US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Wtf ? Is this really possible ? :confused:

-------------------------------------



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Relax!! this is based on the Pentagon's 2 war doctrine of force realignment and redeployment. The analysis is based on how fast Army divisions would be able to relocate and redeploy from their peacekeeping mission, retrain on home bases, and ship off to a second of two, large conflicts like the 1st Gulf War.

Also far from being an expert but the Army needs to get their act together if what the report says is true and not politically motivated. The Marines have two combat ready MAGTF (Marine Air-Ground Task Force) self contain units that consist of Marine Expeditionary Force, armor, air assets, logistics and command that can be in a hot zone anywhere on the globe within 96 hours after POTUS gives the order.

I don't want to hate on the Army but the Marines has older equipment, many are hand me downs from the Army, much much less budget and they are a lot more ready than their Army counterparts in combat readiness and deployment. I will say that the Army do have longer legs than the Marines in terms of fighting long protracted war however in the world we live in today COIN operations are crucial and I'm afraid the Army has abandoned much of their training and capabilities in fighting short high intensity conflicts. Luckily the Marines are still very well adapt to fighting these type of wars.

Personally I think more $$ needs to go to places like the VA because our veterans are treated like crap post conflict.

Sorry for the OT.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
[video=youtube_share;8-TyJO1HhuM]http://youtu.be/8-TyJO1HhuM[/video]
Since Reco is too busy to grace us. I figured lets see some cool vids.
[video=youtube;3q9t2N48OY0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3q9t2N48OY0&feature=share&list=PLGIaDi4Rq8NwSleaoOuLfbVjMgOOFIcrU[/video]
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
[video=youtube;gxIsNZHHCvQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxIsNZHHCvQ&feature=share&list=PLGIaDi4Rq8NwSleaoOuLfbVjMgOOFIcrU[/video]
[video=youtube;hcAPN0umb8w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcAPN0umb8w&feature=share&list=PLGIaDi4Rq8NwSleaoOuLfbVjMgOOFIcrU[/video]
Part 2
 

thunderchief

Senior Member
More talks about budget cuts , including reducing number of F-35s ordered next year :

Automatic budget cuts could hit Pentagon harder this year

(Reuters) - Months after the U.S. military was hit with a $37 billion budget cut that threw it into turmoil and confusion, the Pentagon is headed into the new fiscal year facing a similar threat that could have even more devastating consequences, officials say.

The budget deal that ended the government shutdown this month let the Pentagon continue spending at an annualized level of $496 billion in the 2014 fiscal year that began on October 1.

That is about $31 billion below what President Barack Obama requested for 2014, but about $21 billion above the caps set by the Budget Control Act of 2011, meaning the Pentagon faces another across-the-board cut unless Congress reaches a new spending deal that changes the law by mid-January.

And the situation could get worse. Under the 2011 budget act, defense spending is expected to begin growing again in 2015. But a top defense budget analyst said on Thursday that based on historical trends from previous military cutbacks, Pentagon spending could shrink to as low as $415 billion.

Todd Harrison, an analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments think tank, said a drop of that magnitude would force a huge cut in the size of the military, cause the cancellation of many weapons programs and lead many defense companies to go out of business.

"This would be, you know, catastrophic, if you will, for a lot of procurement programs. There would be a lot of glass on the floor at the end of this. You'd break a lot of things," he told reporters at a briefing on the 2014 defense budget.

Harrison said he was not predicting that scenario would actually take place, but looking at what could happen if the current defense drawdown followed the pattern of cutbacks after the end of the Cold War, the Vietnam war and the Korean war.

Defense officials paint a grim picture of the impact the budget uncertainty is having on their ability to ensure the military is prepared for action in the future.

FEWER HELICOPTERS

Army Assistant Secretary Heidi Shyu told a panel in the House of Representatives on Wednesday that more automatic budget cuts this year could force the Army to buy 12 fewer Apache helicopters and 11 fewer Chinooks helicopters and delay upgrades to the Abrams tank and Bradley Fighting Vehicle.

William LaPlante, a principal deputy Air Force secretary, said the Air Force might have to drop plans to buy four or five of the 19 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters it was scheduled to purchase. Navy officials told the panel they would have to cancel much of their planned maintenance for ships and aircraft.

"What we've been experiencing over the last one-and-a-half to two years, frankly, has been extraordinarily destabilizing," said Sean Stackley, a Navy assistant secretary, noting that the uncertainty was unraveling efforts to cut contracting costs.

Automatic budget cuts under a mechanism known as sequestration, which reduces spending across all accounts regardless of their strategic importance, is causing "a steady decline" in military preparedness and ultimately national security, he said.

Harrison said the budget cuts that went into effect in March prompted the military to reduce spending for weapons programs and development. The Pentagon shifted some of that funding to current operations and training, essentially trading future preparedness to maintain the present force.

But even with that shift in funding for present operations, only two Army brigades are fully trained for combat in the event of a crisis, General Ray Odierno, the top Army officer, said this week.

Harrison urged the Pentagon to acknowledge that Congress, after two years of discord, is unlikely to reach a deal to lift the budget caps it set in 2011. He said by submitting budget plans that recognize the caps, the Pentagon could avoid the uncertainty of across-the-board cuts and plan more effectively.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
[video=youtube_share;8-TyJO1HhuM]http://youtu.be/8-TyJO1HhuM[/video]
Since Reco is too busy to grace us. I figured lets see some cool vids.
[video=youtube;3q9t2N48OY0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3q9t2N48OY0&feature=share&list=PLGIaDi4Rq8NwSleaoOuLfbVjMgOOFIcrU[/video]

Actually TerraN, that is Reco dressed up as swamp thing, and he's smoking a cigar as per Hannibal Smith of the A-Team, stare at the picture for 5 minutes, close your eyes, turn around twice and you can hear the buffer music from the hit TV-series, and yes I loved it, but not as much as black sheep squadron. brat
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Boeing, Lockheed Martin Team to Offer a New Bomber for the USAF


 October 25, 2013 at 22:37






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email this page

The future Long Range Strike Bomber could build upon the experience gained with the past Next Generation Bomber program. Boeing
The future Long Range Strike Bomber could build upon the experience gained with the past Next Generation Bomber program. Boeing

The Boeing Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation announced they are teaming again to compete for the United States Air Force’s (USAF) Long-Range Strike – Bomber (LRS-B) program, with Boeing acting as the prime contractor and Lockheed Martin as the primary teammate. The program is aimed at delivering 80-100 very stealthy, long-range bombers to the Air Force, with an initial operational capability in 2024-26, and with a unit cost ceiling of $550 million. In addition to the manned bomber capability the Long Range Strike (LRS) family of systems will also combined with other long endurance unmanned platforms and cruise missiles .

The two companies have teamed in 2008 to develop the ‘Next Generation Bomber’ program, but that team dissolved upon the program termination in 2010. The two companies have also partnered in the past on the F-22 Raptor stealth fighter, where Lockheed Martin was the prime and Boeing the primary team mate.

The Long Range Strike Bomber is one of USAF three top priorities programs. The other two are the F-35 produced by Lockheed martin and KC-46 flying tanker built by Boeing. Winning the bomber program would secure the two companies dominant position for decades. The team will compete against Northrop Grumman, the manufacturer of the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, also believed to be a prime contractor developing a secret stealth aircraft under another black program.

“Boeing and Lockheed Martin are bringing together the best of the two enterprises, and the rest of industry, in support of the Long-Range Strike Bomber program, and we are honored to support our U.S. Air Force customer and this important national priority,” said President and Chief Executive Officer Dennis Muilenburg, Boeing Defense, Space & Security. “Stable planning, along with efficient and affordable development and production approaches, enables our team to reduce development risk by leveraging mature technologies and integrating existing systems.”

The team brings together nearly two centuries of combined experience designing, developing and testing aircraft for defense customers around the world. The companies also bring expertise in integrating proven technologies, and their skilled workforces and critical infrastructure and scale, to meet the U.S. Air Force’s cost and schedule requirements. According to the joint announcement, the combined team will be able to produce unique and affordable solutions that could not be achieved without partnering.

“Building on decades of manned and unmanned weapon systems experience, we’re proud to bring our collection of technologies, capabilities and resources to affordably design, develop, produce and sustain the bomber program,” said Orlando Carvalho, Executive Vice President of Lockheed Martin Aeronautics. “We’re confident that our team will meet the well-defined system requirements and deliver a world-class next generation Long-Range Strike Bomber to the U.S. Air Force within the budget and timeframe required.”

Defense update

I prefer the Northrop concept but looks aren't everything.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Boeing, Lockheed Martin Team to Offer a New Bomber for the USAF


 October 25, 2013 at 22:37






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email this page

The future Long Range Strike Bomber could build upon the experience gained with the past Next Generation Bomber program. Boeing
The future Long Range Strike Bomber could build upon the experience gained with the past Next Generation Bomber program. Boeing

The Boeing Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation announced they are teaming again to compete for the United States Air Force’s (USAF) Long-Range Strike – Bomber (LRS-B) program, with Boeing acting as the prime contractor and Lockheed Martin as the primary teammate. The program is aimed at delivering 80-100 very stealthy, long-range bombers to the Air Force, with an initial operational capability in 2024-26, and with a unit cost ceiling of $550 million. In addition to the manned bomber capability the Long Range Strike (LRS) family of systems will also combined with other long endurance unmanned platforms and cruise missiles .

The two companies have teamed in 2008 to develop the ‘Next Generation Bomber’ program, but that team dissolved upon the program termination in 2010. The two companies have also partnered in the past on the F-22 Raptor stealth fighter, where Lockheed Martin was the prime and Boeing the primary team mate.

The Long Range Strike Bomber is one of USAF three top priorities programs. The other two are the F-35 produced by Lockheed martin and KC-46 flying tanker built by Boeing. Winning the bomber program would secure the two companies dominant position for decades. The team will compete against Northrop Grumman, the manufacturer of the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, also believed to be a prime contractor developing a secret stealth aircraft under another black program.

“Boeing and Lockheed Martin are bringing together the best of the two enterprises, and the rest of industry, in support of the Long-Range Strike Bomber program, and we are honored to support our U.S. Air Force customer and this important national priority,” said President and Chief Executive Officer Dennis Muilenburg, Boeing Defense, Space & Security. “Stable planning, along with efficient and affordable development and production approaches, enables our team to reduce development risk by leveraging mature technologies and integrating existing systems.”

The team brings together nearly two centuries of combined experience designing, developing and testing aircraft for defense customers around the world. The companies also bring expertise in integrating proven technologies, and their skilled workforces and critical infrastructure and scale, to meet the U.S. Air Force’s cost and schedule requirements. According to the joint announcement, the combined team will be able to produce unique and affordable solutions that could not be achieved without partnering.

“Building on decades of manned and unmanned weapon systems experience, we’re proud to bring our collection of technologies, capabilities and resources to affordably design, develop, produce and sustain the bomber program,” said Orlando Carvalho, Executive Vice President of Lockheed Martin Aeronautics. “We’re confident that our team will meet the well-defined system requirements and deliver a world-class next generation Long-Range Strike Bomber to the U.S. Air Force within the budget and timeframe required.”

Defense update

I prefer the Northrop concept but looks aren't everything.


Yeah I've read about it this morning. I can't wait to see the design concept of it, along with Northrop Grumman version as well.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Yeah I've read about it this morning. I can't wait to see the design concept of it, along with Northrop Grumman version as well.
Here are a couple of earlier concepts from Lockheed, Northrup Grumman and Boeing. However, currently, even the concept drawings are considered highly classified.


lockheed_martin_BMACK_1.jpg

Lockheed Martin Long Range Strike Concept

northrop_grumman_NGB_bomber_1-660x440.jpg

Northrup Gruman Long Range Strike Consept

lockheed_boeing_NGB_bomber_1.jpg

Boeing Long Range Strike concept

Not sure at this point (because of the classification) what the Lockheed/Boeing team is proposing now. All of the above photos were from 3-4 years ago.
 
Last edited:
Top