As in the previous post, 52.68 Yuan, I have a JD Plus membership and used a coupon. The orignial Price was 59 Yuan.
Real life thread
- Thread starter airsuperiority
- Start date
broadsword
Brigadier
Too bad JD is not available internationally if I'm not wrong. Also not in English.
Last night I had a nightmare in which one of my greatest fears came true.
I was banned from SDF.
Yep, despite being one of the world's foremost experts on PLA watching, despite my unprecedented discoveries involving the Type 003 and H-20, I was banned.
In my nightmare, I was posting on a random thread. I don't remember what it was. Everybody was breaking the rules as usual - in the same way that "Breaking & World News! III NO DISCUSSION!!" is mostly discussion.
In that thread, I made a post mocking someone or something. Perhaps I was mocking the Cuck of Kiev. I don't think so. I don't remember. I do remember there being a playground. But I wasn't in the playground. I was sitting behind the wall next to it. The wall was big and black. I know that behind the wall there was a playground.
Anyways, I made my usual outstanding contribution to SDF. As per usual, it got lots of "Likes," which was my intention.
Then, as I clicked the next page, it happened.
Moderator intervention.
I saw the following.
EVERYBODY PLEASE STOP MAKING OFF-TOPIC POSTS!!!!! If you continue to do so, you WILL BE BANNED.
HADOREN is banned for using a quotation.
Member A is banned for Reason XXX.
Member B is banned for Reason YYY.
Member C is banned for Reason ZZZ.
Yep, lots of people were banned, including me. It was totally unfair and as usual the rules were applied in a completely arbitrary and inconsistent manner.
Guess who banned me? It was not Deino, contrary to popular belief. It was T-U-P.
I thought about begging Blitzo to be unbanned. But I decided to be an honest man and take the hit. It was probably only a temporary ban anyways. I definitely hadn't done anything to deserve a full ban.
Next I clicked "New posts," as per usual, to see the newest posts. But I couldn't as I was banned. I also tried to click a link. But the page came up blank (with only the SDF header and footer) because I was banned.
For a moment, I was depressed. But then I realised that my posts could still be liked. So I could still get lots of "Likes." That made me feel better.
I also wanted to find out whether or not it was a permanent ban. It was definitely probably temporary. I definitely hadn't done anything to deserve a full ban. So here came the moment of truth.
I clicked the thread "Banned & Warned Members List."
Was I banned permanently? I was about to find out.
Then I woke up.
I was banned from SDF.
Yep, despite being one of the world's foremost experts on PLA watching, despite my unprecedented discoveries involving the Type 003 and H-20, I was banned.
In my nightmare, I was posting on a random thread. I don't remember what it was. Everybody was breaking the rules as usual - in the same way that "Breaking & World News! III NO DISCUSSION!!" is mostly discussion.
In that thread, I made a post mocking someone or something. Perhaps I was mocking the Cuck of Kiev. I don't think so. I don't remember. I do remember there being a playground. But I wasn't in the playground. I was sitting behind the wall next to it. The wall was big and black. I know that behind the wall there was a playground.
Anyways, I made my usual outstanding contribution to SDF. As per usual, it got lots of "Likes," which was my intention.
Then, as I clicked the next page, it happened.
Moderator intervention.
I saw the following.
EVERYBODY PLEASE STOP MAKING OFF-TOPIC POSTS!!!!! If you continue to do so, you WILL BE BANNED.
HADOREN is banned for using a quotation.
Member A is banned for Reason XXX.
Member B is banned for Reason YYY.
Member C is banned for Reason ZZZ.
Yep, lots of people were banned, including me. It was totally unfair and as usual the rules were applied in a completely arbitrary and inconsistent manner.
Guess who banned me? It was not Deino, contrary to popular belief. It was T-U-P.
I thought about begging Blitzo to be unbanned. But I decided to be an honest man and take the hit. It was probably only a temporary ban anyways. I definitely hadn't done anything to deserve a full ban.
Next I clicked "New posts," as per usual, to see the newest posts. But I couldn't as I was banned. I also tried to click a link. But the page came up blank (with only the SDF header and footer) because I was banned.
For a moment, I was depressed. But then I realised that my posts could still be liked. So I could still get lots of "Likes." That made me feel better.
I also wanted to find out whether or not it was a permanent ban. It was definitely probably temporary. I definitely hadn't done anything to deserve a full ban. So here came the moment of truth.
I clicked the thread "Banned & Warned Members List."
Was I banned permanently? I was about to find out.
Then I woke up.
PiSigma
"the engineer"
Just a reminder, blue and red bolded font is reserved for moderators. Take that as a formal warning lol
The real question is how many minutes into the race does Verstappen start whining?
Ah, Max and RB are in bad luck tonight. He did whine, tho, when his ride started losing power.
Also tonight Zhou Guanyu acquired his very first point for Alfa Romeo. Congrats, and we are proud of him. Keep it that way.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
I recently had to take the mandatory state of California sexual harassment training course for everyone that works in the state. I easily passed because I understand what the boundaries are. But it's funny how what this training course teaches what is and what isn't harassment is being violated by those that are more in the focus of who they're trying to protect. Basically people aren't allowed to forced themselves or any of their ideas onto others which if they violate can be considered harassment.
Apparently the Met Gala was last night. It's a celebration of fashion. And on the news this morning they were saying men wearing skirts was the norm now. There was a picture they showed of a man wearing a skirt with his ugly-azz hairy legs... No, it isn't. This is where I get how the they say the left has gone too far. Men wearing skirts is not a thing or normal in everyday life. If there are guys wearing skirts, then have at it but to proclaim it's the norm when it's not is indoctrination. Look at the iconic Playboy magazine. Now they have transexual playboy models. They just killed the majority of their business. Was this an attempt to "normalize" to heterosexual men that lusting over "men" was okay? I accept that LBGTQ people exist and have no problem that they live out their lives without harassment but don't turn it around and try to turn heterosexuals just like people don't like how there are those organizations that think they can turn gays in heterosexuals. I've been around long enough to see the contradictions. There was a time when leftist said being gay was genetic. Now they say it's by choice. The contradiction is because they want to pick and choose the benefits that work from both for their cause. Yet the left seems to want to violate it for heterosexuals.
Here's the thing about the victim culture of the West. They allow official "victims" to discriminates against others they don't want being done to themselves as if it were a balancing of the scales and guess what? It's usually done against people who didn't do the crime against them. When it's not straight whites that are racist against Asians, who do I see being racist? It's people who are "official" victims of the West hiding behind their victimization being racist towards Asians who don't have a history of doing anything to them. And the irony is they want to co-exist and live in peace with those who are their historic oppressors. This must be Stockholm Syndrome. And you can't bring this up because it's like retraumatizing them being a victim that their fragile little minds can't take. What a load of bull just cover up the natural racism they have in the first place. These are the kind of values they want to force on the Chinese. How absurd some will say. And yet when Bruce Jenner turned into Caitlyn Jenner, the Western media had articles on how China had a problem with transexuals as if the West gets to decide what social issues are important to the Chinese and everyone in the world. They're not important to the Chinese just like in the US, racism against Asians is not as important as homophobia in the US. That's how you turn it against them when they try to turn Chinese into the villain for whatever cause of the month has their attention. You see it with Ukraine where they think there's something wrong with you if you don't see it as serious as they do. Too bad they don't see that in the wars they've committed on others. They want to make it seem when they commit wars, it's somehow clean and they only attack and target the guilty. Anyone civilized see war is of last resort because every other option has not worked. And yet when they drop their bombs and explode to make sure everything is destroyed around it, they want to make everyone believe they only kill the guilty. Is this is what's best for the world as they would hide behind or is it to get their people to forget their crimes they committed. When you see who gets all the important attention for being victims in society today, they all happen to be groups where whites are the face of being victimized. i.e. women and gays. How convenient that everyone else gets pushed aside to make way for victims who are white.
White liberals are quick to say and believe liberals can't be racist. They think just because they're progressive and open, they can't be racist. They embrace positive prejudice for themselves when they generalize all liberals can't be racist but somehow we're suppose to believe they don't embrace the negative. It's prejudice whether it's designed to blindly protect or discriminate for a whole group of people so they're very capable of doing both and have them work together. The right-wing is using left-wing causes like human rights against China and we know the right-wing wants to commit human rights violations because that's what they're about wanting a racial hierarchy where those above have more rights than those below. I hear plenty of times from the right that if you're not American, you don't have the same rights like they do. If human rights are sacred, why do they think they get establish in a hierarchy who has more rights than others? So what would both Republicans and Democrats do to China where they think they have a right too impose their twisted sense of what's right onto the Chinese? That's not a human rights violation? And they will never see it that way because they stand for human rights and that's only a good thing...
Apparently the Met Gala was last night. It's a celebration of fashion. And on the news this morning they were saying men wearing skirts was the norm now. There was a picture they showed of a man wearing a skirt with his ugly-azz hairy legs... No, it isn't. This is where I get how the they say the left has gone too far. Men wearing skirts is not a thing or normal in everyday life. If there are guys wearing skirts, then have at it but to proclaim it's the norm when it's not is indoctrination. Look at the iconic Playboy magazine. Now they have transexual playboy models. They just killed the majority of their business. Was this an attempt to "normalize" to heterosexual men that lusting over "men" was okay? I accept that LBGTQ people exist and have no problem that they live out their lives without harassment but don't turn it around and try to turn heterosexuals just like people don't like how there are those organizations that think they can turn gays in heterosexuals. I've been around long enough to see the contradictions. There was a time when leftist said being gay was genetic. Now they say it's by choice. The contradiction is because they want to pick and choose the benefits that work from both for their cause. Yet the left seems to want to violate it for heterosexuals.
Here's the thing about the victim culture of the West. They allow official "victims" to discriminates against others they don't want being done to themselves as if it were a balancing of the scales and guess what? It's usually done against people who didn't do the crime against them. When it's not straight whites that are racist against Asians, who do I see being racist? It's people who are "official" victims of the West hiding behind their victimization being racist towards Asians who don't have a history of doing anything to them. And the irony is they want to co-exist and live in peace with those who are their historic oppressors. This must be Stockholm Syndrome. And you can't bring this up because it's like retraumatizing them being a victim that their fragile little minds can't take. What a load of bull just cover up the natural racism they have in the first place. These are the kind of values they want to force on the Chinese. How absurd some will say. And yet when Bruce Jenner turned into Caitlyn Jenner, the Western media had articles on how China had a problem with transexuals as if the West gets to decide what social issues are important to the Chinese and everyone in the world. They're not important to the Chinese just like in the US, racism against Asians is not as important as homophobia in the US. That's how you turn it against them when they try to turn Chinese into the villain for whatever cause of the month has their attention. You see it with Ukraine where they think there's something wrong with you if you don't see it as serious as they do. Too bad they don't see that in the wars they've committed on others. They want to make it seem when they commit wars, it's somehow clean and they only attack and target the guilty. Anyone civilized see war is of last resort because every other option has not worked. And yet when they drop their bombs and explode to make sure everything is destroyed around it, they want to make everyone believe they only kill the guilty. Is this is what's best for the world as they would hide behind or is it to get their people to forget their crimes they committed. When you see who gets all the important attention for being victims in society today, they all happen to be groups where whites are the face of being victimized. i.e. women and gays. How convenient that everyone else gets pushed aside to make way for victims who are white.
White liberals are quick to say and believe liberals can't be racist. They think just because they're progressive and open, they can't be racist. They embrace positive prejudice for themselves when they generalize all liberals can't be racist but somehow we're suppose to believe they don't embrace the negative. It's prejudice whether it's designed to blindly protect or discriminate for a whole group of people so they're very capable of doing both and have them work together. The right-wing is using left-wing causes like human rights against China and we know the right-wing wants to commit human rights violations because that's what they're about wanting a racial hierarchy where those above have more rights than those below. I hear plenty of times from the right that if you're not American, you don't have the same rights like they do. If human rights are sacred, why do they think they get establish in a hierarchy who has more rights than others? So what would both Republicans and Democrats do to China where they think they have a right too impose their twisted sense of what's right onto the Chinese? That's not a human rights violation? And they will never see it that way because they stand for human rights and that's only a good thing...
Equation
Lieutenant General
Bottom line, the West ultra left and ultra right values and beliefs sucks. They can't keep it just to themselves. They need the entire world (especially China) to abide by their ways for their prejudice and white supremacy sake. They both are the same really.