Yea, no lol, that's why I said this ship makes no sense. You cannot land like that w/o clearing the frekin deck which makes it extremely inefficient for combat operations and very very low sorties which is antithetical to what a carrier does.
The only thing I can postulate is launching fixed wing is an extremely secondary mission profile for this ship OR we got it wrong and it may still very well have an angle deck.
Or if it's only designed for fixed wing UCAVs they don't expect recovery in times of war... it'll either be lost due to enemy fire or deliberately crashed into the sea.
It doesn’t make sense as a light carrier because it’s not designed to be a light carrier.
I think that for carriers, there is a minimum displacement threshold that you need achieve to be able to do proper carrier missions, at least with conventional jets. You can get away with smaller with STVLO, but that comes at a significant cost in terms of performance of both the carriers and their jets.
I think this is an area where we will see a weird convergence between the PLAN and the USN, but for entirely different reasons. The USN operates LHAs cosplaying as light carriers because of the bureaucratic in-fighting between the USN and Marines where the USN will not allow the Marines to have proper light carriers as it doesn’t want to let go of that monopoly, and also sees light carriers as a major threat to its super carrier fleet in case penny pinching politicians tell them to make do with light carriers instead of getting funding for more supercarriers, so the marines had to make the best of what the USN would allow them to get away with.
The PLAN doesn’t want light carriers, as it will just pump out more supercarriers if it wants more carriers.
What China needs, which the PLAN has to provide, is a new global reach to protect growing Chinese international interests.
Rather than follow the American approach of having a vast sprawling network of global bases, I see the 076 as China’s solution - mobile all-in-one foreign bases. China’s actual foreign military bases will be mostly limited to logistical support of its fleets abroad. It’s the 076 that will do any actual military action.
If you think of the 076 as a mobile foreign military base, its design makes perfect sense as how many sortie rates do you need for drone ops? Being able to keep one recon drone on station 24/7 with a few more strike drones on standby would be more than enough for most missions. It will also have transport and attack helicopters for supporting SpecOps missions, and maybe 4 J35s for task force CAP and supplementary ground attack. It will also have a couple of LCACs, tanks and armour and a few hundred PLA Marines.
Such a force would be able to deal with 90-95% of realistically possible overseas combat operations, what’s left are missions you need a full blooded carrier strike group for anyways.
Having 076s instead of foreign military bases would not be remotely as resource intensive as American style global basing; it also means China will never be forced to use military force to prop up a failing regime like the Americans are habitually forced to do to keep their foreign bases and the Russians had to do in Syria. It also means China will not be at risk of loosing bases or getting into highly embarrassing situations like the Americans and French of having to evacuate its bases or risk having its foreign garrison turning into effective hostages following a change of government or even a change of mind by a foreign government. Which, let’s be frank, it’s a bigger risk for China since the 5 Eyes intelligence agencies specialise in fermenting unrest and regime change globally.