Basically admitting the sanction failed to stop Russia from selling oil to Western countries through intermediaries. And actual drop in Russian oil production will affect Western economies during election year.
The war is currently in attrition phase. Major gains are not expected until one of the sides has been significantly degraded.Kherson and Kharkiv. That was the last time both armies made worthwhile captures of territories. Before that was Ukraine's assault and victory of its north and northeast region of the country. That's about it when it comes to "worthwhile."
Russians haven't captured "worthwhile" territory since the first few weeks of the war. Bakhmut and Avdiivka cost the Russians heavily over a divisions worth of men and armored vehicles combined and really haven't captured much. Vuhledar was another disaster that has cost them a divisions worth of men and armored vehicles and they haven't captured that.
You are asking the wrong question... your question should be has Russia, a supposedly "superpower" especially on land and compared to Ukraine, captured any territory that's worthwhile since they lost 50% of territory they captured in the beginning of the war.
How many kilometers has Russia advance west since taking Bakhmut? I can tell you not very much and it cost them almost a divisions worth of men and equipment. Avdiivka was almost a 6-month campaign and this battle cost the Russians a divisions worth of men and armored vehicles and have been stopped 2 kms west of the city center. These two cities/towns were the frontline towns it's not like the Russians started from a far to take these two and it cost them a hell of a lot of men and armored vehicles. Same with Vuhledar only they haven't been able to take that town.A Kherson or Kharkiv scenario would actually be in Ukraine's best interest because it implies that the AFU was able to withdraw and retreat without having taken significant material or personnel losses.
The worst case for the AFU is continue to hold onto positions but take unsustainable losses like they are doing now, getting slowly grinded down though appearing not to lose significant ground.
Russians have suffered minimal losses during the battle of Avdeevka. Ukrainians are the ones who sustained catastrophic casualties due to Zelenskyy's insistence on keeping the city under all costs.How many kilometers has Russia advance west since taking Bakhmut? I can tell you not very much and it cost them almost a divisions worth of men and equipment. Avdiivka was almost a 6-month campaign and this battle cost the Russians a divisions worth of men and armored vehicles and have been stopped 2 kms west of the city center. These two cities/towns were the frontline towns it's not like the Russians started from a far to take these two and it cost them a hell of a lot of men and armored vehicles. Same with Vuhledar only they haven't been able to take that town.