Way too much "defeatist" talk which is precisely the reason why Russia is in deep trouble as it is, facing brutal Imperial Alliance, with only Belarus as it's "shield".
I can't bother to reply to all of what you said, but calling Soviet allies and USSR itself as "bankrupt" is strange - using that as a excuse to bend over and being destroyed.
Do remind us of the countries that didn't bend over between 1989 - 1991 (China, Cuba, North Korea, Lao People's Republic, Vietnam). How was their economic situation between 1989 - 1991? Since according to you, the so-called "bankrupt USSR" had to bend over for a massive Zombie Demo-Crazy entry which has given Russia massive problems over the past 34 years.
2) There is a bigger chance that NATO will take St.Petersburg via Finland, or Murmansk via Norway and Finland) than Russia being able to take Tallinn, Vilnius and Riga in case NATO goes for a small Kaliningrad snack. Russia is still not able to take Sumy after (soon) 42 months, which is right there across the border.
It doesn't matter if Transnistria isn't part of Russia (Again, defeatist talk). What matters is that by saying that, you're allowing NATO to precisely prepare for a snack, and on the meny they'll have not only Transnistria, but also South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
Regarding S-400 and Turkey. They already have their own drones (which successfully whooped pro-Russian forces in Syria, Libya and Nagorno-K), and they have the project KAAN. Turkey could at any moment get rid of S-400 and be included back in the F-35 program, so I cannot see what Russia gained from this. There was a suggestion that Turkey could give these to the extremist Hindutva regime.
Either way, you fail to acknowledge that Russia screwed up with trusting a NATO member France regarding Mistrals and selling S-400 to another NATO member, Turkey.
3) Libya did order a nice package of weapons from Russia in January 2010. Libya was supposed to get at least 20 fighters (Su-30, I believe), several S-300PMU2 and MBTs such as T-72 and T-90.
Libya was, as we know, decimated 14 months later (March 2011), and Russia didn't deliver anything (AFAIK) as NATO decided to decimate the whole country into pieces and it took only a few months to do so.
Regarding Gorba and Yeltsin, the fact is: Russians failed to defend the structure of the USSR that 27 million Soviet citizens gave their life for during WW2.
In my previous reply, I forgot to mention the idiot who basically attempted to coup Putin just 2 years ago - you know, the Wagner Egg Head, and the fact that he even dared to do this just 2 years ago, tells me more than enough that Russia and Putin do NOT have sufficient control of whatever the fvck is going on. The Wagner Egg Head even dared to fire upon other Russian forces INSIDE Russia along with his pro-Wagner troops - and he killed several Russian personnel along with destroying Russian equipment, before he was stopped in his tracks.
Therefore, Russia and Putin "planning something" up until 2050 (For example Navy strategy) is simply a joke, as one cannot trust what will happen in Russia, especially when Putin dies.