PLAN Pictures Thread 3

[xihaoli]

Re: PLAN Pic Thread 3

What is your source of the submarine comparison picture??? Is it fan art, or something based on actual data? From the looks of it the song would go into the 5000+ ton dived range, considering that the kilo is 4000 tons exact. Interestingly, the length of the romaros mings kilos and songs are all pretty accurate.

 

[swimmerXC]

Re: PLAN Pic Thread 3

What is your source of the submarine comparison picture??? Is it fan art, or something based on actual data? From the looks of it the song would go into the 5000+ ton dived range, considering that the kilo is 4000 tons exact. Interestingly, the length of the romaros mings kilos and songs are all pretty accurate.

I got it from War-Sky a couple of months ago, it's been on my HD but I never displayed it
I'm pretty sure it's fan art, remember PLAN never reveals anything :china:

 

[tphuang]

Re: PLAN Pic Thread 3

937 and 512, can't remember what they are

 

[swimmerXC]

Re: PLAN Pic Thread 3

937 and 512, can't remember what they are
[

supply ship (notice the AK-630's) and thailand OPV
FAC

 

[swimmerXC]

Re: PLAN Pic Thread 3

730 CIWS, 891 notice the PAR, FAC, sister ship to 970 test ship (the one that tested HQ-9 VLS SAM and YJ-63 SSM on 52C)

 

[xihaoli]

Re: PLAN Pic Thread 3

Dam it you beat me to it...

Is that really the size of the 2208 FAC (I presume it's some kind of block 20 vessal?) The thing looks king of big for a 220 ton FAC as described by Janes. You also get the perspective of humans which really brings it in perspective.

The most striking features of this ship is the slightly elivated incline and the object placed between the pilot cabin and the presumed missile tobes. Also notice the surface/airial/scanning radar dome.....Wouldn't all these features really increase the RCS of the "stealthy" fac?

Could the incline be some kind of incline for kind of LY-60 Vls short-range air defence system?

The more pictures i get of it, the more un-seaworthy i think it is....

Btw, if you measure the length of the vessal, ~21.5 cm, and the height of the people, ~0.6mm, the length of the vessal comes to ~59.2m. Judging from this, and the fact that the 38m Osa I's were ~200 tonnes, wouldn't it be fair to place this ship more in the 400 ton+ range? Although it does have a very high waterline.

 

[swimmerXC]

Re: PLAN Pic Thread 3

Varyag...., FAC (that radar is going to get blown off...)

 

[tphuang]

Re: PLAN Pic Thread 3

nice, the first time that we've seen all 4 of them together. 2208-2211 I guess. I wonder how many more of these things will be built.

 

[swimmerXC]

Re: PLAN Pic Thread 3

Varyag....

 

[swimmerXC]

Re: PLAN Pic Thread 3

Weapons