Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

G

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
AndrewJ said:
TWZ: Norway says it has detected several radiation spikes during its former tests, though not this time yet. So it's a flying Chernobyl. :eek:
Click to expand...
So it is a flying Chernobyl which emits no radiation. Right.

More dramatically, in 2019, an explosion occurred aboard a barge in the White Sea, outside Nenoksa, killing five Rosatom scientists. It also led to a radiation spike in the Russian city of Severodvinsk, as you can read more about here. The explosion has been blamed on a reactor from a Burevestnik recovered from the sea, likely the one that was lost in 2017.
Click to expand...
If it was on a barge in facilities operated by the Russian Navy it is way more likely the accident was with a Poseidon torpedo reactor. These people are retarded.

Poseidon is way more likely since they could be trying to test the reactor for it in sea state conditions. If it uses sodium as a coolant, a leak might have caused a sodium-water explosion.
 
G

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The Terminator wasn't made for long distance sniper fire in the first place. It is meant to spray an area at relatively close distance.

It is meant to shield tanks from close attacks by infantry or to work in urban warfare scenarios.
 
Last edited:
sheogorath

sheogorath

Colonel
Registered Member
gelgoog said:
The Terminator wasn't made for long distance sniper fire in the first place. It is meant to spray an area at relatively close distance.

It is meant to shield tanks from close attacks by infantry or to work in urban warfare scenarios.
Click to expand...

It's still an issue this is happening with only one gun firing, though.
 
G

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
It typically only fires one gun. Each gun fires a different ammo type. One has AP ammo and the other HE ammo. That is why it has two guns. It simplified the feeding mechanism.

That 30mm cannon is known to be like this in terms of accuracy.
 
Last edited:
G

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The gun isn't particularly accurate to begin with. And this weapon mount isn't that stable.
Things are just like that. It passed trials so it meets the original design spec. Whatever that was.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top