The first or one other in the video ? but in service since a year yet 10, former TU-95MS-16, MS-6 no mordernized for Engels in first logic.
Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.
- Thread starter tphuang
- Start date
Wooww ! 
Powerful war machine ofc with unusual arrangment for a Russian as US Subs TT on the sides, only 533 mm no 650 and " one hull and half ".
Wide as an Akula 13.5 m but more long 119 m, able to move to 31 kn, dive max 600 m as Akula, Sierra, Oscar, seems reactor have a service life of 25/30 years which is a big progress for Russian.
Small crew for a big Sub 90 sailors, Russians have less numerous than US.
62 weapons !
Seems the new variant 885M don't have a pump jet.
Powerful war machine ofc with unusual arrangment for a Russian as US Subs TT on the sides, only 533 mm no 650 and " one hull and half ".
Wide as an Akula 13.5 m but more long 119 m, able to move to 31 kn, dive max 600 m as Akula, Sierra, Oscar, seems reactor have a service life of 25/30 years which is a big progress for Russian.
Small crew for a big Sub 90 sailors, Russians have less numerous than US.
62 weapons !
Seems the new variant 885M don't have a pump jet.
Last edited:
The Yasen is a GREAT design.Wooww !
Powerful war machine ofc with unusual arrangment for a Russian as US Subs TT on the sides, only 533 mm no 650 and " one hull and half ".
Wide as an Akula 13.5 m but more long 119 m, able to move to 31 kn, dive max 600 m as Akula, Sierra, Oscar, seems reactor have a service life of 25/30 years which is a big progress for Russian.
Small crew for a big Sub 90 sailors, Russians have less numerous than US.
62 weapons !
Seems the new variant 885M don't have a pump jet.
View attachment 29697
Only trouble is, it took them 15+ years to commission the 1st, and now seven years to launch the second (which is not commissioned yet).
The Russians are simply hobbled in production. They will be lucky to have five of these by 2025.
The US has now launched 14 Virginia class SSNs (which are every bit as good in terms of warfare, and better in terms of electronics and sensors) in far less time, and have six more at various stages of building, and ten more beyond that approved.
So, by 2025, the US will have something on the order of 28-30 Virginia's and the Russians may have five Yasens.
Really amazing view !
Right ! and lont ime for build finaly now ramp up in progress it is the most expensive Russian Subs much more than Borey IIRC the first have cost 2 billions $ ! enormous for a Russian which buil cheaper, next less expensive.
Yasen very powerful but less quiet than last US and US sonars, fire control systems are very reputed for be the besy, so in a dual normaly US win, detect and fire in first.
For the double hull many decades Russians do Nuclears, Kilo also but no Lada, no sure for Borey and as i have say Yasen 1.5 hull.
Advantages :
Subs more resistant dive deeper in general 600 m as Seawolf only no Russian, more resistant* to damages less chance for a critical hit a torpedo breach the interior pressure hull also better buoyancy.
* Oscar II more vulnerable with big missile between the 2 hulls.
Disadvantages :
Definitely more difficult to build but mainly with huge ballasts between the hulls more long to to fill or empty definitely more long for plunge or do surface and need much more holes enough big so the hull is less hydrodynamic, Subs more noisy.
Right ! and lont ime for build finaly now ramp up in progress it is the most expensive Russian Subs much more than Borey IIRC the first have cost 2 billions $ ! enormous for a Russian which buil cheaper, next less expensive.
Yasen very powerful but less quiet than last US and US sonars, fire control systems are very reputed for be the besy, so in a dual normaly US win, detect and fire in first.
For the double hull many decades Russians do Nuclears, Kilo also but no Lada, no sure for Borey and as i have say Yasen 1.5 hull.
Advantages :
Subs more resistant dive deeper in general 600 m as Seawolf only no Russian, more resistant* to damages less chance for a critical hit a torpedo breach the interior pressure hull also better buoyancy.
* Oscar II more vulnerable with big missile between the 2 hulls.
Disadvantages :
Definitely more difficult to build but mainly with huge ballasts between the hulls more long to to fill or empty definitely more long for plunge or do surface and need much more holes enough big so the hull is less hydrodynamic, Subs more noisy.
Jura The idiot
General
related to
but likely a bigger problem is going to be the reduction gear(s) ... the task for Saint Petersburg
I mean it all then critically depends on tiny components, and for me that's a typical example for
If Something May Fail, It Will
... I've read in Russian Internet at one point strong enough turbine(s) almost certainly can be obtained from Rybinsk
but likely a bigger problem is going to be the reduction gear(s) ... the task for Saint Petersburg
I mean it all then critically depends on tiny components, and for me that's a typical example for
If Something May Fail, It Will
This will be good for India. They already have six Talwars, now with these three they will have nine of these very decent frigates.
The main difference in these, as can be seen, is that the Talwar FFGs that went to India have the single arm launcher for its anti-air missiles forward, while the Project 11356 use VLS for the anti-air.
Indian Talwar Class
Project 11356 class
I am thinking that the new FFGs for India will have the VLS.
Yep, only difference except design a little more stealth, helipad, the SAM laucher with arm replaced by a VLS, same number of SAM 24 but rate of fire 10 miss/mn vs 30 max but same FC radar MR-90 Orekh x 4 1 target engaged max by radar so 4 in fact limit the more big rate of fire especialy vs target to long range need more time for engagement.
SA-N-6/20 " VLS " max 20 miss/mn revolver system different but the fist VLS in service.
Redut/Polyment as MK-41, 60
The best with arms MK-26, 12 was a very good system.
I see Jura rather interested by some prices if India buy
SA-N-6/20 " VLS " max 20 miss/mn revolver system different but the fist VLS in service.
Redut/Polyment as MK-41, 60
The best with arms MK-26, 12 was a very good system.
I see Jura rather interested by some prices if India buy
