U.S. Navy New ASM Development

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: U.S. Navy MMT, LRASM and ArcLight Anti-Shipping Missile Development

I am quite surprised, as all english articles on XASM 3 say it's high supersonic. But I suppose the boundaries between supersonic and hypersonic becomes blurred at about mach 5.
 

thunderchief

Senior Member
Re: U.S. Navy MMT, LRASM and ArcLight Anti-Shipping Missile Development

I doubt Japan could create ASM with 5 Mach capability . They lack experience even with subsonic sea-skimmers and import Harpoons from US .
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: U.S. Navy MMT, LRASM and ArcLight Anti-Shipping Missile Development

I doubt Japan could create ASM with 5 Mach capability . They lack experience even with subsonic sea-skimmers and import Harpoons from US .
Actually, you underestimate the Japanese, and are just wrong and completely out of date on the Japanese use of the Harpoon.

They used to import the Harpoon, but for some years now thay have been replacing all of their imported Harpoons with their own indegenously developed Mitsubishi Type 90 SSM-1B, which first went into service in 1990, 23 years ago, and they have been improving it ever since..

The Technical research and Development Institute of Japan which is attached to their Ministry of defense is actually a very sophisticated and advanced group that has been developing Japanese weapons systems for a long time.

Now, as regards the ASM-3 missile, they were first seen in 2006 when Japan's F-2 aircraft were photographed carrying XASM-3 test/prototype missiles. That's seven years ago.

Since that time a LOT of progress has been made, and I have no doubt that they will be in production within a few years now.

A decent article about the AMS-3 can be found here from 2012:


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


This is from the 21c site, which is a decent site that discusses Japanese Technical Research Institute Projects.
 
Last edited:

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Re: U.S. Navy MMT, LRASM and ArcLight Anti-Shipping Missile Development

I doubt Japan could create ASM with 5 Mach capability . They lack experience even with subsonic sea-skimmers and import Harpoons from US .

This post reminds me of a statement made by a high ranking Australian military official who is in charge of development of the next generation of subs to replace the Collins class, "We know more about Russian subs then Japanese subs." Showing the lack of knowledge of Japanese military equipment.

As Jeff-san had posted Japan had replaced all Harpoons with the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
missile family which came on line in 1980 replacing the air launched harpoons.
There are three variants the air to ship missile type 80 ASM-1, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
surface to ship missile which came on line in 1988 and the type 90 SSM-1B which is a ship launch variant which came on line in 1990.

They basically share the same specification.

  • Weight 660kg
  • Length 5m
  • Diameter 0.35m
  • Warhead 270kg
  • Engine solid propellant and Turbojet engine
  • Operational range 150-200km
  • Flight altitude 5-6m
  • Speed 1150km/h
  • Guidance system Inertial and active radar

TRDI is also developing an advanced version of SSM-1B which is scheduled to go on line in FY2017 which will have longer range and better guidance accuracy by adding ability to update target data during flight.
 
Last edited:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: U.S. Navy MMT, LRASM and ArcLight Anti-Shipping Missile Development

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



GBU-10-boat.jpg

GBU-10-21-685x488.jpg

B-1B Lancer delivers GBU-10 on target against small boats

The Aviationist said:
In September, the 337th Test and Evaluation Squadron sent a solo B-1B over the Gulf of Mexico and its sea ranges to prove the concept that Lancers (or “Bones” as the swing wing bombers are dubbed) can be used to attack surface targets whilst at sea; in other words, the goal of the mission was to assess and improve the B-1′s capabilities.

According to the Dyess AFB website the B-1 released six munitions, including a 500lb GBU-54 laser guided bomb as well as 500lb and 2000lb joint direct attack munitions (JDAM).

Lt. Col. Alejandro Gomez, 337th TES special projects officer said: “This evaluation solidifies what our crew members have already known: We can strike surface targets. The knowledge we gain from these events gives combatant commanders assurance that we can be called upon to complete the mission.”

The mission, called a “a maritime tactics development and evaluation” or TD&E ,saw the B-1 being given the goal of detect, target and engage small boats using currently fielded and available weapons, released in all weather conditions.

The dramatic photo in this post was taken during the mission and shows that the B-1 was very effective in doing its goals: the term “using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut” springs to mind as the GBU-10 is captured a split second before annihilating a small rigid hulled boat.

The Bone would give a group of Pirates a very bad day!

Not to mention a bunch of Iranian speed boats.

Just the same, and beyond speed bpats, this is a critical development. B-1B Lancers as Maritime Strike aircraft? Makes a lot of sense. Like a US Tu-26 Backfire that can be deployed by the dozens. If they can hit small craft like that with GBU type weapons, imagine what a group of B-1B Lancers could do loaded to the gills with JDAMs, SLAMs, Harpoons, and the new LRASM which is already testing with B-1B Lancers.


B-1B-Drops-LRASM-550x412.jpg

 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: U.S. Navy MMT, LRASM and ArcLight Anti-Shipping Missile Development

SD's own Navyreco interview with Lockheed Martin on the LRASM next generation anti-ship missile:


[video=youtube;etb_Vzl-9Dk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etb_Vzl-9Dk[/video]

From interview said:
The U.S. Air Force already conducted several tests with the LRASM onboard B-1 bombers. Ultimately a B-1B could carry up to 24 LRASM as it is currently capable of carrying 24 JASSM-ER. This would make the B-1B the most potent ASUW platform in the U.S. Air Force. As far as the U.S. Navy is concerned, the Super Hornet will be the main airborne platform to deploy the next generation anti-ship missile. We were told during AUSA that F-35 Lightning II could certainly deploy the missile, but would not be able to carry it internally because of the size of the LRASM.

Tests have begun to launch the LRASM from Mk41 Vertical Launch System cells. This type of VLS is widely used across the U.S. Navy fleet of destroyers and cruisers.

LRASM comes with a revolutionary sensor made by BAE Systems. The sensor is designed for situations where access to the airspace is made difficult for Allied Forces by the enemy. The sensor uses advanced electronic technologies to detect targets within a complex signal environment, and then calculates precise target locations for the missile control unit.

LRASM live launch testing from VLS is scheduled for mid-year 2014. LRASM air-launched testing will continue next year with flights from the B-1B. F/A-18 Super Hornet integration and testing will be part of a future contract.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

navyreco

Senior Member
Re: U.S. Navy MMT, LRASM and ArcLight Anti-Shipping Missile Development

Thanks Jeff, I didn't know about that thread.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: U.S. Navy MMT, LRASM and ArcLight Anti-Shipping Missile Development

Thanks Jeff, I didn't know about that thread.
I was going to post a pointer to you in the US Military News thread...but you beat me to it. It deserves to be in both places. It is important news overall, and the details should also be documented here.

Great interview...I'm jealous, hehehe. LOL!
 
Last edited:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: U.S. Navy MMT, LRASM and ArcLight Anti-Shipping Missile Development

I am reposting this from the US Military NEws thread where NAVYRECO posted it:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



e1slkc4.jpg


Navy Recognition said:
Lockheed Martin’s Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) recently achieved another successful flight test, with the missile scoring a direct hit on a moving maritime target. The test was conducted in support of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and Office of Naval Research (ONR) program.

Flying over the Sea Range at Point Mugu, Calif., a U.S. Air Force B-1B bomber from the 337th Test and Evaluation Squadron at Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, released the LRASM, which navigated through all planned waypoints receiving in-flight targeting updates from the Weapon Data Link. After transitioning to autonomous guidance, LRASM identified the target using inputs from the onboard sensors. The missile then descended for final approach, verified and impacted the target.

“This test, combined with the success of the first flight test in August, further demonstrates the capabilities and maturity of LRASM,” said Mike Fleming, LRASM air launch program manager at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control. “The new sensors and legacy JASSM-ER components all performed well during the flight and the missile impacted the target as planned.”
 
Top