US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

kwaigonegin

Colonel
It is a question of strategy. Given limited resources, which is always the case, how should a military expend the resources for the greatest return for the national interests. And what would be the likely response by the adversary and how would it change the strategic calculation.

We are not talking about defending against attack with multiple missiles here, we are talking about defense against MIRV. NK is nowhere close to the stage where they have the miniaturized warhead and missile technology necessary for MIRV. Iran is of course much further behind, especially in light of the recent deal.

Both Russia and China obviously saw the US missile defense as a threat to their deterrent capability to protest. That is especially true in case of China, which only deploy a minimal deterrent force with clear no first strike policy. China apparently felt threatened enough by the US missile defense development to began MIRV deployment on a few of its DF-5 missiles recently. Now this news about contract to develop defense against MIRV. One can only draw one logical conclusion.

Now we have to remember most analysts in the field assume that China had the technology for MIRV for many years but never deployed until now. Clearly China doesn't want to enter into an arms race and has deferred deployment until development in the US threatened its minimal deterrence force. Should the US continue it MIRV defense research, we can only assume that China will deploy larger number of MIRV to overwhelm the defense, something well within its capability.

So we are left asking what is the point of US MIRV defense research? It can't possible defend against Russian missile force nor can't it realistically defend against China which already have the technology and resources waiting for deployment. It doesn't make the US more secure against NK or Iran which doesn't MIRV technology can are not likely to have that technology in the near future. The only result would be a renewed arms race that will make all nations in the world less secure, and the only ones that profit are the arms makers who get the contract.

R & D in missile defense is always an ongoing process. It's not about having a solution today but rather keeping it ongoing to improve the defenses of the homeland. If you only start r &d by the time an actual threat appears it would have already been too late.

Some of the research may yield results that can be integrated into current subsystems w/o deploying it in it's entirety.

Personally I think the greatest threat from WMD to the US homeland wouldn't come from exoatmospehric vehicles but rather in the back of a u-haul or inside an old rusty cargo container.
 

navyreco

Senior Member

Aug. 1, 2015 - On August 1st as part of a joint Missile Defense Agency/US Navy missile defense test, a BQM-74E cruise missile target was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) on Kauai, Hawaii. The USS John Paul Jones detected, tracked, and successfully engaged the target using an SM-6 Dual I missile. The SM-6’s proximity-fuze warhead was programmed not to detonate after reaching the lethal distance from the target, thus providing the ability to recover and reuse the BQM-74E target. This was the fourth and final event in a series of joint Missile Defense Agency/US Navy missile defense tests.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Happy-Birthday-USS-Bonhomme-Richard.jpg

Naval Today said:
Forward-deployed amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) celebrated its 17th birthday August 15.

Bonhomme Richard is the third commissioned ship to bear the storied name USS Bonhomme Richard.

The ship is named after the aged revolutionary war ship on loan from the King of France which Captain John Paul Jones sailed into history.

That name and its history lives on today in the modern forward-deployed amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) forward-deployed to Sasebo, Japan.

Today’s modern Bonhomme Richard was commissioned August 15th, 1998, in Pensacola,

The US Navy has several commands forward deployed in Japan at Yokosuka and Sasebo.

The Bonhomme Richard, LHD-6 is the flagship of Expeditionary Strike Group 7.

All in all, the following US Navy vessel force commands are forward deployed to Japan:

US 7th Fleet Headquarters
Carrier Strike Group 9 (with Carrier Air Wing 5)
Expeditionary Strike Group 7
Destroyer Squadron 7
Destroyer Squadron 15
Mine Countermeasure Squadron 7

The major combatants that are included and are forward deployed to Japan include:

USS Ronald Reagan, CVN-67
USS Blue Ridge LCC-19
USS Bonhomme Richard, LHD-6
USS Green Bay LPD-20
USS Germantown LSD-42
USS Ashland LSD-48
USS Antietam CG-54
USS Shiloh CG-67
USS Curtis Wilbur DDG-54
USS John McCain DDG-56
USS Fitzgerald DDG-62
USS Stetham DDG-63
USS Lassen DDG-82
USS McCampbell DDG-85
USS Mustin DDG-89
USS Chief MCM-14
USS Patriot MCM-7
USS Warrior MCM-10
USS Pioneer MCM 9

That's a lot of US Navy power in Japan.
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
This article sounds a little sensational. It is from the National Interest, but I'll post it anyhow.

The U.S. Navy appears to have a new low-cost plan to counter Iran’s fleet of speedboats.

OB2hJMu.jpg

Image: Flickr/
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


As part of its asymmetric naval doctrine, Iran has amassed a fleet of Fast Inshore Attack Craft (FIAC) and speedboats equipped with anti-ship cruise missiles. The strategy aims to overwhelm U.S. warships operating in the Persian Gulf through the use of swarm tactics.

All signs suggest that this strategy could be highly efficient for Iran. As Brett Davis has
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Center for International Maritime Security blog:

In 2002, a joint war game exercise, known as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(MC02), took place to gauge readiness in the event of a conflict with a hostile Middle Eastern nation. The results were disastrous for the U.S., with over a dozen ships destroyed and thousands killed or wounded as a result of asymmetric and unconventional naval warfare. 14 years later, Iranian asymmetrical warfare can still have a devastating effect on U.S. and allied forces in the Middle East.

The United States has thus been at pains trying to devise an effective strategy to deal with Iran’s swarm tactics. One aspect of the problem is that using Tomahawk or Harpoon missiles could prove awfully expensive as these missiles cost millions of dollars, far more than the Iranian speedboats.

As such, one possible solution the U.S. Navy has trumpeted in recent years is the use of lasers or kinetic-energy weapons. Indeed, it is notable that the first ship to carry laser weapons, the USS Ponce, is deployed in the Middle East.

Unlike most missiles, lasers are extremely cheap, costing only a few cents to fire. Moreover, whereas only a finite number of missiles can be carried on a ship, lasers give U.S. naval vessels a near infinite number of ammunition. This is particularly important when dealing with the threat of a swarm of Iranian speedboats.

Lasers are not the only potential solution to the Iranian speedboat problem that the U.S. Navy is contemplating, however. One other venture is integrating the Longbow Hellfire missile system, designated the Surface-to-Surface Missile Module (SSMM), onto America’s Littoral Combat Ships.

In that vein, the U.S. Navy
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the first test of the Longbow Hellfire missile system from a Littoral Combat Ship. The tests, which were announced at the end of last month, took place in mid-June, according to a Navy press release.

“During the mid-June tests off the coast of Virginia, the modified Longbow Hellfire missiles successfully destroyed a series of maneuvering small boat targets. The system "hit" seven of eight targets engaged, with the lone miss attributed to a target issue not related to the missile's capability,” the press release said.

The Navy also explained in that statement that the test was designed to simulate engage numerous fast-attack speedboats like the ones used by Iran. “Termed Guided Test Vehicle-1, the event was designed to specifically test the Longbow Hellfire launcher, the missile, and its seeker versus high speed maneuvering surface targets (HSMSTs). The HSMSTs served as surrogates for fast inshore attack craft that are a potential threat to Navy ships worldwide.”

As Motley Fool
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, “Each Hellfire has a five-mile range, and will be self-guiding (i.e., "fire-and-forget"). Once a threat is detected by shipboard or airborne radars, a Hellfire can be launched to destroy the target.”

Each LCS will be able to hold 24 Longbow Hellfire missiles, according to Motley Fool. One advantage the Longbow Hellfire missiles hold over other missiles considered, most notably the Raytheon’s Griffin IIB missile, was that its “fire and forget” feature allowed numerous missiles to be fired simultaneously. This was a point that Rear Adm. John Ailes, the then-program manager for LCS Mission Modules (PMS 420), emphasized when announcing that the Longbow Hellfire missiles had been chosen for the LCS’ SSMM.

“We have these 10,000 [Longbow] missiles, there’s no cost risk at all, it’s vertically launchable and you can shoot lots of them at same time and you don’t have to do that thing where you keep the laser on it,” Ailes
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. That will be crucial in dealing with the Iranian speedboat threat.

The Navy press release from last month also emphasized this point, stating: “Integration of the ‘fire-and-forget’ Longbow Hellfire missile on LCS represents the next evolution in capability being developed for inclusion in the Increment 3 version of the surface warfare mission package for LCS. When fully integrated and tested, each 24-shot missile module will bring added firepower to complement the LCS's existing 57mm gun, SEARAM missiles and armed MH-60 Sea Hawk helicopter”

The SSMM will be fully integrated and deployed on the LCS starting in 2017.

Link:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Back to bottling my Grenache
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Malay-Carat-2015.jpg

Naval Today said:
The 21st annual Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) exercise between the U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, and the Malaysian Armed Forces began Aug. 17 with opening ceremonies in Sandakan, Malaysia.

CARAT Malaysia 2015 consists of five days of shore-based and at-sea training events, designed to address shared maritime security concerns, build relationships, and enhance interoperability among participating forces.

CARAT is a series of bilateral naval exercises between the U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, and the armed forces of Bangladesh, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Timor-Leste.

The US continues to march through South East Asia with its long standing Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) exercises. This month it is Malaysia's turn.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
This article sounds a little sensational. It is from the National Interest, but I'll post it anyhow.

The U.S. Navy appears to have a new low-cost plan to counter Iran’s fleet of speedboats.

OB2hJMu.jpg

Image: Flickr/
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


In that vein, the U.S. Navy
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the first test of the Longbow Hellfire missile system from a Littoral Combat Ship. The tests, which were announced at the end of last month, took place in mid-June, according to a Navy press release.

“During the mid-June tests off the coast of Virginia, the modified Longbow Hellfire missiles successfully destroyed a series of maneuvering small boat targets. The system "hit" seven of eight targets engaged, with the lone miss attributed to a target issue not related to the missile's capability,” the press release said.

Each LCS will be able to hold 24 Longbow Hellfire missiles, according to Motley Fool. One advantage the Longbow Hellfire missiles hold over other missiles considered, most notably the Raytheon’s Griffin IIB missile, was that its “fire and forget” feature allowed numerous missiles to be fired simultaneously.

The SSMM will be fully integrated and deployed on the LCS starting in 2017.
Good article that further details the news and pics of the exercise held a few weeks ago reported here on this thread and in the LCS thread. Here's a pic from the actual exercise where three fast boats were destroyed together.

web_150617-N-EW716-001.jpg

They have since held exercises with the same SSMM package using the 30mm guns, the 57mm guns, and I believe even the SeaRAM missiles to destroy swarming fast boats.
 
Last edited:

Miragedriver

Brigadier
Good article that further details the news and pics of the exercise held a few weeks ago reported here on this thread and in the LCS thread. Here's a pic from the actual exercise where three fast boats were destroyed together.

They have since held exercises with the same SSMM package using the 30mm guns, the 57mm guns, and I believe even the SeaRAM missiles to destroy swarming fast boats.

I imagine the cost of the Longbow Hellfire missile is more than the $100,000 for the regular AGM-114 and that the range of five miles is also increase.

Ship launched fire and forget, wow! I imagine that Navy/Marine Corp helicotpers will also be partoling in the area (picture below of AGM-114 on
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)
2qx75uO.jpg



Back to bottling my Grenache
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


150814-N-JQ696-031.jpg

Sea Waves said:
An MQ-4C Triton is lifted inside Patuxent River's anechoic chamber for electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing.

This event marked the first time that an unmanned aircraft inside the chamber was controlled from an external ground control station. T

riton's EMC testing will continue for the next eight weeks to verify the aircraft's subsystems can operate without interfering with each other.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


F-22-closeup-during-refueling.jpg

Aviationist said:
Although they were not conceived to play this kind of role, F-22 Raptors have emerged as some of the U.S.-led Coalition’s most reliable combat assets in supporting coalition planes during air strikes in Syria and Iraq.

At the beginning of July, U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor jets
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Little more than a month ago, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
deployed to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
had dropped 270 bombs on targets located in 60 of the 7,900 locations hit by the other aircraft supporting
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Even though the largest number of air strikes is carried out by other assets, it looks like the role played by the F-22 is pivotal to ensure the safety of the other aircraft involved in the air campaign: the Raptors act as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
escorting strike packages into and out of the target area while gathering details about the enemy systems and spreading intelligence to other “networked” assets supporting the mission to improve the overall situational awareness.

“We are operating regularly in Iraq and Syria. The F-22’s advanced sensors and low-observable characteristics enable us to operate much closer to non-coalition surface-to-air missiles and fighter aircraft with little risk of detection,” said Lt. Col. J. (name withheld for security reasons) in a recent 380th Air Expeditionary Wing release. “We provide increased situational awareness for other coalition aircraft while simultaneously delivering precision air-to-ground weapons. This allows us to reduce the risk to our forces while mitigating the risk to civilian casualties, one of our highest priorities in this conflict. It is a true multirole aircraft.”

In simple words, the F-22 pilot leverage advanced onboard sensors to collect valuable details about the enemy Order of Battle, then they share the “picture” with attack planes, command and control assets, as well as Airborne Early Warning aircraft, while escorting other manned or unmanned aircraft towards the targets. As happened when they facilitated the retaliatory air strikes conducted by the Royal Jordanian Air Force F-16s after the burning alive of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Needless to say, every now and then they can also attack their own targets using Precision Guided Munitions: two 1,000-lb GBU-32 JDAMs (Joint Direct Attack Munitions) or 8
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
“which have been successfully employed against key ISIL targets. [The SDB] is extremely accurate from very long distances and has the lowest collateral damage potential of any weapon in our inventory.”

Therefore, although this may not be what the F-22 was conceived for, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is excelling in a new role: making other aircraft more survivable in contested airspaces like Syria and Iraq.

Watch KC-135 refueling an F-22 Raptor:

 

navyreco

Senior Member
U.S. Navy SEALs Will Open to Women According to Top U.S. Navy Admiral
The U.S. Navy is planning to open its elite SEAL teams to women who can pass the grueling training regimen, the service's top officer said Tuesday, August 18, 2015, in an exclusive interview. Adm. Jon Greenert said he and the head of Naval Special Warfare Command, Rear Adm. Brian Losey, believe that if women can pass the legendary six-month Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL training, they should be allowed to serve.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top