PLA Small arms

Jingle Bells

Junior Member
Registered Member
Based on the video, at 0:11, it is designated CS/0526.
Nice! I know it's probably unethical in a commercial sense. But I would LOVE to see the Chinese arms industry product something akin to the ACOG series. It's rugged, reliable and with a nice big field of view. Preferably with both the Tritium and battery options. I am sure there are already pretty good clones of ACOG produced in China, I am just not that familiar with them.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Nice! I know it's probably unethical in a commercial sense. But I would LOVE to see the Chinese arms industry product something akin to the ACOG series. It's rugged, reliable and with a nice big field of view. Preferably with both the Tritium and battery options. I am sure there are already pretty good clones of ACOG produced in China, I am just not that familiar with them.

The new fixed magnification optic that is equipping units with QBZ191s (and some QBZ95s) is essentially what you're describing, though lacking a battery option.

The designation from memory is QMK171.

51528827670_5e8cdf922f_o.jpg20211001_162500.jpg
 

by78

General
The designation from memory is QMK171.

View attachment 77826View attachment 77827

The designation is QMK152. QMK171 is for earlier rifles such as QBZ-95 and features a quick detach mount.

51097264498_1e3a40f130_o.jpg

51097526375_81059740f4_o.jpg
 

by78

General
It's actually odd, because on the most recent images from the airshow, the scope on the 191s has the designation QMK171A now!

51523677606_167f1b562f_o.jpg

Wow. I don't notice any obvious overt differences between QMK152 and QMK171A. I wonder if this implies any design change and/or consolidation of the product line, or whether this is merely a simplification of the naming scheme.
 

Jingle Bells

Junior Member
Registered Member
The new fixed magnification optic that is equipping units with QBZ191s (and some QBZ95s) is essentially what you're describing, though lacking a battery option.

The designation from memory is QMK171.
I don't know. I really like this CS/0526 (as pointed out by @LawLeadsToPeace). I like it a lot better than QMK171. QMK171 looks way to bulky: it looks like a bid head with a small thin neck. The ACOG look of the CS/0526 looks like a much better ergonomics and a lot more solid.
Well it's just my preference. lol
 

ohan_qwe

Junior Member
Top