how can China sent Mig-29 to Turky?
![]()
There is some speculation that the Hungarians are participating in this exercise as well.
how can China sent Mig-29 to Turky?
![]()
The USAF is probably going to sit down and compare notes with Turkey after this exercise, if it is true.
Ok guys I need assistance dispelling a vicious rumor about the military exercise. Here are the latest updates:
1) No F-16s were used by the Turkish side. F-4s were used instead.
2) Turkey promised the U.S. that no sensitive NATO information would be leaked as a result of the exercise.
Now here is the "fun" part. There is a rumor running on the Chinese BBS that the Turkish side was able to achieve 8-0 kill ratio against Chinese flankers, with F-4s!!! This is extraordinary to say the least. Could anyone find reliable sources of info either proving or disproving this? Thnx.
I'm not too sure whether F-4s were used or F-16s, I think I read somewhere that they did use F-4s as not to violate too much american trust but can't remember where exactly.
LOL, don't worry guys this is only a PLAAF strategy so the USAF could underestimate them in combat and take them with surprise!
I think the fact that we're even considering this a possibility shows how much faith we have in PLAAF pilots :roll:
Sure the rumour isn't giving the numbers the other way round?
Honestly I wouldn't be surprise if those data are indeed correct. PLAAF may have a qualitative edge (in terms of hardware) in this particular case BUT keep in mind that they are relatively infantile when it comes to modern air combat from a standpoint or warfighting abilities, organization, experience and doctrines.
NATO countries such as Turkey has the benefit of knowledge, experience and skills through regular military exercises and exchange programs with other NATO forces because of membership while China do not. NATO pilots/Air Force also has certain requirements that are regularly cultivated and expanded to hone their skills in combat. I seriously doubt PLAAF has anything similar in terms of scope or effectiveness.
Something like ENJJPT and dozens of other similar type trainings are good examples.
If the Turks were flying something more modern, like F-16s then I'd concede a kill ratio favouring them, but even then an 8:0 kill ratio is... very questionable.Honestly I wouldn't be surprise if those data are indeed correct. PLAAF may have a qualitative edge (in terms of hardware) in this particular case BUT keep in mind that they are relatively infantile when it comes to modern air combat from a standpoint or warfighting abilities, organization, experience and doctrines.
NATO countries such as Turkey has the benefit of knowledge, experience and skills through regular military exercises and exchange programs with other NATO forces because of membership while China do not. NATO pilots/Air Force also has certain requirements that are regularly cultivated and expanded to hone their skills in combat. I seriously doubt PLAAF has anything similar in terms of scope or effectiveness.
Something like ENJJPT and dozens of other similar type trainings are good examples.
If the Turks were flying something more modern, like F-16s then I'd concede a kill ratio favouring them, but even then an 8:0 kill ratio is... very questionable.
We obviously don't know how well PLAAF pilots are trained, but they have their own red flag type exercises and I'm pretty sure they would have some competent doctrines worked out. Perhaps nothing as comperhensive as western equivalents of course, but flanker pilots should have some basic requirements.
8:0 with F-4s vs Flankers... something just doesn't add up.