Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Soldier30

Senior Member
Registered Member
The New Year's batch of T-90M and T-72B3M tanks has entered service with the Russian Armed Forces. The tanks were manufactured at the Russian tank plant Uralvagonzavod. Over the past few years, over a hundred changes have been made to the design of Russian tanks. The tanks are now equipped with anti-FVP drone nets and rubber-reinforced protection, the "Mangal" type of protection. The rear, engine, and engine-transmission compartment of the tanks have received additional protection. In addition, the equipment is equipped with means of reducing visibility and electronic warfare systems to counter drones.

 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Now I'm surprised!... is this official and since when has it been known? Due to the similarity to the DART, this has been rumoured for years but also whether Wanfeng is developing a sinofied version for the PLAAF. The fact that it is now being developed for RU is new to me.
UZGA started out assembling twin engine Diamond DA42 aircraft kits for civilian pilot training in Russia under license.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Russian Air Force also ordered some Diamond DA42 aircraft from them. Diamond is an Austrian company, i.e. a neutral country in the EU, but not in NATO. And right now they are owned by a Chinese parent company i.e. Wanfeng Aviation like you said.

My guess is it at least started out as a total DART clone, but then UZGA modified the design. Like @sahureka said the wings in the serial production aircraft look different as well as other design elements.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

UZGA used to just build aircraft under license but increasingly they are making their own designs like the LMS-901 Baikal. They also have their own engine design bureau. This engine design bureau got assigned several tasks. The serial production of the VK-800 turboprop engine, and the serial production of the Motor-Sich D-18T engine for the An-124.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The New Year's batch of T-90M and T-72B3M tanks has entered service with the Russian Armed Forces. The tanks were manufactured at the Russian tank plant Uralvagonzavod. Over the past few years, over a hundred changes have been made to the design of Russian tanks. The tanks are now equipped with anti-FVP drone nets and rubber-reinforced protection, the "Mangal" type of protection.
I am surprised they haven't tried putting their T-64 tanks into use. I think they have at least a thousand in storage. Maybe it is just to avoid confusion with enemy tanks. Thus far only the Donbass militia used to use these tanks.

Uzbekistan has modified their T-64s to use the V-84 engine of the T-72.

1735694887775.jpeg

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

So even that weird horizontal engine (5TD or 6TD) in the T-64 wouldn't be an issue.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

Stealthflanker

Senior Member
Registered Member
I guess the VMF will be more convinced to buy Ka-52 for their forces now. Always find it unfortunate to see they try repelling USV attacks at Black Sea in extremely close proximity with doorgun when Ka-52 can do it much safer distance using their Vikhr and search the targets with their Arbalet radar.

and more press to get the Brimestone analogue based on the Kh-39 for perhaps Sukhoi and UAV's.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
I guess the VMF will be more convinced to buy Ka-52 for their forces now. Always find it unfortunate to see they try repelling USV attacks at Black Sea in extremely close proximity with doorgun when Ka-52 can do it much safer distance using their Vikhr and search the targets with their Arbalet radar.
Agreed. I think the acquisition is long overdue. They do not need the Ka-52K maritime version with all the trimmings for ship storage with foldable rotor blades either. A slightly modified regular Ka-52 with maybe the support for ejection over water would be enough.

and more press to get the Brimestone analogue based on the Kh-39 for perhaps Sukhoi and UAV's.
The thing is the Russians likely cannot manufacture such electronics for millimeter wave sensors cheaply. Russian weapon systems are typically designed for mass usage in case of war. They would rather have the millimeter wave sensor on the aircraft and use cheaper missile guidance.
 
Last edited:

pmc

Major
Registered Member
some new speculation about PAK-DA and it should be close to official. payload and fuel load cannot be that much less since it may need launch sea drones, heavier hypersonic weopons and now even larger warheads are needed since advancement in fortifications and spreading the ammunition over larger area.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The aircraft complex will have a "flying wing" aerodynamic configuration and will be subsonic. This choice is due to the requirements for the aircraft - the "flying wing" has more internal space for payload and with the placement of weapons in internal compartments and at subsonic speed, the best flight range indicators are achieved.

The use of missile weapons is expected without entering the air defense zone of a potential enemy. It is quite possible that such aircraft will remain in waiting zones for a long time - over deserted areas of the World Ocean or the Far North.
The new aircraft will have reduced radar visibility. The main armament will be advanced subsonic cruise and hypersonic missiles. It is believed that the payload mass of the PAK DA may be up to 30 tons, which means that the bomber will be able to carry at least 12 cruise missiles in its weapons bays. The total takeoff mass of the aircraft, according to experts, may be 145 tons.

Of course, the newest aircraft will be equipped with the most advanced radio-technical equipment and a defense system that will allow jamming any guidance systems. It is difficult to predict the readiness of the new aircraft, but the new machine should make its first flight in the next few years, and by 2030, serial production of the new "strategist" will probably begin. During the 2030s, the PAK DA should become the main aircraft of the long-range aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces.

I watched the Tu-160M Programme. They didnot disclose the new cockpit and the internal bays but what was new information presented that the previous version of Tu-160 could reach Mach 1.7 with 25 tons payload. and the new one not only has more economical engines for increased range but also increased Thrust. the previous one is capable for 25 hours flights and this new one with more cockpit comfort will surpass that figures. It is turning into airborne command post with much longer loitering time than AWACS. They have started putting new engines since 2020 and obviously stated that this most advanced engine created.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

December 23, 2024​

Russia Receives First Modernized Tupolev Tu-160M Strategic Bomber​



1735775233821.png
1735775292886.png





 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
I am surprised they haven't tried putting their T-64 tanks into use. I think they have at least a thousand in storage. Maybe it is just to avoid confusion with enemy tanks. Thus far only the Donbass militia used to use these tanks.

Uzbekistan has modified their T-64s to use the V-84 engine of the T-72.

View attachment 142308

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

So even that weird horizontal engine (5TD or 6TD) in the T-64 wouldn't be an issue.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The Donbass militias, which are now either special forces detachments or newly formed Motorized Rifle Brigades of the RuAF, use captured ex-AFU T-64BV. The ones the Russians have in storage are probably untouched yet except for parts cannibalization.

These special forces units and brigades are typically employed with Group Center and Group East, often the spear tips of the advance, and these two army groups combined has shown the most progress. So even these captured tanks could be seeing plenty of action. Both sides use many common vehicles, BMP-1, BMP-2, BTR-80, 2S1, 2S3, MT-LB and T-72 in large quantities and extensively, so friendly fire issues are brushed about.

Most probably the issue of Russians taking tanks from graveyards have more to do with cannibalization, and centered more with the BTRs, BMPs, and the SPGs rather than the tanks. I have yet to see a single T-54/55 other than Slovakian M-55; the T-62s seen that were actually deployed are rare that it must have been a one off test modernization batch for trial deployment. My guess is that the battlefield attrition does not exceed that of the sum of newly built + modernized from mothballs + resurrected from damaged/destroyed + repurposed from captured/trophy tanks. Especially when they are advancing, the Russians have much better opportunities to recover downed tanks.
 

lucretius

Junior Member
Registered Member
653 T-64's in storage according to OSINT, all in poor to terrible condition. They fall into the "complicated old tanks" category, so tooling and parts compatibility is going to be an issue.

The T-72 Ural/A's have hardly been touched either.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
I guess the VMF will be more convinced to buy Ka-52 for their forces now. Always find it unfortunate to see they try repelling USV attacks at Black Sea in extremely close proximity with doorgun when Ka-52 can do it much safer distance using their Vikhr and search the targets with their Arbalet radar.
Russian ATGMs with their death spirals aren't exactly well positioned to hit slender surface vessels.

In an ironic twist of fate, it was very visible last summer that it's much easier for them to hit Bradley's rather than bmp-1s.

Easier because there was western assumption, that height won't matter for a precision weapon. But it matters, because someone saves money on a set of control surfaces.

Simple straightforward answer is your own FPVs.
 
Top