Jura The idiot
General
this one was goodThat's why I limit my posts in Naval matters???
this one was goodThat's why I limit my posts in Naval matters???
I do not think you understood, in the original Russian sources, sometimes they appear only as part of the photo albums, sometimes they lack a description, sometimes they do have a very brief one like this oneSure, I understand that, but even if all you are able to share is the source, someone else may have some insight, or even recognize the camo pattern and have an idea of which aircraft it is likely to be?? PAK-FA is in flight test and only operates out of a very limited number of Bases at present??? but they are nice pictures.
No fan art and good almost all confirmed by others places, why you say it i don' t understand.Sorry ... but this is either some sort of fan-art or a media-representation .. barely anything close to a data-confirmation.
The thread is pretty good, the problem resides not in the thread it self but in the project it self, if you want information you need to see what the maker says this is what they sayHonestly ... the problem with this tread is that it is not a discussion tread but merely a collection of images, Russian reports of what should, could, must and will be ...
PAK FA (T-50)
History
The PAK FA took off for its first flight on January 29, 2010 in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. The first flight model of the fighter and a full ground test bed used for the testing of equipment and systems in support of the flight testing program were delivered to the JSC Sukhoi DB flight testing-and-development facility in the Town of Zhukovsky near Moscow on April 8. Upon completion of the required system and component-bed testing, including strength tests on the static airplane, ground testing of the test bed airplane and flight model, flight tests of the airplane under the preliminary testing program started on April 29, 2010.
The second flight model took off for its first flight at the Komsomolsk-on-Amur production site (KnAAZ) on March 3, 2011. After the completion of factory tests, it was included in the preliminary testing program.
The third flight model made its first flight on November 22, 2011. After the completion of a set of ground preparation works and re-equipment with an extended set of on-board equipment, it also entered the preliminary testing program.
The fourth and fifth PAK-FA flight models arrived at Zhukovsky airfield near Moscow on January 17, 2013 and November 20, 2013. The airplanes arrived from the Far East under their own power.
Currently, flight tests are being conducted with 5 flight models, along with ground testing on test beds.
Good stability and handling performance has been achieved at subsonic and supersonic speeds, at low and high altitudes, and at post-stall angles of attack. Avionics tests are in progress. Fight refueling and examination of the airplane’s behavior in different configurations have been successfully completed.
Main flight testing objectives at the current stage are the testing of combat system-operating modes, interfacing with weapons, and the use of weapon
The engine for the Russian fighter of the 5th generation, also known as the Sukhoi PAK FA (PAK FA), ahead of American engines for fighter aircraft 5th-generation and, in particular, F-119 to F-22 and F-135 F- 35. This korr.TASS said general designer - director of "OKB A.Lyulki." Branch of PJSC "Ufa Engine Industrial Association" (UMPO) Yevhen Marchuk.
"We are ahead of the US as engines began to make their later?" - Said general designer.
"Why lay in the engine that has achieved new engine always creates a little beyond existing knowledge It remains to confirm all its characteristics on tests?.", - He stressed.
Sorry as you said it is your humble opinion, it is your IMO.
Could You please give a proper translation or explain that strange statement ?
How could they be "ahead of American engines for fighter aircraft 5th-generation and, in particular, F-119 to F-22 and F-135 F- 35" if the T50 enters service with an interim eingine and even more since both US are already in service and both types entered service with their planned engine ??
IMO again the typical Russian blahblahblah since nothing else can be said ...
Why do not you do this post the classified information can you get it? no you can not, but you complain and complain and demand and demand, tell me what do you want? both of your claimed the T-50-5 was dead, you have no even a any source to support the supposedly structural troubles, nothing nil zero nada, ah but both of you come and say Russian sources are lying yes, and you what?So yes, those of us who care about accuracy, and want an accurate picture of the real world find these types of lies and mis-information disgraceful! the BRAT
an example of how reliable you are claiming T-5- 01 was unairworthySo Deino, can you post any links relating to the T-50 structural issues, I ran upon some one day, and have been unable to track them down since?? as I understand it O1 is unairworthy, and 02? was flying with 01 tail????, anyway if you have some links I would love to understand in more depth what has transpired, just because I am fascinated by these structural issues?