So the US military has also started developing air-to-air missiles with a range of 1,000+ kilometers.
I'm not certain if this apples to it, but the general rule is that the more you make of something, the less each individual items costs, since you fold the R&D and fixed costs into more units.$35 million to $40 million → Less than $1.5 million
24 missiles per year → 1,000 missiles per year
HOW?
"500 new-version LRHWs"$35 million to $40 million → Less than $1.5 million
24 missiles per year → 1,000 missiles per year
HOW?
I heard they are essentially new missiles and not the original LHRW.$35 million to $40 million → Less than $1.5 million
24 missiles per year → 1,000 missiles per year
HOW?
Aliexpress, duh$35 million to $40 million → Less than $1.5 million
24 missiles per year → 1,000 missiles per year
HOW?
NORINCO actually, delivery by PLAN in 30mins or you get a second free of charge.Aliexpress, duh
The seven-year contract, awarded by the U.S. Missile Defense Agency, will quadruple the interceptors’ production, according to a , in a time when U.S. lawmakers are for an increase in munitions procurement.
The contract moves forward the between the Defense Department and Lockheed Martin, accelerating the number of THAAD interceptors from 96 to 400 per year, roughly a fourfold increase.
In support of ramped-up production, the company broke ground on a new Munitions Production Center in Troy, Alabama, in March as well as a new Munitions Acceleration Center in Camden, Arkansas, in January as part of a $9 million investment through 2030 for weapons facilities across the country.
With how much its going to cost and how large in form its going to be, it would be worth tasking interceptors onto them before they reach their targets.So the US military has also started developing air-to-air missiles with a range of 1,000+ kilometers.