US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

interesting ...
As an example, imagine the Air Force has to pay $50 million per engine set and that would provide $5 million in operational savings. In 10 years, that would pay for itself. But that $50 million cost comes out of procurement and the $5 million in savings goes into operations, making it hard to argue for modernization in times of constrained budgets.
according to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
interesting ...

according to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Amazing! Did you know that the requirements by the USAF for the B-52 were set out in the days after the end of WWII and the aircraft made it's maidan flight in 1952, that was a very very long time ago the world was so different back

B-52 is due to serve well into mid century and could possibles mark 100 years of flight!! Wow

Anyhow back to the link, see that just shows sheer greed, you need to invest to make a saving yet since the investor and saver are two different entity's they are not likely to go ahead with the investment

This is the commercial side of the military procurement and I think a more powerful body should be able to intervene here and say listen we are going ahead with the engine replacement programme

Even although the programme makes good financial sense due to nature of the deal it may not go ahead a big shame

We do know the procurement budget and operations budget are different but they shouldn't be so different that it starts to effect policy of modernisation
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Boeing has been pushing for re-engining B52 for almost a decade now. they want to use 747 derived engines.
Speaking of B52. A B52 driver just hit 9000 flight hours on one.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Air Force jet, crew lands in Pyongyang to pick up freed prisoner
Oct. 21, 2014 - 04:27PM |
0 Comments

A
A
An Air Force passenger jet, right, is parked on the tarmac of Sunan International Airport in Pyongyang, North Korea, on Oct. 21. The State Department says Jeffrey Fowle, one of three Americans being held in North Korea, has been released.
An Air Force passenger jet, right, is parked on the tarmac of Sunan International Airport in Pyongyang, North Korea, on Oct. 21. The State Department says Jeffrey Fowle, one of three Americans being held in North Korea, has been released. (Wong Maye-E / AP)

By Brian Everstine
Staff writer
FILED UNDER
News
World News
An Air Force executive jet and aircrew from Joint Base Pearl-Harbor, Hickam, was tasked with landing in North Korea today and picking up an American prisoner who was released by the Pyongyang regime.

Detainee Jeffrey Fowle was released after almost six months on charges that he left a Bible in a nightclub. Associated Press photographers spotted the Air Force aircraft, which appeared by a C-40, at Pyongyang's international airport.

The Swedish government helped negotiate Fowle's release.

Pentagon spokesman Rear Adm. John Kirby said today that the Air Force crew flew at the request of the State Department "to affect the transportation of Mr. Fowler out of Korea."

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said North Korea specified a schedule for the American aircraft to come in and pick up Fowle.

The 65th Airlift Squadron at Hickam flies the C-40, which is used to transport leadership and other distinguished visitors.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Aviation Week
Northrop Grumman Protests Air Defense Radar Loss

AWIN First
Amy Butler
Tue, 2014-10-21 13:38
Northrop Grumman is protesting its loss of a contract potentially worth $1 billion to Raytheon to design and build the next-generation air defense radar for the U.S. Air Force.

Randy Belote, a company spokesman, declined to say why Northrop lodged the protest Oct. 21 with the U.S. Government Accountability Office. But he confirmed the protest had been filed.

Lockheed Martin also lost its bid. Spokeswoman Rashi Ratan stuck to the company’s statement from last week when the contract was awarded. "We are disappointed to learn the U.S. Air Force has not selected us for the 3DELRR program. We believe we presented a competitive and affordable solution."

Both companies were debriefed on their losses last week, Air Force spokesman Justin Oakes says.

Typically, the service is required to stop work on the winning contract while auditors review the source selection. Air Force officials halted Raytheon's work upon receiving notification of the protest.

Though Raytheon’s existing contract is worth only $19.5 million for the development and delivery of the first three Three-Dimensional Expeditionary Long-Range Radars (3DELRRs), potential sales could reach as high as $1 billion with full-rate production. Additionally, Air Force Lt. Col. Kevin Sellers says 50-100 radars could be purchased from foreign allies, adding to the value of the work.

The Air Force plans to buy 35 of the C-band active electronically scanned array radars to replace old TPS-75s operating in the S-bands.

Andrew Hajek, Raytheon’s 3DELRR program director, attributes his company’s win to Raytheon’s 15-year investment in a foundry to develop and produce Gallium Nitride (GaN) semiconductors, which offer improved power output over older Gallium Arsenide system.

TriQuint in Texas and Cree in North Carolina manufacture GaN products, but are not solely dedicated to defense applications. Raytheon decided this work should be vertically integrated into the company, and it has apparently paid off.

Raytheon also won the Navy’s Air and Missile Defense Radar competition as well as its Next-Generation Jammer system, both based on GaN technologies. Lockheed Martin recently won the Air Force’s Space Fence S-band radar contract as well.

Northrop Grumman, however, has struggled to win large-face radar work, making this latest loss more serious for the company’s long-term radar sector strategy.

Source URL:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Aviation Week
NavWeek: Pacific Fit

Tue, 2014-10-21 12:02
With the recent commissioning of the amphibious assault ship LHA 6 USS America in its new San Diego home, the U.S. Navy may be getting ready to soon deploy a perfect kind of ship to roam the waters of the Asia-Pacific.

With its heavy concentration of aviation power – built mostly around MV-22 Ospreys and the much-anticipated F-35B Joint Strike Fighters – the ship will provide a longer-range, deeper-strike capability than other amphibs, says Marine Maj. Gen Robert Walsh, director of Navy expeditionary warfare, as well as provide that ubiquitous presence so craved by Navy and Marine strategists.



America’s redesign will make it possible for the ship to perform certain missions and operations for a longer time, a big plus in the expansive Pacific.

“It’s such a vast region, Walsh tells Aviation Week. “Aviation gives you so much capability.”

And America is built to keep its aircraft flying. “It has bigger hangars,” Walsh notes. “It has a larger aviation storage weapons area than we have now. We have much more storage on LHA 6 than we did on previous on big-deck amphibs.”

That extra room opens up bigger doors, especially with the MV-22s and the F-35Bs, he says.

“We start talking about the ranges we can operate with the MV-22s,” he says.

“The Ospreys fit perfectly for those types of missions when you can launch with a range much farther and earlier-on because of the distances they can go. The ships can get you into a region and the Ospreys can launch from much father out.”

And the benefits continue close to the coast, too.

“When you get closer, the Ospreys can range much farther inland,” Walsh says.

“Having those Ospreys will increase the aviation capabilities. The tiltrotor capability is something you want in the Pacific because it’s such a vast AOR [area of responsibility]. Then when we start putting F-35s on the America -- with double the fuel capacity -- you’ll be able to generate much more sorties in a set time period.”

It will be a brutal one-two punch for foes, he says, “when you start talking about both fixed-wing and tiltrotor aircraft.”

He adds, “The ship is tailored toward more aviation -– more maintenance, storage and weapons capacity. It’s going to keep you up tempo -– it ups the offensive punch we should have. Other big-decks have it, but not at the level the America will have with its more aviation-centric focus.”

Some of the operational concepts, Walsh says, will hearken back to the Marine glory days in the Pacific during World War II. “It’s interesting to look back in history and compare this to the CVs [carriers] of World War II and CVEs or the escort carriers we had. We did a lot of great things during World War II with operations independently of the carrier strike group, but also in conjunction with those carriers. And those escort carriers were tasked in many cases to support Marine amphibious landings throughout the Central Pacific.

Which is kind of what the America is tied to today -– the Marines are going to be aboard, they will be part of the Marine Expeditionary Units, part of amphibious task forces.”

That kind of power, scope and flexibility, he says, sends a message. “It’s a signal we’re putting our best forward because of the President’s and CNO’s [Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert] attempts to rebalance to put more of our ships and best capacity [into the Pacific]. It’s a signal, that we’re putting this out there first.”

Again, what make this ship even more special is the aviation potential going on it. “It’s a conscious decision to put America out there to San Diego and the forward deploy into the Pacific along with F-35s and Ospreys,” Walsh says.

“We’re putting our F-35s there in Japan first.”

Marines, F-35s, Ospreys and an amphibious ship like the America certainly will put U.S. foes and friends alike on notice about American intentions in the region.

Anyone who doubts the seriousness and resolve of the U.S. shift back to the Pacific should consider the words of Leon Panetta, former defense secretary when the Obama administration made the move. In his recent book, “Worthy Fights,” Panetta writes, “By far the most important strategic decision we made was to rebalance the focus of our military toward the Asia-Pacific region.”

Deploying big gray hulls like the America to the region underscores that importance.

“You have to have these platforms to deter potential conflicts, to reassure allies and to do all the things that presence requires," Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said in late September during a speech at the University of Pennsylvania.

Later in the month, he told defense writers during a breakfast roundtable: “Those great gray hulls will be on the horizon we will be virtually everywhere in the Pacific.”

In this case, being there is vitally important.

“Our allies and partners want to see a ship on the horizon,” says Brian Schires, vice president of Rolls-Royce North America and chairman of the Amphibious Warship Industrial Base Coalition. “Now, that’s presence! They want to see an aircraft carrier with escorts or an LHA with its escorts. Presence means presence. Virtual presence is no presence. We have to be there, in theater, and on station.”

Source URL:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Now all ABM, hmm i don't think.

U.S. Navy's Overseas Force Structure Changes Underscore Commitment to the Asia-Pacific
According it for 2017 7th Fleet get 2 new Burke ABM : USS Benfold (DDG 65), USS Milius (DDG 69)
and USS Barry (DDG 52) will conduct a hull swap with USS Lassen (DDG 82) no ABM.

Increases by 2 Burke, important. 7 to 9.

Actually 7th Fleet get 2 CG, 1 ABM and 7 DDG, 4 ABM.

Only Burke Fl I/II are equiped with SM-3 no Fl IIA/Austin.
 
Top