Some of those pictures aren't showing for me in that thread, but here're the ones that are:
I will not be dissapointed at all if SAC's 5th gen looks something like that. But smells too much of T-50 for me to take it seriously
Shenyang FC-31 / J-31 Fighter Demonstrator
- Thread starter RedSky
- Start date
- Status
Some of those pictures aren't showing for me in that thread, but here're the ones that are:
I will not be dissapointed at all if SAC's 5th gen looks something like that. But smells too much of T-50 for me to take it seriously
Just like the twin engined J-10 was all big news a few years ago.
Let's just sit back and wait, enjoy the show
You mean the J-20 isn't the twin engined J-10? I'm shocked D:
You kidd, of course?
I must say the supposed drawings of SAC's new fighter look to me a lot like what T-50 should've looked like
folks will sure be confused when it comes out and looks more "manouverable" than J-20, but the latter is the airdom fighter... heh
Deino, you said those pics were from paralay? But it links to CD... did CD copy it from paralay or vice versa or something? Wait -- is that drawing even meant to be of SAC's fighter?
Last edited:
Why a no-no?
--
anyway here are the rest of the pictures. Pretty consistent differences from the T-50, but meh I dunno..
Hyperwarp
Captain
Here are some early concept art done by Paralay & QuadroFX :
, , ,
At that time their primary guide was this image leaked by NPO Saturn :
From Russian RCS test video :
So the question is, will they represent what SAC is doing with their NGF. Thing is people like Paralay had that leaked Saturn image. I don't think there are any such leaks regarding the SAC NGF other than that blurry wind-tunnel model.
, , ,
At that time their primary guide was this image leaked by NPO Saturn :
From Russian RCS test video :
So the question is, will they represent what SAC is doing with their NGF. Thing is people like Paralay had that leaked Saturn image. I don't think there are any such leaks regarding the SAC NGF other than that blurry wind-tunnel model.
Red___Sword
Junior Member
Can we say that, the more it confirns (later) that this concept is what T50 Russian-self-usage would be - the more it revers proves (in a sense) that the current (ugly, to distinguish) T-50 is just a "marketing trick" for export?
Well, although we can not prove anything at this time yet, I strongly doubt the Russians would satisfy what the current T-50 can offer.
Well, although we can not prove anything at this time yet, I strongly doubt the Russians would satisfy what the current T-50 can offer.
I wonder why pepole are so sure the SAC J-XX will be named a number between 17 and 19? And we have no clue yet if it's more similar to the F-22 or the T-50.We only know several points here:
1.There is such a stealth fighter bomber project and it will be revealed in half a year.
2.It's a conventional design without the canard.
3.The PLAAF is got involved into this project and founded it.The SAC definatelly couldn't collect billions of RMB and the necessary resouces to practice such a project without the PLAAF's help.
1.There is such a stealth fighter bomber project and it will be revealed in half a year.
2.It's a conventional design without the canard.
3.The PLAAF is got involved into this project and founded it.The SAC definatelly couldn't collect billions of RMB and the necessary resouces to practice such a project without the PLAAF's help.
- Status