US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
USN Riverene Squadron One trains for deployment to Iraq

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Sailors take to river for training they need to battle Iraqi insurgents

By LOUIS HANSEN, The Virginian-Pilot
© September 9, 2006

ELIZABETHTOWN, N.C. - There wasn't a drop of blue water for miles, as the Cape Fear River ran coffee-colored and swift.

And on Friday afternoon, it was owned by the Navy.

Using borrowed boats, tactics and trainers, Riverine Squadron One went through a final stretch of river patrol exercises deep in the North Carolina swamps.

The squadron, based at Little Creek Naval Amphibious Base, was one step closer to combat and months from giving the Navy a shallow water presence in Iraq.

Lt. Cmdr. Mike Egan, the squadron's executive officer, said the two months of training with Marines has taught the sailors basic infantry skills and readied them for close battle.

"They ought to get a Marine Corps uniform out of this," Egan said.

The sailors expect to deploy to Iraq in March. The Navy's first large-scale, active-duty brown water mission since the Vietnam War more than 30 years ago will assume a mission patrolling the Euphrates River in a 60-mile stretch north and south of Baghdad.

Combat veteran Marines are training the sailors for ambushes, mortar fire and the various ruses insurgents test on the Marines' river patrol boats.

The Marines started training 100 sailors in June at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina. The sailors have been through infantry, leadership and boat skills training.

Marine Maj. Roberto Martinez said they have been teaching the sailors real-life lessons from their multiple deployments to Iraq. The Marines have been patrolling the Euphrates since the early days of the Iraq war.

Marine Staff Sgt. Erick Hodge led a small boat platoon in Iraq in 2004. He's instructing the sailors on tactics and close combat along the Cape Fear River.

Hodge said the Marines swept islands and the river banks for weapons caches and disrupted insurgents from using the water to retreat. Eventually, the insurgents grew accustomed to the river patrols and began to set up ambushes.

Hodge said he wants to teach the sailors about the latest insurgent techniques and the importance of knowing the environment.

"They get tired of hearing me talk," he said.

The Navy force stood up in May at Little Creek, attracting sailors from across the fleet and special warfare commands.

About 220 will eventually deploy for a seven- to nine-month tour, allowing enough time for a second unit to gear up for the mission. Subsequent deployments are expected to be six months, Egan said.

The squadron is using Marine Corps patrol boats based on a Vietnam-era design. Eventually, the boats are expected to be turned over to the Navy.

Egan said one of the challenges was to bring a new mentality to the fleet sailors - alert, independent and ready for close-quarter fighting.

They also had to get ready for the heat and humping 60-pound back packs. Heat exhaustion temporarily knocked down a few sailors early in the infantry training, Egan said.

"We're not on this big ship at sea," he said. "We're in these small boats.... It's a serious environment."

Seaman Michael Huggins, 19, came to the river squadron from boot camp. So far, so good, he said.

His older brother drives a tank in the Army. They expect to be in Iraq at the same time next year. His mother's worried advice: "Keep your head up and stay safe."

Petty Officer 2nd Class Jeremiah Ketels left his ship, the Ponce, to become a river rat. Ketels has been in the Navy four years and wanted a new challenge.

Ketels, who lives in Portsmouth, serves as a coxswain for the five-man patrol boat. The training has forced him to learn other jobs - such as driving the boat and manning the three gun positions.

After more than two months of training, the boat crews have drawn close, he said.

"It's almost a brotherhood," Ketels said.

Reach Louis Hansen at (757)446-2322 or [email protected].
 

Attachments

  • lhpatrol0909a.jpg
    lhpatrol0909a.jpg
    45 KB · Views: 6
  • lhpatrol0909d.jpg
    lhpatrol0909d.jpg
    50.3 KB · Views: 4

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
this is not exactly American, but F-16 related news, so I will just put here. I wonder when Polish F-16s became the most capable fighters in NATO.
FORT WORTH, Texas, Sept. 15 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Ceremonies were held
today at Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) in Fort Worth, Texas, to commemorate the
Polish F-16 Peace Sky program. The ceremony marks an important production
milestone, demonstrating that the program is on schedule and on budget. When
delivered, the Polish F-16 will be the most advanced fighter aircraft in NATO.
Dignitaries attending the commemorative ceremony included Jaroslaw
Kaczynski, Prime Minister of the Republic of Poland; Anna Fotyga, minister of
foreign affairs; Radoslaw Sikorski, minister of national defense; Lt. Gen.
Stanislaw Targosz, commander of the Poland Air Force; and other senior Polish
officials. Representing the U.S. Government were U.S. ambassador to Poland
Victor Ashe; Gen. T. Michael Moseley, chief of staff of the U.S. Air Force;
and Bruce Lemkin, deputy undersecretary of the U.S. Air Force for
International Affairs. Hosting the ceremony were Ralph D. Heath, executive
vice president of Lockheed Martin and president of Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics, and June R. Shrewsbury, vice president of F-16 Programs.
"Poland is delighted to be taking delivery of an aircraft that will not
only transform our capabilities in the air but also those of our ground troops
and the Navy," said Minister of Defense Sikorski. "It will also significantly
bolster the operational capacity of our expeditionary forces."
The Poland Peace Sky Program began in April 2003. Today's rollout
commemorates the 48 F-16s that Lockheed Martin is producing for Poland. The
aircraft joins a fleet of more than 4,300 F-16s operated by 24 air forces
around the world.
"This is a great day for Poland and the United States," said Deputy
Undersecretary Lemkin. "The Polish Air Force now will be flying a frontline,
top-performance fighter, virtually the same F-16 being flown by the U.S. Air
Force. The Peace Sky program is the centerpiece of an enduring relationship
between our air forces and will allow us to train together, operate together,
fly together and learn from one another. These F-16s will provide the
foundation of interoperability that will enable us to carry out operations as
NATO and coalition partners."
Commander of the Poland Air Force Targosz expressed pride that Poland has
acquired such advanced F-16s. "The Poland Air Force is proud to accept our new
F-16 today," he said. "Poland now has the most technologically advanced F-16s
in NATO, strengthening not only the Poland Air Force, but improving our
interoperability with other F-16 operators in the NATO alliance."
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics President Ralph D. Heath recognized the vision
shared by the United States and Poland when the Peace Sky program began. "We
have a new NATO beginning today," he said. "Peace Sky is physical evidence of
the vision both our nations shared to take Poland and NATO to a new level with
this most capable, combat-proven, 21st century fighter."
The F-16 for Poland includes enhanced capabilities, modern technologies
and growth potential that will establish a foundation for the Poland Air Force
in the 21st century. "We have been on or ahead of schedule in all key events,"
said Lockheed Martin's Shrewsbury. "We will take every measure to ensure the
Poland Air Force achieves and maintains its highest levels of capability and
readiness while flying the F-16."
The Poland Peace Sky program includes 36 F-16Cs and 12 F-16Ds, all powered
by the Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229 engine. This first aircraft - a single-seat
F-16C model - was accepted by the U.S. government (as agent for Poland in the
Foreign Military Sales process) on March 30, one month ahead of schedule. The
U.S. government accepted the first two-seat F-16D version in June. The first
four aircraft will be ferried to Poland in November with the remainder
following in 2007 and 2008.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The F-16 is the choice of 24 nations. More than 4,300 aircraft have been
delivered worldwide from assembly lines in five countries. The F-16 program
has been characterized by unprecedented international cooperation among
governments, air forces and aerospace industries. Major upgrades to all F-16
versions are being incorporated to keep the fleet modern and fully supportable
over the aircraft's long service life.

Headquartered in Bethesda, Md., Lockheed Martin employs about 135,000
people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design,
development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology
systems, products and services. The corporation reported 2005 sales of $37.2
billion.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
not an earthshaking news, but USN is upgrading EA-6Bs
BETHPAGE, N.Y. (XFN-ASIA) - Defense contractor Northrop Grumman Corp. on
Tuesday said it got a $22 million order from the Navy to make spare attack
systems for the EA-6B Prowler aircraft .
Under the delivery order, Northrop will produce spares of the Improved
Capability III Airborne Electronic Attack system on the Prowler, which is used
by the Navy to jam hostile radar and communications.
Los Angeles-based Northrop will build the spares at its plant in Baltimore,
while its Bethpage, N.Y., facility will perform services under the contract.
Production work is slated for completion in December 2009.
The fixed-price order is part of an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity
contract received in March 2006.
Shares of Northrop Grumman fell 9 cents to $68.07 in afternoon trading on
the New York Stock Exchange.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
good news for the american military, looks like the two major projects - JSF an DDX are getting all the funding they need.

By Tony Capaccio
Sept. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Lockheed Martin Corp.'s Joint
Strike Fighter, the Pentagon's most expensive weapons program,
was spared a cut of more than $1 billion and a delay of as long
as one year in production of the first aircraft, a top lawmaker
said.
House and Senate lawmakers negotiating a final spending
measure for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1 approved a $447.4
billion defense budget calling for production of two of the
aircraft in fiscal 2007 and money to buy hard-to-make parts for
12 more aircraft in 2008.
The Senate had proposed to cut all the production funds and
to delay production for a year, into 2008. The exact amount of
money approved for the Joint Strike Fighter wasn't available
tonight, said Representative Bill Young of Florida, chairman of
the House defense appropriations subcommittee.
``It's very close to the House position,'' which proposed
cuts of about $378 million from the roughly $1.3 billion
production request, he said.
The budget negotiators also agreed to fund the Joint Strike
Fighter back-up engine made by a team of Rolls-Royce Group Plc
and General Electric Co., Young said.
The compromise includes $50 billion to pay for the wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan and an additional $20 billion for the
repair and upgrading of Army and Marine Corps equipment overused
in Iraq, Young said.
The negotiators also included a provision that bans the
overseas sale of Lockheed Martin's F-22A fighter. The company
was pushing for the end of a long-standing ban on export of the
stealth fighter.
Negotiators also approved the Navy's $2.5 billion request
to start simultaneous detailed design and construction next year
and in 2008 of the new DD(X) destroyer in the shipyards of
Northrop Grumman Corp., the Navy's largest shipbuilder, and
General Dynamics Corp, Young said.
``The Navy will be happy,'' Young said.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
US Army meets recruiting goals for FY 2006

FY=Fiscal year..

Contrary to popular believe the US Army has met it's recruiting goals.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


After a slip in 2005, Army meets recruiting goal with 8 days to spare

By Robert Burns
ASSOCIATED PRESS

2:38 p.m. September 21, 2006

WASHINGTON – The Army is ending its best recruiting year since 1997 and expecting similar success in 2007, despite the weight of grim war news from Iraq, Army Secretary Francis Harvey said Thursday.
In an Associated Press interview, Harvey said the Army will enlist its 80,000th soldier on Friday, reaching its goal for the year with eight days to spare. That is a considerable turnaround from last year when the Army missed its target for the first time since 1999 and by the widest margin in more than two decades.

At the start of this recruiting year, which began Oct. 1, 2005, many questioned whether the Army would reach 80,000, given the many alternative career options available to young people and the growing unpopularity of the Iraq war. But a package of new financial incentives, new recruiting approaches and a bigger recruiting corps did the trick.
Harvey said the Army would stick with the formula it used over the past 12 months, while adding a few new wrinkles for recruiters.

He described himself as “moderately optimistic” about reaching the 80,000 goal again next year. It is too early to know the final number for the current recruiting year, which ends Sept. 30, but Harvey said it would be the highest in nine years. Last year the Army fell short of its goal by the widest margin since 1979.

Harvey was flying to New York to personally enlist on Friday the 80,000th recruit – Shirley Salvi, 23, a Rutgers University graduate who will report to Fort Leonard Wood, Mo., to become an Army linguist or intelligence analyst.

The trend in recruiting is particularly important for the Army now because it is striving to expand its overall ranks. The expansion is fundamental to an Army plan that increases the number of combat brigades available for fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, thereby giving soldiers more breathing room between overseas tours.

The Army secretary said combat brigades now get, on average, only 14 months at home for every 12 months at war. The goal is 24 months at home for every 12 months at war, but Harvey said they currently are moving in the wrong direction. Not long ago, combat brigades were getting 18 months between war tours.

By the end of the budget year on Sept. 30, the active-duty Army expects to have a total of nearly 504,000 soldiers, up from 492,000 a year ago. A year from now it hopes to reach its goal of 512,000, but that will not happen if recruiting slips again. Harvey indicated he expects recruiting to remain strong in the coming year.

“We're sticking with all the improvements we made” over the past year, including a beefed up recruiting corps, Harvey said. “If we start seeing trends that we don't like, we may” add even more recruiters, he said.

There are now about 6,600 recruiters for the active-duty Army, up from 6,401 a year ago and 5,119 two years ago. The Army National Guard and Army Reserve also have greatly increased their recruiting corps.
 

The_Zergling

Junior Member
Ironically I'm sort of worried about the US army meeting its recruitment quotas, given the bad press about accepting more and more kids with previous criminal records, or failing in various aptitude tests, not to mention the increased allowed age limit for basic. No offense to you old guys here, of course.

It just makes you wonder exactly how they got all those kids to sign up, and what kind of blood are we getting into our armed forces.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Good By Tomcat.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

By Journalist 2nd Class Stephen Murphy, USS Theodore Roosevelt Public Affairs

ABOARD USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (NNS) -- A chapter in naval aviation history drew to a close Feb. 8 aboard USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) with the last recovery of an F-14 Tomcat from a combat mission.

Piloted by Capt. William G. Sizemore II, commander, Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 8, Fighter Squadron (VF) 213’s aircraft 204 was trapped at 12:35 a.m. and marked one of the final stages of the Navy’s transition from the F-14 to F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet.

“It’s the end of an era and it just kind of worked out that I was the last trap,” said Sizemore. “This is one of the best airplanes ever built, and it’s sad to see it go away. It’s just a beautiful airplane. It’s powerful, it has presence, and it just looks like the ultimate fighter.”

Lt. Bill Frank, a VF-31 pilot, also took part in the last mission, and is credited with being the last pilot to ever drop a bomb from an F-14 Tomcat.

“We were called on to drop, and that’s what we did,” said Frank. “It’s special and it’s something I can say I did, but what’s more important is the work of the Sailors who made it possible. They have worked so hard during this cruise to make every Tomcat operational.”

The decision to incorporate the Super Hornet and decommission the F-14 is mainly due to high amount of maintenance required to keep the Tomcats operational. On average, an F-14 requires nearly 50 maintenance hours for every flight hour, while the Super Hornet requires five to 10 maintenance hours for every flight hour.

“I don’t think there is anything better than a Tomcat, but it’s probably a good time for it to go away,” said Senior Chief Aviation Machinist’s Mate (AW) Gene Casterlin, VF-31. “The Navy is getting smaller and more efficient, and it will only get harder to maintain the Tomcat. But no matter what, the Tomcat is the sexiest airplane in the sky.”

The F-14 entered operational service with Navy fighter squadrons VF-1 Wolfpack and VF-2 Bounty Hunters aboard USS Enterprise (CVN 65) in September 1974. The Tomcat’s purpose was to serve as a fighter interceptor, and it eventually replaced the F-4 Phantom II Fighter, which was phased out in 1986.

During their final deployment with TR, VF-31 and 213 collectively completed 1,163 combat sorties totaling 6,876 flight hours, and dropped 9,500 pounds of ordnance during reconnaissance, surveillance, and close air support missions in support of OIF.

“As we near the end of the Tomcat’s last deployment, we are proud of our legacy and take solace in the fact that the Tomcat is going out at the top of its game, but also regret saying farewell to an old, revered and trusted friend," said Cmdr. Richard LaBranche, VF-31 commanding officer.

In keeping with its history of being adaptable to new challenges, the Tomcat soared to a new level during its last deployment when it became the first Navy aircraft to make use of the Remotely Operated Video Enhanced Receivers (ROVER) system in December of last year. The system allows for ground forces to view video via laptop computers which gives them the ability to view their surroundings from the aircrafts’ point of view in real time, and ultimately provides better reconnaissance and target identification, which are essential to combat air support missions in Iraq.

Previously, ROVER had been used by the Air Force, and with a few modifications from personnel of Naval Air Station Oceana, Va., and members from Naval Air Depot Jacksonville, Fla., it became one of the last great modifications to the Tomcat.

"From its inception, the Tomcat has been the icon of Naval Aviation with its striking appearance, speed, formidable lethality and versatility,” said LaBranche. “It is more capable today than at any other time during its existence because of the innovation, dedication, and tenacity of every maintainer and pilot who has ever been associated with it.”

VF-213 pilots who are making the transition to the Super Hornet will begin F/A-18F (double seat) training in April, and the squadron will be operational, or “safe for flight,” in September. VF-31 pilots who are making the transition will begin F/A-18E (single seat) training in October, and the squadron will be safe for flight in April 2007. This will make VF-31 the last official Tomcat squadron in the Navy.

Maintainers in both squadrons will be begin training to perform their specific maintenance job as it pertains to the Super Hornet, shortly following this deployment. Their training will last anywhere from six weeks up to seven months, depending on the type of maintenance skills involved.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Ironically I'm sort of worried about the US army meeting its recruitment quotas, given the bad press about accepting more and more kids with previous criminal records, or failing in various aptitude tests, not to mention the increased allowed age limit for basic. No offense to you old guys here, of course.

It just makes you wonder exactly how they got all those kids to sign up, and what kind of blood are we getting into our armed forces.

"Z" don't believe the hype.

"Z"..the part about criminal records is not true. The military long ago tightened it's standards about accepting people with criminal records. They are a security risk. They just do not. Do some slip by? I'm sure it happens. In addition the USAF, USN, USCG & USMC have not changed their standards.

Very few persons over the age of 25 join the US military. The Army has raised it's age limit and allows "Re-test" of the ASVAP(Armed services vocational apptidude test) test. Also they can recriut only 4% of lower test scorers.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Taking Exception Army Adheres To Recruiting Guidelines
posted 4/25/2006

Re: "Army lowers recruit standards," April 7:

This story draws wrong conclusions about the Army's recruiting standards and from my testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee in February. U.S. Army recruits serve our nation by answering the call of duty at a critical time for our country. The least-qualified category of applicants is not a "reject pool." Our soldiers are a cross section of America. The Army has always accepted a percentage of its recruits from this category.

The article implies that it is a disturbing trend that the number of recruits from the least-qualified category will increase 16 percent this year, from 2,476 in fiscal 2005 to 2,873. The number has risen because of an increase in the number of either actual or planned recruits from 2005 to 2006. The Army complies with the Department of Defense standard for allowable recruits from this category, which is 4 percent. So the increase from 2005 to 2006 is purely a function of the larger recruiting total.

The reported increase from 2001 to 2005 of soldiers accepted with some kind of waiver of the normal recruiting standards is correct, but misleading. The total percentage has increased overall because the number of recruits with a waiver for a medical issue or a misdemeanor has increased. However, these waivers are only granted after a thorough medial review or a review of the misdemeanor offense. More important, during this same period, the number of recruits requiring a waiver because of serious criminal misconduct or for drug and alcohol issues declined by 33 percent.

I continue to be proud of our soldiers, who volunteer to go into harm's way to protect our free way of life.

Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the U.S. Army, Washington

Editor's Note: The article by Jeff St. Onge and Jon Steinman appeared in the Current News Early Bird, April 7, 2006.
 

The_Zergling

Junior Member
"Z" don't believe the hype.

"Z"..the part about criminal records is not true. The military long ago tightened it's standards about accepting people with criminal records. They are a security risk. They just do not. Do some slip by? I'm sure it happens. In addition the USAF, USN, USCG & USMC have not changed their standards.

Very few persons over the age of 25 join the US military. The Army has raised it's age limit and allows "Re-test" of the ASVAP(Armed services vocational apptidude test) test. Also they can recriut only 4% of lower test scorers.

Good to hear some reassurance about this issue... of course I have still have some other reservations about whether or not these young men and women know exactly what they're getting into. From what I've seen recruiters aren't exactly eager to lay out the entire story, and it's very easy for kid fresh out of high school to bind himself to a contract that he does not completely understand, not realizing exactly how much power the Army has over him. (Not so clear about the other branches. But to my knowledge, the Army gives you a pretty lopsided deal in terms that can be used against you, the most famous one arguably being stop-loss.)
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Good to hear some reassurance about this issue... of course I have still have some other reservations about whether or not these young men and women know exactly what they're getting into. From what I've seen recruiters aren't exactly eager to lay out the entire story, and it's very easy for kid fresh out of high school to bind himself to a contract that he does not completely understand, not realizing exactly how much power the Army has over him. (Not so clear about the other branches. But to my knowledge, the Army gives you a pretty lopsided deal in terms that can be used against you, the most famous one arguably being stop-loss.)

The USMC has also used stop loss in certain cases. So have some Navy SEALS been held in service about 6 months over their experation of service. the Army has used it the most.

No young person should join the US military without consulting your parents first. If you live in a military area like North Carolina, Florida, San Diego, Seattle, Norfolk VA area there are lawyers that speicalize in military matters you can consult prior to enlisting.
 
Top