I only follow news updates to see how consistent some information is on what the aircraft will have or not have. I am sure a lot of aviation fans have sometimes learned it the hard way like some believing a certain operational date of the Su-57 or how the F-35 would be the 1st to use DIRCM and neither of those have aged well. I also do admit I have a bias because I always overhype the aircraft multiple times.
1. Such as December 2018 internal hypersonic missile claim from tass, February 2020 claim that ammunition was created, found a 2018 source regarding a statement from Borisov that 6 new missiles will be given to the Su-57 in 2020(guess which one I assumed), tass source stating missiles will be made from scratch(guess which missile design I think was made from scratch that they were referring to) and that they will be ready by 2021, than of course on Christmas we get that latest news update again. Some missile projects like the Hermes were introduced earlier in the past but came out late in service so not having my hopes up till that is set in stone.
2. Seen Rostec 2014 introduced from Jo Asakura back at key aero, noticed that 3 of the 4 GaN MMICs(using UHF) are to be for the 3 airborne EW systems. Took KRETs 2015 pdf article that GaN MMIC is present in their EW system. Noticed that the Himalayas was mounted in late 2014, Khibiny-M L-265 mounted in 2016 in Syria for Su-35 and Tarantula mounted in May 2018. But of course it is not official just because those modules were introduced to be put in immediately later with no confirmation later.
3. Realized that in 2022-2024 there will be testing and that along those tests the Su-57 will receive new avionics. Realized the F-22 and F-35s had their radars upgraded later I assumed that the same should be for the Su-57 since it kept theirs since 2009. Pushing my hopes more for ROFAR instead of better AESA upgrade.
"
"Pica-M" is part of the brKR-3 on-board complex, which provides radar reconnaissance in all weather conditions and at any time of the day. The station has a mapping capacity of up to 1-1.5 m and an object detection range of up to 300 km. The radar successfully completed the state test program in 2016. At the same time, the "Research Kulon" on the order of the Ministry of Industry and Trade is developing the technology to create a fifth-generation side-view radar with an active phased antenna grille (AFAR)." For example if the avionics upgrade refers to the radar upgrades of the Su-57 than Kulon has a better chance of mounting new side arrays for the Su-57 in 2022 to begin two years of testing(took 2 years each for F-22 to test 3rd and 4th gen radars) to the end of 2024. This would immediately dismiss that the aircraft will not have ROFAR but talks of putting ROFAR on the Su-57 date back to 2014, realized that instead of RTI and KRET that a 3rd company VEGA is involved in photonic radars,
No. 1 (20) of 2018 RTI stated photonic integrated circuit production 3-5 years planned(not everything goes to plans) would mean that the production would begin 2021-2023. I also do not know if the new Su-57 in 2022-2024 would be just a single tested aircraft or involving multiple aircrafts and I do not know how many prototypes or which company would be involved or if their will be more companies with photonic radar prototypes than just KRET, RTI and VEGA. So if production begins in 2021, 2022, or 2023 will they have enough photonic integrated circuits to be mass produced into the new Su-57s? Also I do not doubt such claims because RTI is planning to have a 300ghz radar or above being created in 5 years to track very small drones and they have shown a video demonstration of a 10 meter corridor for airports using such high frequency radars to immediately identify what objects people are carrying walking through that corridor which is planned for 2021.
Its not that I love to j#$# off too much to the aircraft but it is hard for me to differentiate between what is important and what is not important for the options the aircraft will have later but I promise I don't go 110% into immediately believing that my opinions will be facts, I have done that in the past with those 3 points above and caused major headaches in forums because of that. If there is something physically new shown or received to the aircraft or given a name is when I will make those updates here with more belief that they are real. I will also avoid bringing up any of those 3 points above only if there is good proof of it and best to avoid them on non-russian forums because of how those have escalated.