Mr T
Senior Member
They already have mobile launchers for the HF-II
How many, though? Also, do we know the quality of the mobile radar stations?
More importantly, is the HF-II really the equivalent of an RGM-84L-4? The HF-II went into production in the early 1990s, and I'm not sure how many times the missile has been upgraded. Whereas Block 2 was introduced only about a decade ago, so it wouldn't be surprising if it's a more advanced missile.
This is looking like a giant waste of money (use the money to buy SLARAAMs instead), not to mention a logistical hassle (the operational case for maximizing the number of AShM types is a lot weaker compared to SAM diversity).
I've seen people argue that more anti-ship missiles is the way to go because China can out-build Taiwan in terms of ballistic/cruise missiles, so it'll never have enough SAM batteries because you need to launch multiple interceptors to be sure of destroying the target. Whereas there's only so much the PLAN can do to protect its shipping.
I've seen SLAMRAAM mentioned in the past but I doubt it would be cheap. Taiwan has been producing Sky Bow 2 and 3 for some time now, and if they're going to be spamming SAMs it would be better to do the cheaper domestic ones.
Given that there are only 4 radars, those Harpoons are going to be pretty degraded (if not useless) if those radars get knocked out.
Where did you get four radars from? The DSCA notification says 25 radar trucks and makes no reference to separate radar units, which would imply it's 25 radars in total.