In4ser
Junior Member
No, at the end of the day, it was death of American lives that served as the catalyst. Americans weren't going to let their own people die and not take action, just that simple. I don't doubt that USA had ulterior motives, but those motives such as 'balance of power', compassion, or greed weren't enough to convince the public which was then very isolationist. If that were the case the United States would have intervened much earlier, indeed they would have intervened against Nazi Germany before that. I do agree with that being strong motives as most historians believed that Roosevelt wanted to intervene earlier in Europe, but he couldn't get the support until after Pearl Harbor.
Sure, China owes USA, if you follow that logic of 'owing', then the same would apply that the Soviet Union 'owing' the United States.
The US never formally fought Japanese on Chinese soil, aid was largely logistical and financial. "Flying Tigers" were volunteers and not actual military personal. Instead its primary support was acting as a second front whereby weakening and dividing the Japanese capabilities and operations. However they never did the actual fighting against the Japanese in China, it was done by the Chinese themselves.
While I have no doubt it IJA could conquer much of China, I have my reservations of its ability to hold it. The Japanese were superior in conventional warfare and mostly against the KMT's NRA, which Japan had a distinct advantage. However it would be bogged down for years in guerrilla warfare, especially devastating in Communist occupied West, and likely insurgents in former KMT strongholds.
Still I wonder how a unified China fared against Japan with Sun Yat-sen, or would Sun Yat-sen try to appease them. Both KMT and CCP were both not fully invested into the war against Japan. The CCP wanted to be in position where they could fight the KMT effectively after the War. The KMT also did not want to have their forces take the brunt of the Japanese, while the CCP built it forces and capability.
Sure, China owes USA, if you follow that logic of 'owing', then the same would apply that the Soviet Union 'owing' the United States.
The US never formally fought Japanese on Chinese soil, aid was largely logistical and financial. "Flying Tigers" were volunteers and not actual military personal. Instead its primary support was acting as a second front whereby weakening and dividing the Japanese capabilities and operations. However they never did the actual fighting against the Japanese in China, it was done by the Chinese themselves.
While I have no doubt it IJA could conquer much of China, I have my reservations of its ability to hold it. The Japanese were superior in conventional warfare and mostly against the KMT's NRA, which Japan had a distinct advantage. However it would be bogged down for years in guerrilla warfare, especially devastating in Communist occupied West, and likely insurgents in former KMT strongholds.
Still I wonder how a unified China fared against Japan with Sun Yat-sen, or would Sun Yat-sen try to appease them. Both KMT and CCP were both not fully invested into the war against Japan. The CCP wanted to be in position where they could fight the KMT effectively after the War. The KMT also did not want to have their forces take the brunt of the Japanese, while the CCP built it forces and capability.
Last edited: