HUGE if true. How solid is the source?
That's indeed the $$$$$ question ?
HUGE if true. How solid is the source?
I always thought the J31 was a little small for what China might need for carrier operations."Special units geared to working on the 5th gen. carrier borne fighter jet program have been established at 601 and 701 following the securing of preliminary funds from PLAN"
View attachment 38283
As a carrier air superiority fighter it is in a similiar weight class as the rest of the fighters use by other nations that operates aircraft carriers. We can expect the J15 to be further develop and play the role of a fighter bomber just like the F18's of which only the US and China would have as a combination.I always thought the J31 was a little small for what China might need for carrier operations.
But if need to change the current j31 to a carrier capable plane it'll take at least 3 or 4 more years of development. I'm assuming it's for catapult carriers only.
I always thought the J31 was a little small for what China might need for carrier operations.
But if need to change the current j31 to a carrier capable plane it'll take at least 3 or 4 more years of development. I'm assuming it's for catapult carriers only.
If they are than on the new version we can expect folding wings, possibly larger wings for more lift and range, Obviously a beefier tailhook and landing gear.The current belief is that SAC is in the process of enlarging the FC-31
What is the reason for not using the j-20 as basis for a carrier fighter?HUGE if true. How solid is the source?
What's your point?What is the reason for not using the j-20 as basis for a carrier fighter?
Before fighting keep in mind we have yet to hear confirmation.What is the reason for not using the j-20 as basis for a carrier fighter?
As a carrier air superiority fighter it is in a similiar weight class as the rest of the fighters use by other nations that operates aircraft carriers.