The sinking of South Korean Corvette Cheonan

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Its a strange view on the video, especially with the ends covered in taups. If however that was the whole ship, it would have been little more than a Patrol Boat.

Any damage to the Stern would be from impact on the Sea Bed.
 

jantxv

New Member
Its a strange view on the video, especially with the ends covered in taups. If however that was the whole ship, it would have been little more than a Patrol Boat.

Any damage to the Stern would be from impact on the Sea Bed.

The video is showing only the stern section. 2/3 of the forward part of the ship is still under water. Look at the previous posts to see pics of the whole ship before it sank. Please click on thumbnail image on post number #16 to see entire ship.
 
Last edited:

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Yeah I see it now. Before if it was the bow and it was mostly caused by something external. Now that it's back to the middle of the ship, it still could be something internal.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Looks like the North Koreans don't want to be involved with this. I wonder why it took them so long to say that they weren't responsible:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Probe into stricken S.Korean warship
(AFP) – 5 hours ago

SEOUL — The stern of a South Korean warship that sank near the North Korean border leading to heightened North-South tensions was brought to a naval base south of Seoul on Sunday for further investigations.

On Saturday, North Korea denied involvement in the March 26 sinking of the Cheonan, a 1,200-tonne corvette, with its official news agency issuing a vitriolic statement against the South.

Forty-six sailors lost their lives in the sinking and officials in the South said Friday an external blast had been the cause.

Seoul has launched an international investigation involving eight Americans, three Australians and four Swedes to ensure the eventual findings cannot be disputed.

Navy officials said investigators were at the naval base in Pyeongtaek, 70 kilometres (43 miles) south of Seoul, looking into the stern which had been cleared of ammunition and was illuminated inside.

They were also scrutinising some 170 pieces of the debris for clues to the cause of the disaster.

While South Korea has not blamed the North for the sinking, Seoul's Foreign Minister Yu Myung-Hwan told KBS television on Sunday the UN Security Council could handle the case if Pyongyang is found to be involved.

Seoul's Defence Minister Kim Tae-Young has raised the possibility that a mine or torpedo may have hit the Cheonan, warning of "stern" actions against whoever is found to be responsible.

Chief investigator Yoon Duk-Yong said on Friday the steel plate of the warship's port side was curved inward, adding the warship seemed to have received a powerful impact on the port side.

He ruled out an onboard blast or a shipwreck.

Analysts said the incident would harm diplomatic efforts aimed at persuading North Korea back to six-party nuclear disarmament talks that the communist state quit a year ago.

The Yellow Sea border was the scene of deadly naval clashes between the North and South in 1999 and 2002 and of a firefight last November that left a North Korean patrol boat in flames.

On Saturday, the North's KCNA news agency said: "The war maniacs of the South's puppet military and right-wing conservative politicians are now making a foolish attempt to link the tragedy to us after having failed to find out the cause of the sinking.

"The reason that the South's puppets are claiming the North's involvement is also linked to their foolish efforts to put pressure on us, even by stirring up international opinion in favour of sanctions," KCNA said.
 

bigstick61

Junior Member
STRATFOR has this to say right now:

South Korea’s military believes a torpedo fired from a North Korean submarine sank its navy ship last month, based on intelligence gathered jointly with the United States, Reuters reported April 22. The military’s intelligence arm sent the report of “certain” North Korean involvement to the presidential Blue House soon after the incident, Yonhap quoted a high-ranking military source as saying. North Korean submarines are all armed with heavy torpedoes with 200 kg (441 lb) warheads, according to the military source. It is the military intelligence’s assessment that North Korea attacked with a heavy torpedo.

Kinda what I've been thinking all along. The evidence seemed to largely point in that direction from the beginning.
 

rhino123

Pencil Pusher
VIP Professional
Somehow I doubt that report. From historical facts... North Korea will admit to any attack on South Korea readily... plus there simply is nothing for the North Korea to sink a South Korea ship and later deny any involvement... I mean, why would they want to do it? What is there for the NK to gain? It just didn't main any sense.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
North Koreans don't corner the market on crazy and extreme in Asia. And the ones that are US allies aren't automatically innocent little children. Look at their histories and you'll see police states and dictatorships a generation ago. I wouldn't put it past someone in South Korea to exploit this situation to create an international incident. Wouldn't there be physical evidence of a torpedo or a mine even?
 

getready

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2010
N.Korea torpedoed warship

This file photo taken on April 15, 2010 shows a giant floating crane lifting the stern of the South Korean warship, the 1,200-tonne corvette Cheonan, to place it on a barge after it was split in two by a big external explosion on March 26 near a disputed Yellow Sea border with the loss of 46 lives. -- PHOTO: AFP

SEOUL - SOUTH Korea's military believes a torpedo fired from a North Korean submarine sank its navy ship last month, based on intelligence gathered jointly with the United States, a news report said on Thursday.

The Yonhap news agency report appears to be the clearest sign yet that Seoul blames Pyongyang for the sinking, thought to have killed 46 sailors in what would be one of the deadliest incidents between the rivals since the end of the 1950-53 Korean War.

The military's intelligence arm sent the report of'certain' North Korean involvement to the presidential Blue House soon after the incident, Yonhap quoted a high-ranking military source as saying. The report could be an embarrassment to South Korean President Lee Myung Bak, whose government has come under criticism for its handling of the incident.

'North Korean submarines are all armed with heavy torpedoes with 200kg warheads,' the military source was quoted as saying by Yonhap. 'It is the military intelligence's assessment that the North attacked with a heavy torpedo.

'The military intelligence has made the report to the Blue House and to the Defence Ministry immediately after the sinking of the Cheonan that it is clearly the work of North Korea's military,' the source was quoted as saying.

South Korea plans to soon raise the front half of the 1,200-tonne Cheonan, which went down near a disputed sea border with North Korea, and will issue its verdict on the cause of the explosion that sank the warship after that. Analysts said there is little South Korea can do even if Pyongyang is found to be the culprit, because a military response was likely to hurt its own quickly recovering economy and bolster North Korean leader Kim Jong Il's standing at home.
-- REUTERS
 
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
I wonder what South Korea and USA's response will be to this incident...

South Korea plans to soon raise the front half of the 1,200-tonne Cheonan, which went down near a disputed sea border with North Korea, and will issue its verdict on the cause of the explosion that sank the warship after that. Analysts said there is little South Korea can do even if Pyongyang is found to be the culprit, because a military response was likely to hurt its own quickly recovering economy and bolster North Korean leader Kim Jong Il's standing at home.

I don't think South Korea could handle the issue by itself. Perhaps it would ask for greater military assistance from the United States?

Take note that the South Korean gov. didn't issue an official response yet. We would need to just wait and see...
 
Top