Jura The idiot
General
What kind?
...
I'd recommend the Otomat "family" (with the capability to attack ships/submarines/land)
What kind?
...
Well it is a typical case of "Would'a...should'a...could'a."... in my opinion the Type 45 should have been armed with the new AShM since they entered service, instead of that FFBNW ...
Well it is a typical case of "Would'a...should'a...could'a."
The fact is that now they have these missiles and they are MUCH better than nothing. Besides, the Harpoon to this day, particularly with its later updates, is an excellent ASuM.
Also, the Royal Navy has pretty much admitted that it is really just a stop-gap measure.
Ultimately they will have newer missiles.
My guess is that either the LRASM from the US Navy, or one of the other newer missiles will be used when the Harpoons are retired (Like the Kongsberg Naval Strike Missile...or the Italian missiles).
UK strengthens its military position in Falklands
(Defensa.com) London announced it will increase its security measures in the Falkland Islands in the South Atlantic, believing that there is a lively part of Argentina, you could try re-invade threat. Secretary of State for Defence, Michael Fallon said in Parliament that the islands will see increased security, among others by sending two Chinook transport helicopters and improved system air missiles. In addition, the government will spend about 180 million pounds ($ 270 million) to improve the main port of the island until 2017, as well as other defenses in the next decade, said Fallon. London spends every year millions of pounds in the security and maintenance of the islands, so the British presence there is disputed between racks even in the European country........
[/URL]
By on Thursday, March 26th, 2015
Argentina branded Britain’s plans to beef up its defenses in the Falkland Islands a “provocation” and a pre-election stunt Wednesday.
On Tuesday, British Defense Secretary Michael Fallon said London would spend £180 million ($268 million) over 10 years to counter “continuous intimidation” from Argentina in the disputed South Atlantic islands, which the two countries went to war over in 1982.
“This business from Great Britain is a provocation, not just to Argentina but also to the United Nations,” said Argentine Foreign Minister Hector Timerman.
The UN’s Decolonization Committee adopted a resolution last year calling on Britain to negotiate with Argentina on the islands’ status, as Buenos Aires has long demanded.
Britain argues the islanders should decide themselves which country they want to belong to. In a 2013 referendum, 99.8 percent voted to remain a British overseas territory.
Timerman said the British defense initiative “makes no sense.”
“We are committed to dialogue and international law,” he told local broadcaster Radio del Plata, saying Argentina would file a formal complaint with the UN and the Decolonization Committee.
President Cristina Kirchner’s cabinet chief, Anibal Fernandez, said the defense plan was less about Argentine threats than the campaign for Britain’s general elections on May 7.
“They’re facing elections so they resort to cheap nationalism to put all of British society on tenterhooks over a military matter,” he told a press conference.
Argentina invaded the Falklands, which it calls the Malvinas, in April 1982, sparking a bloody war that it lost in just over two months.
The conflict claimed the lives of 649 Argentine soldiers, 255 British soldiers and three islanders.
Argentina’s secretary for the Malvinas, Daniel Filmus, said it is “absolutely not the case” that Buenos Aires plans to repeat the invasion, launched under its military dictatorship.
“Since 1983, Argentina has again lived under a democracy and forcefully insists that there is only one path to regain sovereignty, the path of peace, diplomacy and negotiation,” he said.
Filmus said Britain’s real aim appeared to be “supporting the offshore oil rigs that are illegally pumping Argentine hydrocarbons” in the South Atlantic.
Argentina does not recognize Britain’s right to drill for oil in the region, where significant offshore deposits have been discovered in recent years.
[/URL]
With in general a Type 23 or 45.UK air assets are "modest" at best in the islands
4 x Typhoons
1 x refuelling tanker
1 x cargo transport
With two helos
But the question is not how many air assets they have the question is how many SSN are in the area?
RN SSN is the ace up the sleeve
The Typhoons and these additional air defenses should handle about anything the Argentines could currently send against the Falklands by air...at least until more help arrived.UK air assets are "modest" at best in the islands
But the question is not how many air assets they have the question is how many SSN are in the area?
RN SSN is the ace up the sleeve
Well it is a typical case of "Would'a...should'a...could'a."
...
sure can be considered a pub talk (I think I indeed posted while in the pub ... but still I thought I should get back to this, and after I found time for "some additional research", I'd like to say this:in my opinion the Type 45 should have been armed with the new AShM since they entered service, instead of that FFBNW ...