Trump 2.0 official thread

RoastGooseHKer

Junior Member
Registered Member
Eventual incorporation as part of China should be the ultimate goal, as with Mongolia, 'Manchuria', Xizang
Why Japan? It is bunch of crowded islands with absolutely no natural resources. It is also the reason why Japan always wanted to invade continental Asia. However, it is exactly because Japan lacks resources that compels the Japanese nation to adopt an offensively realistic but very opportunistic maritime imperialist foreign policy. Tokyo also realises that it is not a top-notch power, so it has long tried to align with the strongest power in the world order (British Empire from Meiji era to right before WWII, and then the US after WWII) in order conquer other lesser powers (Korea, Qing, ROC, Russia, USSR, etc.). Japanese elites also realises that striking Pearl Harbour was a strategic mistake, but not invading the much weaker China.

In general, Japan is highly opportunistic and has long mastered realpolitik as a regional power.

Internally, Japanese ideology is actually extremely feudalistic to its core due to the population's continuing perception of the emperor and respect for paternalistic social order as the ultimate guarantor of the national identity/existence.

As with today and exemplified by the US-Japan alliance, they most effective way to keep Japan down is to preserve its independence (especially keeping its emperor) but coerce Japan through both institutional and power means to give up part of its sovereign defence and foreign policy.
 

Xiongmao

Junior Member
Registered Member
Why Japan? It is bunch of crowded islands with absolutely no natural resources. It is also the reason why Japan always wanted to invade continental Asia. However, it is exactly because Japan lacks resources that compels the Japanese nation to adopt an offensively realistic but very opportunistic maritime imperialist foreign policy. Tokyo also realises that it is not a top-notch power, so it has long tried to align with the strongest power in the world order (British Empire from Meiji era to right before WWII, and then the US after WWII) in order conquer other lesser powers (Korea, Qing, ROC, Russia, USSR, etc.). Japanese elites also realises that striking Pearl Harbour was a strategic mistake, but not invading the much weaker China.

In general, Japan is highly opportunistic and has long mastered realpolitik as a regional power.

Internally, Japanese ideology is actually extremely feudalistic to its core due to the population's continuing perception of the emperor and respect for paternalistic social order as the ultimate guarantor of the national identity/existence.

As with today and exemplified by the US-Japan alliance, they most effective way to keep Japan down is to preserve its independence (especially keeping its emperor) but coerce Japan through both institutional and power means to give up part of its sovereign defence and foreign policy.
I think he means Japan as a tributary state to China like the old times, where tributary states recognised the authority of the Chinese government and paid tributes in return for economic and diplomatic favours.
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Going full retard. I think the US export much more movies than it imports.

View attachment 151164
I think he meant movies shot outside of the US. A lot of Hollywood movies were shot in Toronto and Vancouver for example. The Incredible Hulk was shot in Toronto. I recognized U of T and Yonge St in the final fight scene when I watched it in the theatre.
 

Thecore

New Member
Registered Member
Going full retard. I think the US export much more movies than it imports.

View attachment 151164
He should do video games next and do a 100% tariff on any game that is foreign developed. The new mario kart game alone will be almost $200. Truth be told it would be in the strategic interest of China for Japanese cultural influence on American youth to be diminished. Let them return to the strange opaque foreigners that can't be trusted type of reputation that they once had.
 
Top