It's not actually a good thing, even for America. As far as imperial expansions go you want to grab highly developed areas of the world that can contribute to your empire's internal economics. So we're talking Japan, South Korea, Western Europe. If instead you grab poorly developed areas like Eastern Europe or Latin America it weakens the empire since you're either:So this is what happens when you elect a US president who is willing to use American hard power to the full extent. US is effortlessly getting whatever the hell it wants and there's nothing the rest of the world can do about it.
1. Don't do much with those areas, so no investment to better them nor extracting much value, so its just costing you militarily to hold onto them
2. Invest into those area, costing you resources today in hope for future pay off, something that US used to be good at but is no longer the case. Soviet Union did this with Eastern Europe and some of its socialist republics
With 38 trillion in the hole US needs to extract value today, not decades down the line. Grabbing Venezuela or Greenland doesn't help here, particularly if you factor in the political cost. Trump is doing his own version of , it didn't work out so well when Brezhnev tried it.
