Shenyang next gen combat aircraft thread

by78

General
Sharp silhouette.

54471134730_a3ba6e98e1_o.jpg
54470975759_c146b45f83_o.jpg
 

Alfa_Particle

Junior Member
Registered Member
Aesthetics wise, the groove doesn't look so bad, looks well contoured with no sharp, abrupt angles.
Y'know, the groove was hypothesised to be there for boundary layer redirection due to it using DSIs. But with this new image, it might be actually using boundary layer suction instead? Then I have hope for the groove being smoothed or even completely eliminated.
 

tamsen_ikard

Junior Member
Registered Member

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Via Huitong his enhanced version of the so far best image:

View attachment 150550

Provided that the details of the J-XDS from the photo processing is accurate and that the J-XDS has similar length as the J-20 family (~21.2 meters), that means the IWB(s) are about 4.5-4.7 meters long. That's certainly not anywhere close to be significantly longer than the IWBs on the J-20/A/S.

PL-17 certainly will not fit into the IWB(s) of the J-XDS, so I suppose we can put that contention to rest.

In addition, there is definitely no side IWBs present on the J-XDS. So, all we can hope for is for the IWB(s) to be wide enough (to fit more AAMs) and/or deep enough (to double-stack AAMs).
 
Top