Russian industrial base has lack of know-how in lithium ion batteries. Other than some companies which assemble electric buses. From I heard they are experimenting with making a safe submarine grade battery pack but the R&D is quite far from done at this time.February 2023 interview with USC Chairman Alexey Rakhmanov. I have excerpted most interesting bits about ongoing submarine AIP development
The Russians are also skittish about using hydrogen fuel in submarines, because you would need to upgrade submarine bases to handle this fuel, and they would also need to develop hydrogen storage methods which they currently lack, not to mention fuel cells. So using hydrogen directly is considered to be a non-starter. They are working on making a device for reforming hydrogen from diesel fuel, which would solve many of these issues, but they have not got that working either (neither have the other countries working on this thus far). So some people are talking about just putting a small nuclear reactor into the smaller submarines. The Russians have projects for micro-reactors like the one for SHELF with 10MW power.
I got more information on this recently. The whole process of construction of the initial Leader icebreaker is delayed. It was planned that welding of the hull would be 15% complete right now, and it is like 5% complete. They need to recruit more welders willing to work on the Far East. The construction of the RITM-400 nuclear reactor is also slightly delayed, as are the deliveries of some forged components in the propulsion section, component delivery for Leader is expected to be delayed by 2-3 years. Given these considerations they cancelled further construction of Leader class icebreakers beyond the first one, until delays are solved, and increased the order for Project 22220 which can be delivered in the near term.The 2027/2030/2033 schedule did seem very aggressive. I don't necessarily believe that it has anything to do with scaling back of ambitions owing to Ukraine, as in the similar timeframe when this decision has been taken (i.e. over the last year or so) we have also seen the approval of a further two Pr. 22220 nuclear icebreakers, in fact to be delivered earlier, which implies greater near-term budget allocation.