From @huitong : "The domestic land-based variant for PLAN might be called J-35."
Where did he get the idea that this is a land-based variant rather than carrier-based?
Maybe there will be a land-base variant and a carrier based one. But that doesn't make much sense either since both are operated by navy.
A better translation would be preferred, though.快一年前就定了的事情。超大那些所谓的大神们消息滞后太严重,这个时候才达到高潮,yin水都干枯了。
From someone who said PLAAF will not introduce Su-35?According to , the decision to adopt the FC-31 was made almost a year ago and had been reported by the "big shrimps" then.
A better translation would be preferred, though.
From someone who said PLAAF will not introduce Su-35?
I should not judge one's credibility unless it is too waste of time for you turning over his words.So, fr6 isn't all that credible, then. How would you assess the credibility of the other two bloggers (pb19980515 and 草根设计师-CAD)?
I should not judge one's credibility unless it is too waste of time for you turning over his words.
Let me frame it another way: according to your sources, has the PLAN or PLAAF really selected the FC-31 design? Or at least something based on the FC-31?