The Kashmir conflict 2025.

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
US news and world report. The one that makes the Uni rankings.

Here's the thing. Only that site mentioned it. No other side like New York times or Bloomberg confirmed it. Also say say intelligence official believe. What if those intelligence officials just asked Indian officials like TASS did?

That alone makes it suspicious. In this case if we get cnn, Reuters,.Bloomberg etc all confirming the same thing there's more credibility

No this was to Reuters. They are confident because F-16s were not used.
 

BasilicaLew

New Member
Registered Member
Both sides need to be scrutinized. But I think Indian media especially needs a double layer of checking.

Remember, trying to fool/scam people in war is a legit tactic.
India needs to be triple checked due to them shutting off the internet, while Pakistan has proven to be a very reasonable reporter. If Pakistan claims something you can be 90% sure they are telling the truth, they don't hide the injuries they had when India attacked an HQ battery.
 

againwithfeeling

Just Hatched
Registered Member
US news and world report. The one that makes the Uni rankings.

Here's the thing. Only that site mentioned it. No other side like New York times or Bloomberg confirmed it. Also say say intelligence official believe. What if those intelligence officials just asked Indian officials like TASS did?

That alone makes it suspicious. Right now in this case if we get cnn, Reuters,.Bloomberg etc all confirming the same thing there's more credibility
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Randomuser

Senior Member
Registered Member

phrozenflame

Junior Member
Registered Member
Not a single footage or image of destroyed Pakistani drones or missiles over J&K. Either India is fabricating or Pakistan/China prototype testing EW lol
There can be other reason: After failed 25 drones attack earlier, they need to build up on that to satisfy the internal public. Kashmir and Amritsar/Punjab are being chosen for the false flag because populations there have soft corner for Pakistan.
 

BasilicaLew

New Member
Registered Member
There can be other reason: After failed 25 drones attack earlier, they need to build up on that to satisfy the internal public. Kashmir and Amritsar/Punjab are being chosen for the false flag because populations there have soft corner for Pakistan.
To be fair, ONLY India has stated they have 1 way attack drones. Pakistan doesn't have any. Yet I also think about my suspect as well.
 

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
Right now in this case if we get cnn, Reuters,.Bloomberg etc all confirming the same thing there's more credibility
That would depend on the sources and references used. US media, and media in general, have a habit of referencing each other so just because they all report the same things doesn’t necessarily mean credibility.

2019 was a case in point, some US site reported referencing Indian news then Indian news use said US site as a source and confirmed their own BS literally.
 

BasilicaLew

New Member
Registered Member
CONFIRMED, from first-hand source.
Fake video - Indians really are masters of fake news...You can watch the original briefing here:

This video is BANNED in India. Yet, Pakistan hasn't banned any Indian channels. (Proves whose side you should believe.)

Also, India seems to be launching back at Pakistan. In India, at least AD battery have been confirmed to have be hit, as secondary explosions that are being called “Interceptions” are being seen as, obvious from the high height of these “interceptions” and the random spacing of them.
 

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
This should clear things up. Bigger chances of it being a Kebaps truck than a command post

Man imagine you are a food truck owner and wanted to paint it in camo because you are working in a military base.

Then the next morning you go to open up only to find it blown to hell and you see your truck on the internet, with everyone claiming it was a SAM control truck.

Not sure what to think about that.
 
Top