Yes, by @by78Has this picture been posted here before? An SPA based on what looks like a DF-17 TEL's chassis.
View attachment 105171
Yes, by @by78Has this picture been posted here before? An SPA based on what looks like a DF-17 TEL's chassis.
View attachment 105171
Thanks i didnt know about that. Seems like its less commonly seen compared to PCL181I thought PLZ-05B were already spotted
View attachment 106493
So far it appears to be still in the testing stage and hasn't been inducted in large numbers into PLAGF like PCL181Thanks i didnt know about that. Seems like its less commonly seen compared to PCL181
Didn't the PLZ-05A variant already significantly improve its mobility? Not sure how the firepower department has improved from the base to the A variant if there was any. From what I read, the PLZ-05B pictured above is mentioned to have an upgraded turret and elongated chassis though the exact details are unclear.I wonder if we're going to see a successor for the tracked PLZ-05, since it's an early 2000s design and some have said that Chinese engines/transmissions have improved a lot from that time
But then again it seems like the PLA prefers the wheeled PCL-181 more
This tweet author is implying the PLZ-05B is already in service (makes sense) but how would an optimized thin shell ammunition design and mfg process be directly tied to the PLZ-05B when the ammunition is likely able to be retroactively used with the earlier PLZ-05 variants unless there is a drastic change in chamber pressure of the gun of the PLZ-05B?News regarding the PLZ-05B. It seems the project is near its completion.
The author didn't claim the PLZ-05B was in service. He said LRIP had most likely commenced. LRIP always precedes operationality. And I don't think he refers to arty ammo. The term body shell is most likely about the vehicle. It refers to the hull of the vehicle.This tweet author is implying the PLZ-05B is already in service (makes sense) but how would an optimized thin shell ammunition design and mfg process be directly tied to the PLZ-05B when the ammunition is likely able to be retroactively used with the earlier PLZ-05 variants unless there is a drastic change in chamber pressure of the gun of the PLZ-05B?