Type 081 LHD

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sczepan

Senior Member
VIP Professional
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Type 081 LHD

Chinese sources at IMDEX confirmed that China is developing a new amphibious assault ship, a Landing Helicopter Dock, or “LHD.” However, when such ships may be built is not known. This ship had previously been identified as the Type 081, described by Asian sources as displacing about 20,000 tons. While Chinese officials as IMDEX would not disclose details about the Type 081, they did note that “we have the capability right now to build that ship.” There is no information that China is now building the Type 081, though a report in Force magazine has noted that China intends to build six of the 20,000 ton Type 071 LPD—the first of which was launched in December 2006—and then three of the Type 081 LHD. Asian sources speculate that the PLA will build two to as many as eight Type 071s. The Type 071 is designed to carry a reinforced battalion of troops, or about 500 to 800 troops and 50 or so vehicles. While the Type 071 is intended to carry four to six Z-9 size helicopters, the flat-deck Type 081 will carry more. It is likely that the Type 081 may carry 500 or so troops plus equipment but may devote more space to helicopter hanger deck. The PLA is known to have been seeking foreign LHD design data since the late 1990s though little is known of the ultimate configuration intended for the Type 081.

Asian sources estimate that China’s eventual intention is to build up a force that approximates a U.S. Marine Expeditionary Force. The Marine MEF also included air and logistics units, which may follow if the PLAN builds carrier air groups. Asian sources note that work is progressing on the refurbishment of the Ex-Russian/Ukrainian carrier Varyag, with recent attention being paid to its aircraft arresting wire system. These sources note the Varyag may be completed by 2012. If production estimates prove correct, then it may be China’s ambition to build an amphibious projection force of three battalions, each consisting of one Type 081 LHD and two Type 071 LPDs. The Type 081 would add the flexibility of being able to employ a larger number of helicopters for transport and attack missions to support an amphibious assault. Such a ship might also be embarked with anti-submarine warfare (ASW) helicopters to assist fleet escort.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
So...6-8 Type 071s, followed by three full deck Type 081s.

I guess the proof will be when we start seeing more Type 071s built...which we have yet to see, but which I do expect.

It will be interesting to see artists concepts of this Type 081 once it has been finalized and starts building. Something along the lines of an Ocean, or Dokdo?

Anyway, one large flat deck Type 081, accompanied by three Type 071s, and perhaps four or more Type 072 IIs or IIS, and protected by numerous modern PLAN DDGs and FFGs would be a fromidable amphibuious assault force.
 

Sczepan

Senior Member
VIP Professional
for a full deck type 081 LHS I would believe in a Melbourn derivate
its a proofed design, in combination with modern equipment, engines ... could become a nice amphibious carrier
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Thanks for posting that article Sczepan. I certianly do hope for the sake of the PLAN fans that this article has some validity to it. We've all been through over the last few years the drill of the difftrent articles about the PLAN CV programme.

Personally if this is true I would like to see the drawings & final specfications of the design.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
there has actually been quite a bit of discussion on chinese bbs regarding to attack helo carrier. It's been given the name Type 70 actually. The problem I had then and still now is the lack of naval helicopters in PLAN. It's fine and nice that you build something like this, but what are you going to put on it? Maybe the 40 ka-29 that was in negotiation? I don't know, but I don't see domestic options any time soon unless they decide to start producing naval Z-8s again.
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Tough Melbroune a.k.a the Brithish Colossus/Majestetic class could be described as "proofed design" it really isen't applying to this case. Those ships are WWII era light fleet carriers and it that role quite good actually. But when the operational enviroment is about 70 years further in the future with little bit different requirement for just about anything fitted onboard time is really passing for the design.

But actually the complete acient design concept isen't the key issue in here. LHD's tough looking much like a carriers are essentially landingship docks from the main shipdesign concepts. And thats something which Collosus/Majestetic class isen't. Landingship docks are build around the docking well fitted to the rear of the ships and it dictates all the interional solutions in the ship from keel to the highest mast and from the stern to the bow. When you start designing landing ship docks, you hardly have any use for old WWII era aircraft carriers as they don't benefit you at all. Perhaps for the outer hull style and overall size but thats hardly an effort to do even without one.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
What golly says is very true. I'm thinking that perhaps the writer of this article meant to write LPH instead of LHD.

Why would the Chinese build and LHD when they will eventually have three LPD's? This is a reason why the USN will build only LHA's now with no well deck...Basically a ship that will assist an amphipous landing with air assault with helos laden with marines, assault helos and VTOL aircraft...In the PLAN case they presently have neither.
 

dollarman

New Member
there has actually been quite a bit of discussion on chinese bbs regarding to attack helo carrier. It's been given the name Type 70 actually. The problem I had then and still now is the lack of naval helicopters in PLAN. It's fine and nice that you build something like this, but what are you going to put on it? Maybe the 40 ka-29 that was in negotiation? I don't know, but I don't see domestic options any time soon unless they decide to start producing naval Z-8s again.

I think you hit the money on that one, because another strategycenter article published in January listed the exact same two options you mention. Z-10 was also brought up, so maybe it's not exclusively for the army?

Does anyone have any ideas on the hovercraft design that might agument the type 71?
 

Sczepan

Senior Member
VIP Professional
Golli, I'd like to protest. The PLAN don't need LPDs, they need amphibious carriers to protect the landing fleet and the beaching ground.
So I'd like to add attack helos and light wight attack role fighters - also to be used for training - like the L-15 Falcon in priority;
for that the ship need a small catapulte (like the ole Melbourne has, that would be big enough).
When they could pick up some transport helos to, it's not harmful - but it would be suicide to miss the airshield - and for that you really could miss the dock.
 
Last edited:

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Thats just waste of recources. Basicly you have two enourmous ships doing the task which could be given to single hull (or more ideally several hulls doing all the tasks). US Tarawa class is essentially a huge landingship dock with that exact airsupport ability.

We have discusssed this several times earlier. Melbourne is so small that it cannot operate any other planes effectly other than VSTOL planes. LHD design can do the same in additional to have the troop transporting ability alongside. With the prizetag of several normal LSD and one or two solely airsupport "melbournes", you can have several LHDs with equal landing ability as in the previous alternative but with greatly expanded airsupport ability in the event of more decks availble.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top