A strategic opportunity for China IF it has a competitive SSN design and can get the Bohai Shipyard submarine halls working at near full capacity.
US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.
- Thread starter tphuang
- Start date
I recall making a joke about a two-stage PL-15 a while back. Well, Boeing isn't joking.
Stratolaunch wraps critical design review, aims for hypersonic flight test in 2022
By Garrett Reim 1 October 2021
Stratolaunch, owner of the world’s largest aircraft, has completed a critical design review of its Talon-A hypersonic test vehicle.
The Mojave, California-based company plans to use its massive, six-engined Roc aircraft as a launch platform for hypersonic vehicles and missiles. The aircraft, which has a record-setting wingspan of 117m (385ft), was developed by Scaled Composites to air-launch rockets into orbit.
Stratolaunch says on 27 September that the competition of the critical design review puts it on track to flight test its Talon hypersonic vehicles in 2022. The high-speed unmanned air vehicles (UAV) would then enter service with potential government and commercial customers by 2023.
“The Talon-A vehicles are rocket-propelled, autonomous, reusable testbeds carrying customisable payloads at speeds above Mach 5,” says Stratolaunch. “This capability enables routine access to the hypersonic flight environment, which is critical for scientific research, technological development, and component demonstration.”
The US Department of Defense is in a hypersonic missile arms race with China and Russia. It is investing billions of dollars into developing different types of hypersonic missiles. Hypersonic is defined as anything flying faster than M5.
Yet, the Pentagon has a limited number of aircraft that are large enough and have enough lifting capacity to air-launch hypersonic missiles for test flights. The US Air Force often uses its Boeing B-52 Stratofortress, but that heavy bomber has other missions it must fulfil, limiting its availability. In light of the flight testing bottleneck, Stratolaunch wants to be a launch test-platform for hire.
The company says it has been building its Talon-A test vehicles in parallel with its critical design review. The airframe of the initial test vehicle, the Talon-A0, is complete and Stratolaunch is working to install subsystems in the UAV before functional testing in early 2022.
“It will serve as a pathfinder for mission operations, including a flight test demonstrating safe release and separation from the carrier aircraft,” says the firm.
A second vehicle, dubbed Talon-A1, is being assembled and will be the company’s first hypersonic-capable UAV.
Talon-A is 8.5m long, with a wingspan of 3.4m. It has a launch weight of about 2,720kg (6,000lb). The UAV is intended to fly up to M6 and then glide autonomously back to earth where it would land on a conventional runway. The company says it will also be capable of autonomous take-off from a conventional runway using its rocket engine.
Stratolaunch says the Talon-A will have instruments integrated into its airframe to obtain aerothermal and performance data. It will also be able to carry experimental payloads.
The behemoth Roc has only flown twice since 2019, but Stratolaunch plans to conduct additional flight tests in the coming months. After those flights, the company plans to install pylons under its centre wing for carrying three Talon-A vehicles at once.
“This unique capability enables multiple hypersonic flight opportunities on a single day or the near-simultaneous launch of three Talon vehicles, which may support specific operational scenarios,” says Stratolaunch.
It cost 4 million a piece. Why should maneuverability be a concern? However, rate of production and getting these assets to the war theatre might be a concern. It is RATO launched so even non military ships can be made to launch them in the future.
I like the Kratos Valkyrie. Even though the distributed warfare approach of US Navy by way of its surface fleet may falter, it's Navy Air Wing shows promise of disruption.
It was only prudent that China develop a system similar to it.
Quite a significant hit apparently, very close to catastrophic. In quite a sensitive part of the world.
The rumour mill is already blaming Chinese autonomous subs,
Pay attention Australia, you might want to install extra seat belt on yours.
the sea wolf is supposed to be darker than a black hole, you can't find it by any means, and the South China Sea is deep, it can't touch the bottom, it was not supposed to surface, then what happened?
Collision was definitely with a UUAV, anti-mine op gone wrong, or another submarine whether Chinese (PRC or ROC lol), Japanese, Russian, NATO, or American (unlikely).
Either that or the entire thing is a cover up or fabrication. If the collision with something happened in the SCS, it cannot possibly be with anything else. There are no giant random rocks 50m deep in the water, it doesn't get close to the bottom or risk getting far into littoral waters and the surfaces there, it isn't with a whale since a collision with a whale even if possible, would do no real damage to the submarine and definitely not injure any crew. Collision that injures crew would have to be extremely significant and against a very heavy thing. Possible small explosion from a UUAV or mine? They aren't giving any details and the whole thing could also be a fabrication.
Either that or the entire thing is a cover up or fabrication. If the collision with something happened in the SCS, it cannot possibly be with anything else. There are no giant random rocks 50m deep in the water, it doesn't get close to the bottom or risk getting far into littoral waters and the surfaces there, it isn't with a whale since a collision with a whale even if possible, would do no real damage to the submarine and definitely not injure any crew. Collision that injures crew would have to be extremely significant and against a very heavy thing. Possible small explosion from a UUAV or mine? They aren't giving any details and the whole thing could also be a fabrication.