South China Sea Strategies for other nations (Not China)

Blackstone

Brigadier
Here is another source but no mention of anchored for 2 years:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Malaysia to protest over China Coast Guard 'intrusion': Navy chief
Navy Chief Abdul Aziz Jaafar said that since late 2014, intrusions by Chinese ships into Malaysian waters have been a daily affair with Kuala Lumpur protesting to Beijing each time.
So Malaysia has been dealing with China frequently since late 2014 over sovereignty issues, and "The Diplomat" publication (based in Japan) is just now hyping it? To what end? What's their agenda?
 

schenkus

Junior Member
Registered Member
So Malaysia has been dealing with China frequently since late 2014 over sovereignty issues, and "The Diplomat" publication (based in Japan) is just now hyping it? To what end? What's their agenda?

The way I understood the article Malaysia has been protesting "privately" to Beijing without involving the media but since China has not changed their behaviour Malaysia is now protesting more loudly.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
A critical view of recent US words and actions on SCS disputes, but also points out weaknesses in PRC's position too. The entire article is too long to post, but it's well worth the read. Some important points are:
The propaganda tactic being repeatedly used by those who see China as the only provocateur is to blur complex matters of law, dates and sequencing of events to paint China in the worst possible light. China is not blameless but the hysteria coming from the anti-China camp might be seen as laughable were it not so serious.
Got it in one.

The U.S. State Department position has consistently been relatively measured and restrained. It needs to reassert some control over PACOM’s public diplomacy.
I'd add Defense Secretary Ash Carter to the need-adult-supervision list too.

But this is not simply an institutional coordination problem in Washington. It is a serious intelligence failure on the part of the U.S. Navy leaders in the Pacific. They are expert in the Law of the Sea but they have far less expertise on the law of territorial acquisition and sovereignty. The Pentagon, and PACOM in particular, have appeared on too many occasions deeply inexpert or biased on China. In public and in private, PACOM officers too often rush to ascribe the most silly intentions to China without offering any sort of reasoned and empathetic assessment of how the Chinese might see the problem.
Couldn't have said it better myself.

A new and more empathetic study of the issue from the United States government might also evaluate the reliability of the repeated reassurances from Chinese leaders that their activities in defence of the Spratly claim represent no threat to international commercial shipping. The U.S. intelligence community is capable of such a balanced study. It may exist already. The world would be a safer place if it could see such a balanced study by the U.S. intelligence community in the public domain.
QED!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

joshuatree

Captain
If you google 'Luconia Shoals' news, there are a lot of them recently, so the rumors are pretty much confirmed. Regarding that 'anchored for 2 years', I think you are right, it is easier to swap the ships. Regarding SCS disputes, Malaysia tried to be on the good side of China so it probably tried to down play the Chinese Coast Guard ship(s) in the vicinity of Luconia Shoals until now the Chinese engineers started to conduct land survey on the Luconia Breakers.

Here is one from Borneo Post:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Photo shows the China Coast Guard vessel, which has been anchored in Gugusan Beting Patinggi Ali for about two years.

I don't see anything improbable about Chinese Coast Guard vessels sailing near Luconia Shoals, maybe even dropping anchor for a bit. I think you mentioned the shoal is entitled to its own 12 NM of territorial sea so is it invading Malaysian EEZ if the shoal is disputed?

But I do not consider a Borneo Post article as validation that a specific Chinese CG vessel has been anchored and at station for 2 years. Infact, CCG 1123 was Haijian 23. It can't be at two places at once. It's only June 2015 and the articles below indicate the vessel was near Diaoyu less than 2 years ago and on multiple occasions. All of this means there's a lot of sensational reporting being done by the media.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China continues to patrol waters surrounding Diaoyu Islands


English.news.cn 2013-07-01 11:10:20 RSS Feedback Print Copy URL More



BEIJING, July 1 (Xinhua) -- Chinese marine surveillance ships continued their regular patrols in waters surrounding the territorial Diaoyu Islands on Monday, the State Oceanic Administration (SOA) said.

A fleet consisting of four ships, the Haijian 51, Haijian 23, Haijian 49 and Haijian 5001, carried out the mission, according to the SOA.

During the patrol, the Chinese fleet spotted and monitored Japanese vessels that were illegally sailing in the area. They collected evidence on the Japanese ships and took law enforcement measures.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Chinese coast guard patrols Diaoyu Islands
(Xinhua) 13:52, October 28, 2013
Email|Print|Comments twitter facebook Sina Microblog reddit

BEIJING, Oct. 28 -- Four China Coast Guard (CCG) vessels patrolled territorial waterssurrounding the Diaoyu Islands on Monday, according to a State Oceanic Administration statement.

The CCG, which enforces maritime law for fisheries, surveillance, customs and bordercontrol, has conducted 59 patrols at a minimum distance of 0.28 nautical miles around theDiaoyu Islands since September 2012, when Japan announced a plan to "purchase" theislands.

The fleet was comprised of CCG 2350, 1123, 2102 and 2166.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
US has no embassy in Taiwan, because it doesn't recognize Taiwan as a sovereign country. For your reference, below is the list of embassies US keeps in East Asia region;
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Blackstone you your self said it" they perform consular duties. I said a embassy in all but name. Its a defacto embassy. With a ambassador like office held by "in active" diplomats. All the advantages none of the issues.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Blackstone you your self said it" they perform consular duties. I said a embassy in all but name. Its a defacto embassy. With a ambassador like office held by "in active" diplomats. All the advantages none of the issues.
So, a private NGO is an embassy in all but name? I don't buy that. In reality, US has been serious and almost perfectly consistent about its "One China" policy. The lone exception was in 1995/96 when PRC fired missiles near the Taiwan coast to warn pro-independent leaders not to wander off the reservation. In response, President Clinton sent two Carrier Battle Groups near the Taiwan Strait, and Beijing had to back down. The result is a massive and sustained PRC commitment to improving and modernizing its military, with PLAN and PLAAF getting special attention. Professor Andrew Erickson of the Naval War College said you could draw a straight line from US intervention in 1995/6 to today for Chinese efforts on A2/AD, space operations, PLAAF modernization, and creating a true Blue Water Navy.
 

Zetageist

Junior Member
I don't see anything improbable about Chinese Coast Guard vessels sailing near Luconia Shoals, maybe even dropping anchor for a bit. I think you mentioned the shoal is entitled to its own 12 NM of territorial sea so is it invading Malaysian EEZ if the shoal is disputed?

But I do not consider a Borneo Post article as validation that a specific Chinese CG vessel has been anchored and at station for 2 years. Infact, CCG 1123 was Haijian 23. It can't be at two places at once. It's only June 2015 and the articles below indicate the vessel was near Diaoyu less than 2 years ago and on multiple occasions. All of this means there's a lot of sensational reporting being done by the media.

From Wall Street Journal:

June 9, 2015 7:32 p.m. ET

The Journal got the scoop Monday that the Malaysian government will loudly protest the Chinese coast guard’s incursions into its exclusive economic zone. National Security Minister Shahidan Kassim said in an interview that Prime Minister
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
will raise the issue personally with Chinese President
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The Malaysians are upset that a Chinese coast-guard ship is anchored in the waters around the Luconia Shoals within their exclusive economic zone. The state-owned company Petronas has active gas wells nearby.

Kuala Lumpur played down such provocations in the past; Chinese ships have frequented the area for at least two years, and Malaysia made pro forma protests. The Chinese disrupted oil survey work nearby in August 2012 and January 2013. Yet Malaysia took a low-key approach when Beijing’s ally Cambodia shut down discussion of the South China Sea disputes at regional summits in 2012.

Malaysia has changed its attitude over the past year as China started reclaiming land for military bases on the disputed shoals and rocks it controls. Last year Kuala Lumpur offered to let the U.S. fly P-8 surveillance planes from Borneo airbases. At the Shangri-La Dialogue security conference in Singapore at the end of May, Defense Minister Hishammuddin Husseinwarned that the dispute could “escalate into one of the deadliest conflicts of our time.” Two weeks ago Mr. Najib was in Tokyo to discuss maritime defense-technology transfer with Prime MinisterShinzo Abe.

The Malaysians used to chastise Vietnam and the Philippines for being too confrontational toward China and called for diplomatic solutions. But it didn’t do them much good. The Chinese military is using the same tactics of creeping assertiveness in the Luconia Shoals that it employed in 2012 to take Scarborough Shoal from the Philippines. Beijing’s aggressive behavior has created such fear among Southeast Asian nations that a new unity may be emerging.
 
Last edited:

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Sounds like Malaysia was buttering up Beijing either for a negotiated deal behind the scenes or for assurances that the PRC would leave them alone and play the territorial games elsewhere.
It seems something changed and Kuala Lumpur came to the conclusion that the Chinese Dragon was not going away and was looking to muscle them out. So now they are looking to get allied to other states who are starring down the PRC 9 dash sumo.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Sounds like Malaysia was buttering up Beijing either for a negotiated deal behind the scenes or for assurances that the PRC would leave them alone and play the territorial games elsewhere.
It seems something changed and Kuala Lumpur came to the conclusion that the Chinese Dragon was not going away and was looking to muscle them out. So now they are looking to get allied to other states who are starring down the PRC 9 dash sumo.
It's clear Beijing is committed to "Monroe Doctrine" the SCS and turn it into a de facto Chinese lake. The thing I want to know is will Beijing be audacious enough to claim not just the islands and features inside 9DL, but the water too.
 
Top