PLA Strategy in a Taiwan Contingency

BoraTas

Captain
Registered Member
I don't why you're asking me that.

I don't know how likely it is, but my point is that your dismissive attitude towards a think tank's position on US Nuclear Policy was entirely unwarranted. Think tanks have an input on policy, that's why they exist, and some of them are extremely influential. What's even more important, is that there are many people in the political-military establishment itself who think that way too.

That said, here is my assessment.

United States is unlikely to resort to nuclear weapons while it has a very powerful array of conventional options. However, in the event that United States suffers a serious, perhaps even devastating military defeat which renders it conventional options ineffective, it may very well resort to using nuclear weapons.

Human behavior is unpredictable, and I would not count on individual policy makers holding their cool no matter what. In fact, if United States loses tends of thousands of personnel, multiple ships, dozens of aircraft in a failed attempt to preserve hegemony in WESTPAC, I hypothesize that there is a very significant chance that United States may use and escalate to nuclear weapons in an attempt to even the odds. Especially because United States will likely have an escalation advantage in a nuclear exchange due to a larger arsenal and greater strategic depth.
The US did resort to the threat of massive use of tactical nuclear weapons in the cold war after balances in Europe switched to Soviet favor in the 1970s. I can't see why that policy couldn't return. It is simply a good policy if the other side is also committed to that. Especially if you aren't the one having nukes go off next to its soil. IMO China is doing the right thing by not committing to tactical/limited nuclear war. Threatening further escalation and building a larger to arsenal back that position is the correct approach.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
The US did resort to the threat of massive use of tactical nuclear weapons in the cold war after balances in Europe switched to Soviet favor in the 1970s. I can't see why that policy couldn't return. It is simply a good policy if the other side is also committed to that. Especially if you aren't the one having nukes go off next to its soil. IMO China is doing the right thing by not committing to tactical/limited nuclear war. Threatening further escalation and building a larger to arsenal back that position is the correct approach.
And China do not play that game, they simple trigger MAD in response and there is no American answer to that besides return the favor. Soviet made a lot of mistakes playing American games whereas China play the asymmetrical game. Ultimately US has little interest over strategic nuclear exchange over Taiwan which means they will lose the escalation if they play the tactical nuclear game, so either back off from using tactical nukes or go all the way.
 

davidau

Senior Member
Registered Member

Strangelove

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Why the US will lose a war with China over the Taiwan question: Pentagon whistleblower

By Global Times Published: Jun 28, 2023 07:16 PM


Editor's Note:

A war with China over the Taiwan question is a conflict that the US cannot win and should never be fought, warned Franz Gayl (Gayl), a retired Marine Corps infantry officer and Pentagon whistleblower, in his recently published book The United States will lose the coming war with China. Since May 2021, Gayl has contributed articles to Global Times (GT) criticizing the US' dangerous Taiwan policy and calling for US' rationality to avoid a war in the Taiwan Straits with China, despite being put under a counterintelligence investigation and forced to retire from his Pentagon position for writing pieces in the Chinese media outlet. Why did he choose to collect all the articles he contributed to GT so far and publish them as a book? Why is he so concerned about the US' Taiwan policy and the Taiwan Straits situation? Here is an exclusive interview between Gayl and GT reporter Yu Jincui.


GT: What inspired you to conceive the idea of publishing a book comprising all the articles you had submitted to the Global Times?

Gayl: The articles in this book remain relevant, and I feel compelled to share my insights again as relations between our countries continue to deteriorate. I care deeply about my country, especially the young men and women in the military who will dutifully carry out the orders of their civilian and military leaders. Unfortunately, all indications point to the US sleepwalking into an imminent war with China over the Taiwan question, a conflict that should never be fought.

The US' foreign policy in the region is militarized with China pigeonholed as our enemy. The public is told that encouraging Taiwan's secession while containing China regionally are somehow existential causes for the US. However, the US public is not being told that militarily intervening in China's internal sovereign affairs will lead to an unjustified total war. The US government-puppeteered media is performing censorship by selective omission, and the articles in this book attempt to fill the public awareness gaps.


GT: What influence are you expecting from this book?

Gayl: I have no expectations beyond hope, as it appears that my warnings over the years have been of no consequence. However, if new readers consider the viewpoints and perhaps share my concerns, they can still express their opinions to elected officials.

I am optimistic because, through the kind assistance of my publisher, Triumph Press, the collection is now available on
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. It is also possible that a Chinese publisher may translate and make available in China the same book. This might prompt US officials, who are normally dismissive of any Chinese positions, to read the English version.

I do not want to see American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines maimed and killed in a war fighting for a cause that the US will ultimately abandon, as what happened in Vietnam and other conflicts.

Some may argue that my motivation for publishing this book is to make money from its sales. Others may claim the book is a vanity project aimed at gaining 15 minutes of fame. Still others may suggest that I am intentionally or unintentionally serving as a tool for Chinese propaganda.

However, I want to clarify that I have not received any payment from the Chinese for my views, and all profits from the book will be donated to charities supporting US veterans. As a retired Marine and a concerned citizen, my only motivation is to alert people to a threat to America's best interests that must be prevented.



Cover of the book The United States will lose the coming war with China

Cover of the book The United States will lose the coming war with China

GT: Why have you kept calling for preventing a war between China and the US over the Taiwan question? How do you see the possibility of a war between the two sides in the Taiwan Straits?

Gayl: The possibility of war has grown. The number of military assets in the South China Sea, the Taiwan Straits, and the region have certainly increased in density. As a result, the possibility that war could be triggered by accident in congested seas and airspace has also increased. The situation has been further aggravated by the US providing more security assistance and advanced weapons sales to Taiwan, and more officials visiting the island. It appears that the US has adopted a "One China, One Taiwan" policy that could culminate in Taiwan's recognition by the US as an independent nation. A neutral observer would come to this conclusion.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently visited China, during which he reiterated decades of US policy toward Taiwan when he said the US does not support a declaration of independence by the government on that island. The Secretary's statement was carefully expressed in a fashion some refer to as "smoke and mirrors." The statement "The US does not support a declaration of independence by the government on that island" is equivalent to "The US does not discourage a declaration of independence by the government on that island." The two are the same.

Franz Gayl Photo: Courtesy of Gayl

Franz Gayl Photo: Courtesy of Gayl
GT: You accuse US decision-makers of ignoring China's well-documented historical claims to Taiwan island. Considering that the US military and diplomatic experts pride themselves on being well-read, how can they persist in this lack of awareness when there is a possibility of war?

Gayl: For the sake of peace in the Indo-Pacific it is critical that Americans read China's White Paper "The Taiwan Question and China's Reunification in the New Era." Our false history must be replaced by this authoritative history before it is too late.

Archeological and historical records show that Taiwan has belonged to China continuously since AD 230. In 1662 during the Ming Dynasty, General Zheng Chenggong led an expedition and expelled Dutch colonists from the island. Subsequently, the Qing court gradually set up more administrative bodies in Taiwan. In 1684, a Taiwan prefecture administration was set up under the jurisdiction of Fujian Province. In 1885, Taiwan's status was upgraded and it became the 20th province of China.

The centuries of continuous Chinese governance ended abruptly in 1895 when Imperial Japan defeated the Qing Dynasty in war. A militarily weak China was forced to cede governance of its island province to Japan. Taiwan's Han Chinese citizens - over 95 percent of Taiwan's population today - were then for 50 years relegated as subjects under ruthless Japanese occupation.

After the Japanese defeat in the WWII, China recovered Taiwan de jure and de facto through a host of documents with international legal effect. However, to accommodate their American protector's ambitions and protect their own interests in Asia, Japanese silence implies concurrence with a false US history of Taiwan. Fabrications include: Before Japanese occupation, Taiwan residents had never been considered Chinese. Japanese occupiers treated Taiwan residents well, and the sexual enslavement of Chinese women there is a myth. Taiwan, therefore, belonged solely to the Japanese when it was ceded to the Allies in 1945 and has been a democracy ever since.

Each lie is easily proven false. But each is repeated thereby misleading listeners to misinterpret the meaning of the comment that "Taiwan has never been a part of or governed by the PRC." The US shell game mixes truth and fiction and leads to the false public conclusion that the island has always existed as an ethnically distinct sovereign polity separate from China.

For the US and Japan, the arrangement has been useful. The US has solidified its hegemony across the vast Pacific and effectively colonized Taiwan as a military outpost. The technically capable Japanese have refrained from developing their own nuclear arsenal, instead enjoying wealth accumulation under the protection of the US nuclear umbrella.

But with WWIII on the horizon the historical record must be corrected to reflect the truth. Americans need to read China's white paper to mitigate war.


See link for entire article.
 

davidau

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Why the US will lose a war with China over the Taiwan question: Pentagon whistleblower

By Global Times Published: Jun 28, 2023 07:16 PM


Editor's Note:

A war with China over the Taiwan question is a conflict that the US cannot win and should never be fought, warned Franz Gayl (Gayl), a retired Marine Corps infantry officer and Pentagon whistleblower, in his recently published book The United States will lose the coming war with China. Since May 2021, Gayl has contributed articles to Global Times (GT) criticizing the US' dangerous Taiwan policy and calling for US' rationality to avoid a war in the Taiwan Straits with China, despite being put under a counterintelligence investigation and forced to retire from his Pentagon position for writing pieces in the Chinese media outlet. Why did he choose to collect all the articles he contributed to GT so far and publish them as a book? Why is he so concerned about the US' Taiwan policy and the Taiwan Straits situation? Here is an exclusive interview between Gayl and GT reporter Yu Jincui.


GT: What inspired you to conceive the idea of publishing a book comprising all the articles you had submitted to the Global Times?

Gayl: The articles in this book remain relevant, and I feel compelled to share my insights again as relations between our countries continue to deteriorate. I care deeply about my country, especially the young men and women in the military who will dutifully carry out the orders of their civilian and military leaders. Unfortunately, all indications point to the US sleepwalking into an imminent war with China over the Taiwan question, a conflict that should never be fought.

The US' foreign policy in the region is militarized with China pigeonholed as our enemy. The public is told that encouraging Taiwan's secession while containing China regionally are somehow existential causes for the US. However, the US public is not being told that militarily intervening in China's internal sovereign affairs will lead to an unjustified total war. The US government-puppeteered media is performing censorship by selective omission, and the articles in this book attempt to fill the public awareness gaps.


GT: What influence are you expecting from this book?

Gayl: I have no expectations beyond hope, as it appears that my warnings over the years have been of no consequence. However, if new readers consider the viewpoints and perhaps share my concerns, they can still express their opinions to elected officials.

I am optimistic because, through the kind assistance of my publisher, Triumph Press, the collection is now available on
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. It is also possible that a Chinese publisher may translate and make available in China the same book. This might prompt US officials, who are normally dismissive of any Chinese positions, to read the English version.

I do not want to see American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines maimed and killed in a war fighting for a cause that the US will ultimately abandon, as what happened in Vietnam and other conflicts.

Some may argue that my motivation for publishing this book is to make money from its sales. Others may claim the book is a vanity project aimed at gaining 15 minutes of fame. Still others may suggest that I am intentionally or unintentionally serving as a tool for Chinese propaganda.

However, I want to clarify that I have not received any payment from the Chinese for my views, and all profits from the book will be donated to charities supporting US veterans. As a retired Marine and a concerned citizen, my only motivation is to alert people to a threat to America's best interests that must be prevented.



Cover of the book The United States will lose the coming war with China

Cover of the book The United States will lose the coming war with China

GT: Why have you kept calling for preventing a war between China and the US over the Taiwan question? How do you see the possibility of a war between the two sides in the Taiwan Straits?

Gayl: The possibility of war has grown. The number of military assets in the South China Sea, the Taiwan Straits, and the region have certainly increased in density. As a result, the possibility that war could be triggered by accident in congested seas and airspace has also increased. The situation has been further aggravated by the US providing more security assistance and advanced weapons sales to Taiwan, and more officials visiting the island. It appears that the US has adopted a "One China, One Taiwan" policy that could culminate in Taiwan's recognition by the US as an independent nation. A neutral observer would come to this conclusion.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently visited China, during which he reiterated decades of US policy toward Taiwan when he said the US does not support a declaration of independence by the government on that island. The Secretary's statement was carefully expressed in a fashion some refer to as "smoke and mirrors." The statement "The US does not support a declaration of independence by the government on that island" is equivalent to "The US does not discourage a declaration of independence by the government on that island." The two are the same.

Franz Gayl Photo: Courtesy of Gayl

Franz Gayl Photo: Courtesy of Gayl
GT: You accuse US decision-makers of ignoring China's well-documented historical claims to Taiwan island. Considering that the US military and diplomatic experts pride themselves on being well-read, how can they persist in this lack of awareness when there is a possibility of war?

Gayl: For the sake of peace in the Indo-Pacific it is critical that Americans read China's White Paper "The Taiwan Question and China's Reunification in the New Era." Our false history must be replaced by this authoritative history before it is too late.

Archeological and historical records show that Taiwan has belonged to China continuously since AD 230. In 1662 during the Ming Dynasty, General Zheng Chenggong led an expedition and expelled Dutch colonists from the island. Subsequently, the Qing court gradually set up more administrative bodies in Taiwan. In 1684, a Taiwan prefecture administration was set up under the jurisdiction of Fujian Province. In 1885, Taiwan's status was upgraded and it became the 20th province of China.

The centuries of continuous Chinese governance ended abruptly in 1895 when Imperial Japan defeated the Qing Dynasty in war. A militarily weak China was forced to cede governance of its island province to Japan. Taiwan's Han Chinese citizens - over 95 percent of Taiwan's population today - were then for 50 years relegated as subjects under ruthless Japanese occupation.

After the Japanese defeat in the WWII, China recovered Taiwan de jure and de facto through a host of documents with international legal effect. However, to accommodate their American protector's ambitions and protect their own interests in Asia, Japanese silence implies concurrence with a false US history of Taiwan. Fabrications include: Before Japanese occupation, Taiwan residents had never been considered Chinese. Japanese occupiers treated Taiwan residents well, and the sexual enslavement of Chinese women there is a myth. Taiwan, therefore, belonged solely to the Japanese when it was ceded to the Allies in 1945 and has been a democracy ever since.

Each lie is easily proven false. But each is repeated thereby misleading listeners to misinterpret the meaning of the comment that "Taiwan has never been a part of or governed by the PRC." The US shell game mixes truth and fiction and leads to the false public conclusion that the island has always existed as an ethnically distinct sovereign polity separate from China.

For the US and Japan, the arrangement has been useful. The US has solidified its hegemony across the vast Pacific and effectively colonized Taiwan as a military outpost. The technically capable Japanese have refrained from developing their own nuclear arsenal, instead enjoying wealth accumulation under the protection of the US nuclear umbrella.

But with WWIII on the horizon the historical record must be corrected to reflect the truth. Americans need to read China's white paper to mitigate war.


See link for entire article.
Thanks mate, well researched. US admin should get a copy and read....but unfortunately their mindset is set in concrete, and have tunnel vision!
 

Biscuits

Major
Registered Member
Thanks mate, well researched. US admin should get a copy and read....but unfortunately their mindset is set in concrete, and have tunnel vision!
It is not tunnel vision but deliberate revanchism of history in order to accomandate the territorial ambitions of America.

The above article writer is correct in that such a war would be disastrous for America and the scores of American conscripts needed to be gathered for such a purpose. But the US government is used to no one within daring to voice opposition, so they exist in an echo chamber.
 

zhangjim

Junior Member
Registered Member
I think it's time to share some valuable content.
640.png
640 (1).png
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


A professional analysis of possible future conflicts in early June this year.
There are also many interesting contents in the paper, and interested friends can analyze them themselves.
Simple summary:

PLA has envisioned five scenarios for the possibility of conflict.
The consumption of ammunition in future wars will be enormous.
In addition, Wang Shiyi believes that the current strategy adopted by the United States is the fourth scenario: direct military intervention.
And the situation can shift towards the fifth scenario at any time, which is full-scale war.
 
Top