The submarine program using up the best part of the funding of the Russian navy,You can tell the new Borei-A class on top has a lot smoother hull, and is likely both more hydrodynamic and silent than the older Borei class at the bottom.
Looks like a great design and the Russians are producing them in quite substantial numbers.
One of the few Russian Navy programs which isn't a disaster.
The submarine program using up the best part of the funding of the Russian navy,
At the moment the build rate is the same as the USA - one sub in each year.
And the russians subs are more complicated and advanced than the USA ones - means they are more expensive .
It’s newer that’s about it.I'm curious to know what makes the the Russian sub more complicated and advanced than their US counterparts.
I am the only one who read the specifications of submarines ?I'm curious to know what makes the the Russian sub more complicated and advanced than their US counterparts.
Apples to Potatoes?I am the only one who read the specifications of submarines ?
Virginia has four 533 mm torpedo tubes, and 12 tomahawk VLS for small / short tomahawk missiles.
Yassen has six 650mm tube AND two 533mm, and 40 subsonic or 32 supersonic missile ( later can't fit into the Virginia)
Different missions. Virginia was designed for special operationsJust for reference , the Seawolf that designed to counter the Akulas has eight (!!!!) 660mm tube .
larger size perhaps. But again mission the main goal of Yasen is to succeed Oskar class boats which target surface attack.And this is just the beginning, the Yassen double hull design, so it has more streamlined form with lower acoustic signatures at higher speed , space for decoys/ countermeasures and so on.
again lateral war deploying SF and making strikes in the Gulf vs a nation that kept building to fight the US.Oh, and it can dive deeper.
Interesting ,you confess that the Yassen made to hunt submarines ( like Seawolf) and the Virginia to attack developing nations, but don't want to accept that the Yassen ( or Seawolf, as a matter of fact ) more sophisticated , superior and advanced than the Virginia, because of its target is not against an RPG-7, but another nuclear submarine : )Apples to Potatoes?
Bigger tubes don’t mean much in torpedos as a direct hit from any torpedo is game over.
You point to the potential load of the VLS alone yet fail to consider two things.
- The Torpedo tubes can also fire missiles.
- The counterpart to Yasen is not Virginia but Ohio SSGN that’s 22 tubes with 7 cruise missiles for 154 cruise missiles the Virginia class Block V would be the Yasen’s direct counter part which is planes for 4 large VLS with 7 missiles per tube
Different missions. Virginia was designed for special operations
Sea wolf was designed to hunt Akula
larger size perhaps. But again mission the main goal of Yasen is to succeed Oskar class boats which target surface attack.
Claims on sound and speed are debatable. Cost is not but being more expensive doesn’t mean more advanced. It can just as easily be the result of limited resources.
again lateral war deploying SF and making strikes in the Gulf vs a nation that kept building to fight the US.
[
Farther more he was asking about