of off-the-shelf systems, but each time the service examined a possible capability, it was determined the system was not ready for combat, and “we kind of defaulted back to the technology development path that we were on,” Dean said.

But to meet Williamson’s challenge, TARDEC decided to do more work on MAPS in parallel with the interim APS solution efforts.

The idea is not to scrap the interim solutions when MAPS comes online. Since MAPS is being developed as an open architecture system with a common controller, the best technology from off-the-shelf APS systems the Army is examining now could feed directly into its own program, according to Dean.

“We said if the off-the-shelf systems perform adequately and the impacts to the platform are acceptable, you potentially have a path to field something very, very soon and eventually you can fold in the technology that you are developing, so it gives us a path,” Dean said. “And if you are not happy with the off-the-shelf performance, you haven’t lost anything and the MAPS program and VPS have gained a tremendous amount of insight into what are the challenges going to be ahead applying that technology.”




The bulk of the expedited APS activity takes place this year with decisions on the way forward expected in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018.

The Army is currently characterizing three APS systems on Abrams tanks, Strykers and Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicles. The three systems are Israel-based Rafael Advanced Defense Systems’ Trophy, Israeli Military Industry’s Iron Fist and U.S.-based Artis Corporation’s Iron Curtain.

The service would like to look at other APS systems such as Rheinmetall’s Active Defense System should funding become available, Dean said.

In order to move quickly the Army isn’t integrating the APS systems onto the vehicles, which would include software integration work that is too complex and time-consuming, treating the technology more as an applique, which still provides effective capability, Dean said.

Characterization on the vehicles is just as important as learning APS capabilities because it informs what impacts to the platform’s performance might exist, he added.

For instance, Bradley is “the most challenged vehicle in our combat fleet in terms of size, weight and power; it’s a small platform, has a lot of payload and is very tightly packed,” Dean said.

In its current configuration, the Bradley could not host an off-the-shelf APS capability, so the Army is working with what it’s calling a “Franken-Bradley,” with improved power generation in order for it to handle the APS, according to Dean. The improved power comes in the next engineering change proposal -- the A4 program.

Because of the Bradley’s current configuration, Dean noted, an APS system for that vehicle might not be able to be fielded until it can be worked into Bradley A4s.

“Understanding what your margins are in terms of power, in terms of weight, what is the system going to do to your ability to engage and track targets,” whether the APS radar interferes with jammers or radio systems -- those are all factors for consideration in the decision process later this year, Dean said.

“When we reach that decision point,” he said, “a decision could be, ‘Hey, this system doesn’t work on this vehicle, but system B, maybe we want to move it over and evaluate that or bring on system D or E that we haven’t started work on yet.”

Even if the Army decides to buy an APS system now, he added, “the core of what we are doing in MAPS is really to give the Army flexibility in how it procures APS in the future.”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
And Boeing is bowing out.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Lockheed Passes On USAF’s Light Attack Demo
Apr 8, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
| Aerospace Daily & Defense Report
  • t50alockheedmartin.png

    Lockheed Martin has decided not to offer an aircraft for the U.S. Air Force’s light attack demonstration this summer, making it the second major defense contractor in two weeks to opt out of the OA-X experiment. Lockheed joins Boeing in passing on the OA-X demonstration this summer at Holloman AFB, New Mexico,
Story is locked behind a paywall but the Gist is all we need This means neither Lockheed Martin and Boeing have decided not to take part.
that leaves only Northrop Grumman as a option for the major American Aviation makers. They have an option atleast in theory. Scaled Composites built a demonstrator for the Army called the Ares back in 1990 The Agile Responsive Effective Support Scaled Composite 151 powered by a single jet, armed with a 25mm Gau 12/U cannon and 4 hard points. Scaled_Composites_ARES_151.jpg
From time to time it has returned and run demos or been used for other functions. A upgraded version could give scorpion a run for it's money.
And of course brings up Textron Airland.
TAL Scorpion.jpg
It's larger with more payload, hard points and sensors but no gun system.
Short of restarting production of the A10 these two are the best options available.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The US Navy should have made the Freedom and INdependence "frigtaes" from the get go.

The OHP Frigaes has, for their time, decent ASuW, deent AAW area coverage, and very good ASW capabilities. All thee with no "modules".

A US Navy FFG should be able to do all three today too...and each of those classes could be retrofitted to do so (The freedom and Independence) and they should be, post ahste.

For the last 8-10 years we have himm-hawwed around with this design...but given who was President for most of that time, and the convoluted thinking that admin had on most military matters...it is nmot surprising.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
US P-8A to track & attack subs like a HAAWC,

Boeing has the contract to build a glider kit for the Mk 54 torpedo, the High Altitude Anti-submarine warfare Weapon Capability (HAAWC). HAAWC integrates an air-launched accessory (ALA) kit with a GPS guidance system and folding wings. This will allow the launch of the weapon from 30,000ft under operator control so the torpedo can be put into the water with precision and at the considerable distance from the aircraft that launched it.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

US P-8A to track & attack subs like a HAAWC .jpg
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Lockheed Passes On USAF’s Light Attack Demo
Apr 8, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
| Aerospace Daily & Defense Report
  • t50alockheedmartin.png


    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    has decided not to offer an aircraft for the U.S. Air Force’s light attack demonstration this summer, making it the second major defense contractor in two weeks to opt out of the OA-X experiment.

    Lockheed joins
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    in passing on the OA-X demonstration this summer at Holloman AFB, New Mexico, company spokesman John Losinger confirmed to Aviation Week. Proposals for the experiment – which could lead to a buy of 300 off-the-shelf, light-attack aircraft for counterterrorism missions – were due to the Air Force April 7.

    Of the big three U.S. aerospace giants, this leaves just
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    a possible contender. A spokesman declined to comment on whether the company would participate.

    Rob Weiss, Lockheed Martin Skunk Works executive vice president and general manager, hinted at Lockheed’s decision not to participate in OA-X last month during the company’s media day. He suggested that the T-50A Lockheed is developing jointly with Korea Aerospace Industries – the most logical choice for OA-X – might not fit the bill.

    “The way it currently is described, it looks like there are lower cost and much lower capability airplanes than the trainers,” he said March 21.

    Losinger did not disclose the reasoning behind the decision not to participate in OA-X, but Weiss hinted that the T-50A may not meet the OA-X runway and fuel burn requirements. The Air Force has said OA-X must be able to operate from a 6,000-ft. runway and have an average fuel flow of 1,500 lb./hr. or less.

    The decision to opt out of this phase of the light attack effort does not preclude Lockheed or Boeing from eventually participating in an OA-X competition. The Air Force has stressed that right now the effort is in the experimentation phase, and no program of record has been initiated. The assessment at Holloman could lead to another experiment or a combat demonstration, or even an immediate acquisition program, said Lt. Gen. Arnold Bunch, the Air Force’s military acquisition deputy.

    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    is the only major defense contractor to publicly say it will participate in the OA-X demonstration. It will likely offer the Beechcraft AT-6 Wolverine or Scorpion jet.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Autonomous Strike – a New Milestone in Manned-Unmanned Teaming
By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
-
Apr 10, 2017
883

F-35_F-16_Luke_1021.png


The US Air Force and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
’s advanced projects unit – the ‘Skunk Works’, have completed a series of flight tests demonstrating the teaming of a manned and unmanned fighter jets, participating in mock combat operations. During the flight demonstration, an experimental F-16 aircraft acted as a surrogate Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) autonomously reacting to a dynamic threat environment during an air-to-ground strike mission. The demonstration success included three key objectives:

  • The ability to autonomously plan and execute air-to-ground strike missions based on mission priorities and available assets
  • The ability to dynamically react to a changing threat environment during an air-to-ground strike mission while automatically managing contingencies for capability failures, route deviations, and loss of communication
  • A fully compliant USAF Open Mission Systems (OMS) software integration environment allowing rapid integration of software components developed by multiple providers
For the recent phase designated “
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
II” Skunk Works teamed with the US Air Force’s Research Laboratory (AFRL), the Pilot School and Calspan Corporation.


“This demonstration is an important milestone in AFRL’s maturation of technologies needed to integrate manned and unmanned aircraft in a strike package,” said Capt. Andrew Petry, AFRL autonomous flight operations engineer. “We’ve not only shown how an Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle can perform its mission when things go as planned, but also how it will react and adapt to unforeseen obstacles along the way.”

ACTING AS A SURROGATE
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, AN EXPERIMENTAL F-16 AUTONOMOUSLY REACTED TO A DYNAMIC THREAT ENVIRONMENT, DURING A SIMULATED STRIKE MISSION

The two-week demonstration at the Test Pilot School at Edwards Air Force Base, California, is the second in a series of manned/unmanned teaming exercises to prove enabling technologies.

“The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
II demonstration team pushed the boundaries of autonomous technology and put a fully combat-capable F-16 in increasingly complex situations to test the system’s ability to adapt to a rapidly changing operational environment,” said Shawn Whitcomb, Lockheed Martin Skunk Works
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
program manager. “This is a critical step to enabling future
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
technology development and operational transition programs.”

qf16_1021.jpg

The USAF is using unmanned QF-16s for target practice and training with live weapons. The QF-16 replaces the obsolete QF-4 Phantom
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. In the future, such platforms could also assume combat roles as ‘avatars’ or companions to manned aircraft. Photo:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Air Forces’ Loyal Wingman program foresee the techniques, tactics, and procedures of controlling semi-autonomous missions of UCAVs by pilots of manned fifth Generation fighters (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
/
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
). Such platforms should be able to ‘play’ in both air/air and air/ground scenarios, carrying weapons and flying the more risky parts of the mission, thus increasing the survivability and effectiveness of the manned platforms. QF-16s (unmanned targets) are considered the most cost-effective platforms for this mission, although being a Fourth Generation fighter with no stealth capability would compromise a mixed manned-unmanned strike package. Apart from the tried and tested F-16 the Air Force is also testing other target aircraft, some designed specifically for attack missions – such as the UTAP-22 built by Kratos.

The first demonstration, ‘Have Raider I’, focused on advanced vehicle control. The experimental F-16 autonomously flew in formation with a lead aircraft and conducted a ground-attack mission, then automatically rejoined the lead aircraft after the mission was completed. These capabilities were linked with Lockheed Martin automatic collision avoidance systems to ensure safe, coordinated teaming between the F-16 and surrogate UCAV.

“The OMS architecture used in Have Raider II made it possible to rapidly insert new software components into the system,” said Michael Coy, AFRL computer engineer. “OMS will allow the Air Force maximum flexibility in the development and fielding of cutting edge autonomous capabilities.”

UTAP-22AttackRun.png

An artist rendering showing a group of Kratos UTAP-22
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
launch an airstrike under the leadership of an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Illustration: Kratos
Effective manned/unmanned teaming reduces the high cognitive workload, allowing the warfighter to focus on creative and complex planning and management. Autonomous systems also have the ability to access hazardous mission environments, react more quickly, and provide persistent capabilities without fatigue. Each drone will have onboard autonomy sufficient to complete all basic flight operations untethered from a ground station and without full-time direction from the manned lead.

For future applications of the Loyal Wingman concept, the Air Force is considering employing several
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
with each manned fighter jet. The flight will use dedicated processors that will be able to assess the operational scenario based on each platforms’ sensors and decide the course of action for the group of drones. A prototype of such system is under development at the University of Cincinnati. It employs artificial intelligence and fuzzy logic techniques known as ‘
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
’ has demonstrated in simulations capabilities superior to well-trained fighter pilots.

The Air Force plans to begin flying aircraft equipped to control a full ‘Loyal Wingman’ drone formation in 2018. Testing is scheduled to continue for four years, through 2022. Eventually, the US Air Force plans to assign drone formations to all front line aircraft – the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Lightning II,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Raptor and possibly its newest bomber –
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Raider.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The Reaper Kits-up for Operation in Contested Airspace
By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
-
Apr 11, 2017


For more than two decade unmanned aerial systems (UAS) operated by the U.S. armed forces are used mainly in asymmetric warfare, against irregular forces that do not pose serious threats to U.S. airpower. But in recent years the situation has changed. Irregular forces in many theaters are equipped with air defense assets. In many theaters missions are already flown in airspaces dominated by potentially hostile radars and air defenses. In the South China Sea, the Korean Peninsula, Yemen, Iraq and Syria, such environments would limit the usability of conventional drones, unless suitable mission systems and countermeasures are deployed.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Aeronautical Systems, Inc. (GA‑ASI) has recently demonstrated such a system by equipping their B/
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Block 5 equipped with a Radar Warning Receiver (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
). The test was part of an airborne demonstration of the drone’s capability to operate on the edge of ‘contested airspace’ – areas defended by surface to air missile systems (SAM). For the recent test, the company owned
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
drone carried a standard pod equipped with
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
A
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. This sensor provides enhanced situational awareness to aircrew and air element command and control units by identifying potential radar threats in or near contested airspace environments.


The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
A is often used as a sensor for self-protection systems, that consist of chaff and flare dispensers, jammers and decoys, but the recent tests on the Reaper employed the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
as a sensor that detects and alerts operators on hostile radar activity in its operating airspace. Once the RWR spots a hostile radar it cues other onboard sensors (such as an SAR radar or EO/IR payload) to identify and designate it for the attack. The system can also operate in self-protection but this mode has not been tested.

During the recent tests, the system was operated in various flight profiles. According to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the pod was able to validate RWR performance which met or exceeded current thresholds for both air and ground radar threats. Additionally, the RWR information to the flight crew was deemed useful for triggering flight crew action, such as manually cross-cueing to other onboard sensors to validate threat information.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
plans further RWR demonstrations later in the year to include integrating with Link 16 communications datalink.

ALR69A_MQ9_725.png

For the RWR demonstration, this B/
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Reaper Block 5 carried the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
ALR-69A Radar Warning Receiver in a standard payload pod. Once the RWR spots a hostile radar it cues other onboard sensors (such as an SAR radar or EO/IR payload) to identify and designate it for the attack. The system can also operate in self-protection but this mode has not been tested. The RWR Photo: GA-ASI
The current development of this new capability is conducted by the company as a private investment, with the goal of partnering with potential customers in the near future. “The successful demonstration of a mature radar warning receiver on our company-owned Predator B clearly shows the utility of the aircraft in conducting missions in the proximity of threat radars and enemy air defenses,” said Claudio Pereida, executive vice president, Mission Systems, GA-ASI. “We are pleased to be the first company to demonstrate this capability on a remotely piloted aircraft and hope to make it available to interested customers on a quick-reaction basis.”

“The ALR-69A provides improved detection range and accurate, unambiguous identification in dense signal environments,” Paul Overstreet, ALR-69A program manager,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
added. “Its open architecture is what allows it to operate on manned or unmanned aircraft.”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top