US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Brumby

Major
but
Pentagon Still Unsure If It Needs More Growlers; Boeing Says Production Restart Would Be Possible

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I believe the USN wanted to increase the number of Growlers from 5 to 7 per squadron because 3 is needed for each mission and 5 would not provide 24 hours coverage. They might have reached their goal based on recent budget allocations. The $1 billion Raytheon contract is for NGJ pods not airframe.
 

Brumby

Major
Marines' deadly fighter jet to make its first ship-based deployment next year
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Marine Corps' version of the joint strike fighter's maiden deployment is set for late 2017 and its bound for the Western Pacific, the Navy's top officer in the Pacific said Tuesday.

The F-35B jump-jet stealth fighter will deploy aboard an amphibious flattop, enhancing its combat might, and the service is planning a more powerful escort force to support it, according to Adm. Scott Swift, head of Pacific Fleet.

The F-35B was declared operational in July 2015 and testing continues ahead of next year's debut. PACFLT spokesman Lt. Clint Ramsden confirmed it would be the aircraft's first time to be based aboard a ship for a deployment, which typically lasts from a few months up to an eight-month cruise.

A surface action group, like the three-destroyer group dispatched mid-April to the Western Pacific, will defend the amphibious assault ship.

The concept was rolled out by Adm. Scott Swift during an April 26 all-hands call on the destroyer Momsen, which was docked in Hawaii on a port visit.

“I think this is going to revolutionize where we are with expeditionary strike groups,” Swift said. “The three-ship PAC SAG that [destroyers] Decatur, Momsen and Spruance are part of will pave the way for another SAG, just like this one, attached to the large-deck amphib so that it will become what I’m calling an ‘Up-Gunned ESG.’”

A typical ESG includes an amphibious assault ship, a dock landing ship or amphibious transport dock and a couple of destroyers or a cruiser and a destroyer. An attack sub may also accompany the group.

This new concept, with the addition of the joint strike fighter, looks a lot like a mini-carrier strike group. The surface action group envisioned by Swift would include a big deck and a handful of shooters.

Swift also said he has asked the destroyer squadron leader for the surface action group currently deployed to assign warfare commander responsibilities to the different ships and to act as if it were attached to the expeditionary strike group. The Decatur, which is a ballistic missile defense-capable ship, could take on the role of air warfare commander, a role typically assigned to a cruiser.

“I’m excited about the potential options you will explore as part of this three ship SAG,” Swift told sailors.

The SAG was deployed from Washington state and San Diego and was sent to be a test-case for new tactical concepts.

The idea is to break up groups of surface combatants to threaten enemy ships and land targets from multiple angles and force the adversary to devote surveillance assets like submarines and aircraft to find them. The surface action groups pull the enemy in multiple directions and make it harder to target carrier strike groups.

The up-gunned ESG takes that approach a step further and creates even more problems for an adversary when you add the F-35B, which has a significantly longer range than the AV-8B Harrier, which is a mainstay of the Marines' ground-attack mission. The F-35B will be able to take off vertically. It's the version that the Royal Navy plans to put on its new class of carriers, rather than the F-35C that features a tailhook.

An up-gunned ESG could also help alleviate some of burden on the overstretched flattop fleet, though the amphibious assault ships will only pack six to eight F-35s, said Jerry Hendrix, a retired naval aviator and analyst at the Center for a New American Security. That's compared to roughly 40 jets on an aircraft carrier.

“This is a step forward in the right direction,” Hendrix said. “What Adm. Swift is doing is tuning the force to get the most out of it, and that’s important given the carrier shortage we have right now. It also shows the scalability of the force to meet different demands.”

Seth Cropsey, head of the Hudson Institute’s Center for American Seapower, agreed it was a step in the right direction but that the concept was still large and expensive for low-to-mid-range missions.

“If we want ESGs to fight smaller brush fires to leave the carriers to larger conflagrations, that’s fine but it’s still expensive,” Cropsey said. “The F-35B is not something you buy in your local CVS.”

The Navy is still trying to find the right way to use its high-tech and expensive force that regularly gets called to do low-end missions such as counter-piracy and disaster relief, Cropsey said.

“They are still adjusting the dials and come up with something that handles both large-scale warfare — and in the Western Pacific that means China — and the lower order things like [humanitarian assistance, disaster relief]. I don’t think the up-gunned ESG is the end of the line, and I don’t think PACFLT thinks it’s the end of the line either.”
 
related to the preceding post LOL
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
also related:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The House Armed Services Committee is certainly no friend to today’s Russia as ruled by Vladimir Putin, but even they now support the Pentagon’s plans to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The HASC approved by voice vote an amendment by Rep. Mike Coffman of Colorado to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that would allow the United Launch Alliance to use up to 18 of the highly reliable and cheap engines, as the Air Force and Pentagon have pressed for. The panel’s top Democrat, Rep. Adam Smith, also offered an amendment authorizing $100 million to develop a launch vehicle, upper stage, strap-on motor, or related infrastructure. That was clearly an effort to loosen the restrictions on rocket engine research money favored by HASC Chairman Mac Thornberry and Rep. Mike Rogers, chairman of the HASC strategic forces subcommittee.

Thornberry and Rogers have sent Air Force leaders a letter saying they want investment only spent on rocket engines and not on launch systems, as the Air Force wants. Rogers has taken a position not far off that of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
who keeps pressing for development of an American rocket replacement for the RD-180, ignoring the enormous costs that would be incurred in building new engines that would then have to be integrated with the Atlas V. It also ignores the truth that America has been unable so far to duplicate the superb reliability and power of the RD-180s.

According to my colleague Mike Gruss at Space News: “The (NDAA) bill, as drafted, would leave Aerojet Rocketdyne’s AR1 engine as the only piece of the Air Force’s portfolio of rocket-propulsion partnerships that meets the new criteria. The proposed restrictions would also require any unobligated money from 2015 or 2016 follow the same guidelines.”

The AR1 does use the same propellant of kerosene and liquid oxygen but it won’t see its first launch — presuming everything goes well — until 2020 or later.

The amendments passed last night appear to put the kibosh on those restrictions. Even if the authorizers succeed in placing restrictions on the research, two space experts with whom I spoke today say the appropriators are unlikely to accept the approach supported by Rogers and McCain.

In other space-related news, an amendment by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
directs the Secretary of Defense to provide Congress with a briefing
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. And Rep. Doug Lamborn of Colorado offered one requiring a joint Pentagon-Director of National Intelligence report on commercial space-based capabilities.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
quite interesting:
Turner: Carter Has ‘Lost Total Credibility’ on Budget
A lead hawk in the US House fired back at Defense Secretary Ash Carter on Thursday for his criticism of a House GOP plan to fund defense next year, saying the Pentagon’s top official has “lost total credibility” on budget matters.

House Armed Services Tactical AirLand Subcommittee Chairman Mike Turner, R-Ohio, made his pointed comments on a conference call with reporters Thursday, hours after an all-night session saw the House Armed Services Committee vote to send the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act to the full House.

At issue is a plan, formulated by HASC chairman Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, that takes $18 billion out of the Pentagon’s special overseas contingency operations (OCO) wartime fund and invest it into buying more weapon systems in the base budget. More importantly, it sets an expiation for OCO come April of 2017, a tactic designed to force the next president to request a new war-funding supplemental.

Turner, like Thornberry previously, defended the bill’s blurring of overseas contingency operations and base-budget funding as necessary to adequately fund national security. But that argument is not holding water with Carter, who has used a pair of appearances on the Hill in the last 48 hours to blast Thornberry’s plan as dangerous at a time when the US is involved in multiple combat operations.

During an appearance Wednesday in front of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Carter attempted to throw cold water on the Thornberry plan, saying it amounts to “gambling” with troops' funding at a time of war and calling it “deeply troubling” and “flawed.”

He continued that line on Thursday, saying he has “serious concerns” with the HASC taking money from OCO and putting it towards “programmatic items we didn't request.”

“I have to say, this approach is deeply flawed and troubling. Having detailed my objections yesterday before the appropriations committee, today in the context of this testimony, I just want to highlight the danger of underfunding our war effort, gambling with funding for our troops in places like Iraq and Syria,” Carter said. “As Secretary of Defense, I cannot support such a maneuver.”

Shortly after Carter made his comments, Turner ripped into the secretary for condemning the $583 billion bill agreed to by the HASC, which authorizes $524 billion for the base budget and $58.8 billion for the OCO account.

Some defense hawks in Congress, including Turner, have an interpretation of the 2015 budget deal in which the $59 billion allocated for OCO was a minimum to be raised based on current threats. Turner Thursday accused Carter of delivering a budget to Congress that doesn’t match the deal.

“So he doesn’t have a whole lot of credibility to judge our having stuck with the plan that he previously agreed to and now reneged on,” Turner said.

Democrats and the administration have sought parity on the non-defense side, leading Turner to conclude the president’s budget request kept defense artificially low in order to request more spending on the non-defense side.

“In the end, this administration has to come to grips with the fact that they’re leaving and this bill about the future under a new administration,” Turner said. “They should look at it as, ‘Is this bill good for national security?’ Sign it and walk out of the White House.”

The plan has some key supporters in the House as it heads to a floor vote, including House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., who said the appropriations committee will use the same numbers.

The HASC passed the plan with a bipartisan 60-2 vote and the committee’s ranking Democrat, Adam Smith, of Washington, said although he will back the bill though he has problems with its “fiscal cliff issue” and rejected GOP comparisons to a 2008 war supplemental passed in President Obama’s first days.

“If we continue down the route that this bill goes down, which has the OCO running out about halfway through the year, we are counting on a supplemental,” Smith said in a statement Thursday. “If this is the environment versus the environment before, it is a much, much more risky proposition.”

It is no surprise Carter has brought up his concerns during visits to the two Senate committees, as they represent a natural break on Thornberry’s plan. . Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain, R-Ariz., has indicated he is leaning towards a different, unspecified plan for his bill, and the two sides will have to go to conference – if the language even survives a full House vote.

However, Carter's early criticism of the HASC language could be a sign that he would recommend President Barack Obama veto any defense bill which comes to his desk with the Thornberry OCO plan attached.

Speaking on background, a senior defense official said a potential veto will be discussed "within the context of the entire bill. There is a formal process associated with that."

Senate's Assistant Minority Leader Dick Durbin, D-Ill., on Wednesday appeared to be keeping his powder dry on the House GOP plan.

"We have no budget resolution, so we're making this up as we go along," said Durbin, the ranking member of the Senate Appropriations Defense Subcommittee. "The basic rules have been and continue to be: equal spending on defense and non-defense, no poison pill riders, live up to the budget agreement. Now OCO is obviously being redefined from war funds to investment-in-defense funds. I'm waiting to see the final product, but we have to play by the rules."
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Typhoon, F-22 the King or the Queen ? o_O :) , F-15C and F-15E nice !
View attachment 27256


Typhoon, F-22 the King or the Queen ? o_O :) , F-15C and F-15E nice !
View attachment 27256

Actually your being French is causing you some confusion culturally, it is obviously the Queen, and her court of the "High Realm"? right?

your thinking of aircraft as he is causing you some "gender identity" issues with your aircraft??? LOL? ya see it now don't ya????

almost all aircraft and ships are she
 
quite interesting:
Turner: Carter Has ‘Lost Total Credibility’ on Budget

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related, just one quote:
SASC chairman John McCain — a former prisoner of war in Hanoi turned advocate of reconciliation — followed up with this question to Carter: “You would support lifting restrictions on provision of weapons to the Vietnamese?”

Carter’s response? “We’ve discussed this in the past, and I appreciate your leadership in that regard, Chairman, and yes.”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Actually your being French is causing you some confusion culturally, it is obviously the Queen, and her court of the "High Realm"? right?

your thinking of aircraft as he is causing you some "gender identity" issues with your aircraft??? LOL? ya see it now don't ya????

almost all aircraft and ships are she
So, she and the Queen OK :) but it is true a little curious for me.

F-117 first true stealth aircraft, SR-71 had some stealth design
F-117 get a frontal RCS of 0.01 m2, - 10 dBm, B-2 - 20, F-35 - 30, F-22 - 40 rear the more big in general superior of 10 dBm can vary.
For agility ! very bad but have always do good job during her combat operaations and for a first not too expensive.

Congress appears ready to let the Lockheed F-117A Nighthawk go

The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) is considering a legislative provision that would allow the US Air Force to finally junk the famed Lockheed Martin F-117A Nighthawk.
The aircraft was officially retired from service in April 2008, but Congress demanded that all aircraft mothballed from 30 September 2006 onward be maintained “in a condition that would allow recall of that aircraft to future service”.

The ghost fleet is now accomodated in special climate-controlled hangars at the Tonopah Test Range at Nellis AFB, Nevada – the location dubbed Area 51. There have been dozens of reported sightings and pictures of the aircraft flying since 2008, including sightings of an aircraft being refuelled in flight

The pioneer of the US military’s stealth aircraft revolution, which owes its distinct “Hopeless Diamond” shape to its ability to scatter radar energy, first flew in 1981 but remained shrouded in secrecy until 1988, when the air force acknowledged its existence at a press conference.

Lockheed’s Skunk Works division assembled 59 Nighthawks for the Pentagon between August 1982 and July 1990, but stealth technology and adversary radar detection methods quickly moved past the F-117 and the Air Force quickly turned to newer, more low-observable types like the Lockheed F-22, Northrop Grumman B-2 and now F-35 and B-21.

Now, ten years after the F-117A provision was enacted as part of the 2007 National Defence Authorisation Act, US lawmakers appear willing to let the storied single-seat stealth jet move to the aerospace maintenance and regeneration yard in Arizona, where they’ll probably be torn apart or less likely, scavenged for hard-to-find parts.

If carried forward by the full committee today, the provision by HASC chairman Mac Thornberry would “remove the requirement that certain F-117 aircraft be maintained in a condition that would allow recall of those aircraft to future service” if approved by the full Congress.

The F-117 is most noted for its involvement in Operation Desert Storm in 1991 against Saddam Hussein's forces. That was the first American-led military campaign to make comprehensive use of stealth aircraft.

The F-117 flew 1,299 sorties during that war, achieving an 80% mission success rate with no losses or significant battle damage, according to the air force. The twin General Electric F404-powered high-subsonic aircraft’s primary armaments were internally stored laser-guided Paveway bombs, of which more than 9,300 were dropped on targets in Iraq in 1991.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:
oops Army Aviation Has a Weight Problem
Army aviation has a weight problem and it’s growing, Maj. Gen. William Gayler, the service’s new Army Aviation Center of Excellence commander at Fort Rucker, Ala., said Friday at the Aviation Association of America’s Mission Solutions Summit.

“We’ve been growing and gaining weight for all the rights reasons,” Gayler said. “every new technology, everything designed to protect a crew or its passengers, but we‘ve given maneuverability at the objective away. We’ve given away payload, we’ve given away ammo, we are limiting options to a commander, we are not giving options. We do give options if the weather’s right but if the weather’s not right, we can’t give options,” he lamented.

While Gen. David Perkins, the Army’s Training and Doctrine Command commander, said Army aviation is the epitome of meeting the service’s operating concept, Gayler warned if things don’t go a different direction, the aviation branch may not meet the requirements laid out in the concept.

“When you have to manage your payload, fuel, ammo in order to accomplish the mission and you put eight or nine Black Hawks to move a platoon because of a power limitation when it could be done with four, imagine the waste, the risk,” he said.

“We are capable of giving commanders options, but we also sometimes give a limitation and we gotta fix that,” Gayler added.

The commander noted that the Army is currently only able to fly in 84 percent of the world with the current power generation. In Afghanistan alone, Army aircraft can only fly in about 47 percent of the country.

Also aircraft like UH-60 Black Hawk utility helicopters have grown over “a ton and a quarter” since inception, he said, adding the UH-60s grow in weight, on average, by 78 pounds per year.

Gayler warned that if nothing is done, by the year 2020, “we will be able to move two people” per helicopter “so it will take 15 to 20 Black Hawks to move a platoon.”

The CH-47 Chinook helicopter is expected to stay in service for a total of 100 years — until 2064 — and the lives of AH-64 Apaches and Black Hawks will be similar, Gayler noted.

“I would argue that our current airframes have reached the feasible evolutionary limit to meet the army operating concept,” he said. “We can certainly do things to make them go a little faster, make them stay a little longer, but not to the duration, range or times we need to execute the army operating concept.”

This is why bringing on the Improved Turbine Engine Program (ITEP) engine is so important, Gayler stressed. With ITEP, the Army’s aircraft will be able to reach 96 percent of the globe.

The ITEP engine will replace engines in Black Hawks and Apaches initially. A Honeywell-Pratt & Whitney team and General Electric — the two participants in the Army’s Affordable Advanced Turbine Engine science and technology effort — both responded to a request for proposals last year.

The Army will work toward a Milestone A technology development decision in the spring. Then the service plans to make an award late this summer to up to two vendors to conduct a preliminary design review. The Army will then choose just one engine design to continue into the Milestone B engineering- and manufacturing-development phase in 2019. Low-rate initial production is expected in 2024, just six years before the start of low-rate production of a family of future helicopters to replace the Army’s current fleet.

For Boeing’s vice president of attack helicopter programs, Kim Smith, “weight is something you are always working on from day one.”

With the AH-64 D-model Apache, “we did a lot of analogue to digital and we did a lot of situational enhancements to the aircraft, but we kept the structure relatively common, that put a little weight on it,” Smith said.

With Block III upgrades for Apache, Smith said, the idea is to give pilots back their “sports car.”

Pilots “want the speed and the maneuverability to really come back and only get better from what they had with their A-model days,” Smith said.

Through using advanced materials, some wiring enhancements where the company removed over a thousand feet of wiring, reducing parts by better-value engineering and “at the same time kicking it up a notch with composite main rotor blades, the enhanced drive system,” Smith said, buys back payload space and maneuverability.

Smith added Boeing is looking ahead at what will follow the Echo-model Apache, which will be the bridge to the Army’s Future Vertical Lift program, a family of helicopters to come online in the 2030s. “We got some pretty cool concepts that will be a game changer when it comes to drag on the aircraft from the current configuration,” she noted, adding, "stay tuned."

And for Boeing’s Chinook program, new composite rotorblades and other improvements should give the aircraft 1,500 pounds of additional thrust operating in a hot environments at high altitudes, according to Col. Rob Barrie, the Army’s program manager for cargo helicopters.

Because fuel tanks are now self-healing, the Chinook no longer needs six separate tanks and will reduce to two, one on each side of the aircraft, Barrie said. This will reduce the aircraft weight by about 100 pounds.

Other improvements will increase the gross weight of the aircraft from 50,000 pounds up to 54,000 pounds, which buys back more payload or fuel, he added.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
good luck
Senate confirms first female combatant commander
Senators confirmed Air Force Gen. Lori Robinson as the new head of U.S. Northern Command during wrap-up work late Thursday, making her the first woman to serve as a combatant commander.

Robinson’s confirmation was approved without opposition before lawmakers started their weeklong congressional recess. Lawmakers also confirmed Army Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti to serve as the new head of U.S. European Command and Army Gen. Vincent Brooks to lead U.S. Forces Korea.

All of the nominees faced friendly questioning during their nomination hearings earlier this month, and positive reviews from members of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Robinson previously served as commander of Pacific Air Forces. She is a senior air battle manager with more than 900 flight hours in the E-3B/C and E-8C aircraft, and has previously held leadership roles in U.S. Air Forces Central Command and Air Combat Command.

Earlier this month, Time listed her as one of its 100 most influential people for 2016. Iraq War veteran Rep. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., wrote in the magazine that Robinson’s appointment to the new post “makes clear to every female lieutenant that the top jobs are now open to them.”

Scaparrotti, previously the top U.S. general in Korea, has served as director of the Joint Staff, deputy commander of U.S. Forces Afghanistan and commanding general of the 82nd Airborne Division.

Brooks was serving as commander of U.S. Army Pacific before his new assignment and has held leadership posts in Germany, South Korea, Kosovo and the Middle East.

Confirmation for the three generals took slightly more than a month since their nominations were announced. Senators have not moved nearly as fast with civilian defense posts, with several service secretary positions staying vacant for months due to political infighting.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top