Trump is so good at diplomacy that he single handedly brought 2 world‘s largest (by population) together. Truly a nobel piece price winning accomplishment.Whats diplomacy for?
Trump is so good at diplomacy that he single handedly brought 2 world‘s largest (by population) together. Truly a nobel piece price winning accomplishment.Whats diplomacy for?
Yeah, people here forget that USSR at one point was seriously considering nuking China. The problems between India and China are peanuts in comparision. India also has no serious business in interfering in Taiwan issue as that region doesn‘t belong to India‘s core interests. I would even say, India doesn‘t any sensitive geopolitical problems. Even the problem with Pakistan can be solved by letting India be. India and China are maturally suited for being allies. It‘s just some artificial problems kept the two st odds with each other for some reason.Agree to most of your points. Except that, India and China can actually be good partners just like China and Russia who had even more troubling border dispute before. As far as China and India can come to an agreement on their border dispute then things will naturally settle with time and trust and cooperation will be rebuilt with time. The biggest stumbling block to their border dispute is the border dispute. Without that relations will actually be quite good between China and India.
They were not just considering nuking China, they actually threatened to do just that. Funny enough it was ironically US dissuasion which made them reconsider things. Additiinally you forget that the China/Russia border was one of the/if not the most militarized on earth at the time(some claim almost 2.5million troops at some point) and both countries even fought a war/clashed over the border as well. Some people tend to forget the level of enmity that existed between China and Russia(we humans forget very quicky. Lol ) not just over the border issue but even more so ideologically. So it was a deep enmity(Russia was China's number 1 enemy and threat then by far) unlike the superficial one between India and China which is just a legacy of british colonial rule and bad demarcation of the border which lingers to the modern era, compared this to the Chinese- Soviet Russia issue which stemed from something even deeper for China back then since it was the result of the unequal treaties imposed by Russia who took advantage(like they are did recently with Georgia, Crimea and now Ukraine and even in the past with Japan at the end of the war over sakhalin island when japan was basically already defeated by the US) of a weak china and seized and carved out vast territories from China(the land they carved out/seized is almost the size of western europe). So Chinese leaders would have found it hard to allow the border issue to be won and taken by soviet Russia again. So the enmity and differences was much more deeper, yet they still settled it peacefully eventually albeit it was also due to the US/West weakening Soviet Russia and leading to the fall and bankruptcy of their empire , so they had to negotiate with China and agree to some concessions with China eventually. They never would have done so if the soviet union didnt lose their competition with the US. So ironically, China was one of the biggest winner of Soviet collapse. LolYeah, people here forget that USSR at one point was seriously considering nuking China. The problems between India and China are peanuts in comparision. India also has no serious business in interfering in Taiwan issue as that region doesn‘t belong to India‘s core interests. I would even say, India doesn‘t any sensitive geopolitical problems. Even the problem with Pakistan can be solved by letting India be. India and China are maturally suited for being allies. It‘s just some artificial problems kept the two st odds with each other for some reason.
The problem is that only one of these two parties wants to settle the border through negotiation, and only one of the two cares about looking like a mature power. It'd be very easy for China to give up claims to Arundachal Pradesh, but I don't think that India can do so for Aksai Chin. I suspect that they won't even start up formal discussions over the subject.So i believe China and India should and wohld eventually find an agreement on the border dispute. Its in both intersts to do so to be honest. I know pride makes it harder but they should act like big matured powers and come to an agreement(maybe juat recognise the land each hold at the moment as each other territory and then agree to demarcate all the border while making some concessioms on each side). They cant keep the dispute status quo forever, plus its mostly just some mountain of barren rocks anyway. Lol
Japan’s top trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, abruptly canceled his trip to Washington on Thursday because there remains a gap between the two sides on the issue of rice,
Japanese officials are unhappy that a U.S. presidential order would include plans for Japan to increase purchases of American rice and a reduction of tariffs on agricultural products, the report said Friday. Japan objects to the order that would be sent to U.S. government agencies as some points have not been resolved, Nikkei said, citing unidentified Japanese officials.
The daimyo changes the retainer's rice stipend; the retainer endures what he mustRice imports are apparently the sticking point between US-Japan. Trump keeps changing the deal.
The Japanese farming lobby is quite strong. And Japan considers self-reliance in rice production as a strategic necessity. Trump is dumb both with this and trying to get India to import US food.Rice imports are apparently the sticking point between US-Japan. Trump keeps changing the deal.
I'm now really getting worried about Trumps health
I hope nothing happens to him. We still need Comrade Trump to lead the downfall of American imperialism
Would be interesting to see what happens when everyone sues to claw back the unlawful tariffs paid.
CANTOR FITZGERALD, A financial services company led by the sons of US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick say they have the capacity to buy the rights to hundreds of millions of dollars in potential refunds from companies who have paid Trump’s tariffs.
Cantor said the firm was willing to trade tariff refund rights for 20 to 30 percent of what companies have paid in duties. “So for a company that paid $10 million, they could expect to receive $2-$3 million in a trade,” the representative wrote.
Lutnick ran Cantor Fitzgerald for nearly 30 years until he was confirmed by the Senate in February, when he turned over control of the firm to his sons, Kyle and Brandon