The_Zergling
Junior Member
Personally I would like to see the US and Russia, as the powers with by far the most warheads, engage in another round of talks to reduce their stockpiles. I don't think we'll see the end of nuclear weapons in our lifetime, but if we are to stop proliferation, the big powers need to show they're serious about reducing their arsenals. Currently I see no real reason why either Moscow or Washington need so many warheads, regardless of whether they're in "reserve" or not.
Frankly I think partial nuclear disarmament is like talking about partial circumcision. You either go all the way or forget about it. It's not as if "only" having 100 nukes will make the world safer. The fact that big powers are reluctant to even decrease the amount of nuclear warheads they have (let alone eliminate them) does not make for a very convincing argument against smaller countries that want a quick fix towards global influence via nuclear power.