Fully integrate with US is exactly what they'd do and have done since at least Iraq 2003.
Liz Truss stood for something. It may have been something batshit mental, but it was something. BoJo only ever stood for himself.
Liz Truss stood for something. It may have been something batshit mental, but it was something. BoJo only ever stood for himself.
We should start taxing British tea consumption.
Just to let them know who's in charge.
Just so long as you don't send that ginger twunt back. Or James Corden.
Well. I make myself some RCS Estimates on Storm-Shadow/ Scalp-EG. Thing is very formidable indeed.
What software are used to make those visualizations?
Ansys HFSS. For the RCS modelings while the missiles are modeled in Blender 3D's. The raw data for RCS values however are processed in MS Excel.
They need to cease spending on education and NHS, and pump more money to the military.
The UK is at risk of losing its status of major NATO power due to its relatively small military, Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe General Tim Radford warned in an interview released on Tuesday.
Speaking to the Daily Telegraph, the NATO official outlined that the UK, which has enjoyed a position of influence within the US-led military bloc since its establishment after WWII, is now “in danger of not holding on” to it.
“I think we [the British military] are too small,” Radford said. He went on to describe the UK’s position within NATO as “fortunate,” but added: “I worry that if we don’t invest and we don’t build up our industrial base and we don’t lead as we should, we might lose that position.”
One of Radford’s major grievances is the declining numbers in the UK army, which is set to decrease to 73,000, according to plans announced as early as 2021. He also warned that the advanced technologies which London is heavily betting on are not capable of fully replacing military personnel.
“I think we’ve had a slight awakening after Ukraine, but we need to do a twin track approach,” Radford noted. While recognizing the importance of innovation in the military, he pointed out that this potential should “be underpinned with hard fighting power.”
“If someone comes toward you with a tank, you can’t cyber it away. You can’t cross a bridge with cyber. It needs to be balanced,” he said.
Radford’s remarks come after UK Defence Secretary Ben Wallace stated in January that the nation’s military is “hollowed out and underfunded.” That same month, Sky News reported that an unnamed senior US general privately told Wallace that the British military was no longer considered a top-level fighting force due to decades of defense cuts.
Despite this apparent criticism, in May, the Times reported that Wallace still planned to press forward with plans to cut the army’s size, intending to reduce the number of infantry in favor of artillery.
At the same time, the UK emerged as one of the most active supporters of Ukraine in its conflict with Russia, pledging £4.6 billion ($5.9 billion) in military assistance. It was also the first country to offer modern battle tanks to Kiev, later pledging to provide it with depleted-uranium shells, leaving Moscow furious.
UK warned of waning influence in NATO
The British military could lose its “fortunate” position in the alliance as its army downsizes, a senior bloc commander has claimedThe UK is at risk of losing its status of major NATO power due to its relatively small military, Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe General Tim Radford warned in an interview released on Tuesday.
Speaking to the Daily Telegraph, the NATO official outlined that the UK, which has enjoyed a position of influence within the US-led military bloc since its establishment after WWII, is now “in danger of not holding on” to it.
“I think we [the British military] are too small,” Radford said. He went on to describe the UK’s position within NATO as “fortunate,” but added: “I worry that if we don’t invest and we don’t build up our industrial base and we don’t lead as we should, we might lose that position.”
One of Radford’s major grievances is the declining numbers in the UK army, which is set to decrease to 73,000, according to plans announced as early as 2021. He also warned that the advanced technologies which London is heavily betting on are not capable of fully replacing military personnel.
“I think we’ve had a slight awakening after Ukraine, but we need to do a twin track approach,” Radford noted. While recognizing the importance of innovation in the military, he pointed out that this potential should “be underpinned with hard fighting power.”
“If someone comes toward you with a tank, you can’t cyber it away. You can’t cross a bridge with cyber. It needs to be balanced,” he said.
Radford’s remarks come after UK Defence Secretary Ben Wallace stated in January that the nation’s military is “hollowed out and underfunded.” That same month, Sky News reported that an unnamed senior US general privately told Wallace that the British military was no longer considered a top-level fighting force due to decades of defense cuts.
Despite this apparent criticism, in May, the Times reported that Wallace still planned to press forward with plans to cut the army’s size, intending to reduce the number of infantry in favor of artillery.
At the same time, the UK emerged as one of the most active supporters of Ukraine in its conflict with Russia, pledging £4.6 billion ($5.9 billion) in military assistance. It was also the first country to offer modern battle tanks to Kiev, later pledging to provide it with depleted-uranium shells, leaving Moscow furious.
Last edited:
There is nothing to argue here. It is true. They usually have 3 ships deployable. So 3 ships as surface-based air defense
What the fuck is Prigozhin doing honestly, he had not built up enough popularity and reputation for himself for people to rally to his side, and to do this during an Ukrainian offensive just confirms his status as a blatant traitor to the public.
I expect him to be annihilated quickly and whatever good he did wiped out. Amateurish and pure hubris.
I expect him to be annihilated quickly and whatever good he did wiped out. Amateurish and pure hubris.
I happen to like James Corden especially the shows he came up with when he hosted his own show in America.