Mentioning the F-16 is a very good tactic, with how hard the US is trying to court India and how fragile the Indian ego is right now. Imo it would have maybe even been better if he had directly said it was F-16 not J-10 that did the shooting
The Kashmir conflict 2025.
- Thread starter ohan_qwe
- Start date
That was the the great-great-great grandfather of AAMs. Pretty sure the fusing of things 70 years ago were less advanced.
That said, it is possible but just unlikely to be found in that condition -- even if it didn't blow up.
Maybe the pilot went to an open channel after losing contact with his squadron member in an effort to reestablish communications?
Also, in a saturated EW environment, analog VHF channels have a better chance of getting through (you still hear something against the static noise) than an encrypted digital signal.
Now both sides, whether official or civilian, have begun to actively or passively engage in cognitive warfare.
Clinging to the hope of victory is understandable. After all, you took your first loss the moment you were born in India.
I look forward to the details of the engagement becoming more and more public.
Aurangzeb still cooking Jai-Hinds 3 centuries later.
Isn't this what I predicted "attack civilians and use their moral standards to claim a small victory. A small victory is better than a big defeat, win"
Indian cognitive warfare strategy has been predicted by me, or rather, it has been used too many times by the Ukrainians & Israelis in the past, everybody knows what will happen.
And at least Israelis happen to have a very clear position in this incident, hmmmmmmm
JayBird
Junior Member
But... but what about the Super duper Rafael? How is Godzilla 4 doing?The amount of cope here is astonishing.... We build our own BVRAAM along with AESA seeker...we don't need to replicate yours mighty technology which Pakistan has transferred us being a good neighbor
any sale of weapon to another country would need to be authorized from CPC beijing. They would have considered the risk of leaking.
Nah, I get why they're saying this but I'm not buying it. PLA watchers like 洋务先驱张之洞 have said strongly that it is indeed PL-15
In fact I'm pretty sure 洋务先驱张之洞 is a China MIC insider