I guess the PLA has made the decision not to have another bullpup?
There has been a heated debate about the whole "bullpup or conventional layout" for as long as it entered into service. Well...one of the arguments for the bullpup is it fits well into APCs especially when considering back then China was still using those super-cramp type like that of the BMP-1, but since China now getting more of those roomy ones...
And then there're all those shortcomings that plagued the QBZ95 series all these years, though to be fair a lot of it has to do with the knowledge and experiences they lacked back then, but gained over the decades. Alas, unlike quality controls, shortcomings at the design level isn't something that's easily fixed, just look at the efforts taken to fix L85A1 into L85A2...Not to mention by the time of 2010s, there are applications of conventional layouts won the world over in both reliability as well as shooting performance, seeing the mechanical operation layout the new rifle adopted, think it's the HK416 that got their attention.
That seems to be the unfortunate case, unless the keeps the QBZ-95-1 as the main service rifle to another 2-3 decades, while having tank crews, missileers, airborne forces, marines, special forces, etc. use the new carbine.
FAMAS has ceased production a decade ago and getting replaced by HK416F, L86 series never get popular, thus that leaves only the AUG series that hangs on in such resilience.
Now, it's to be seen when will the troop trial is complete and they debut the new rifle with its official designation, with that new designed magazine and optics and grenade launcher and stuff. QBZ-95-1 may still stay around for some time to come, though...crew equipment operators would most likely get the carbine, or at least the QBZ-95-1, vanilla QBZ95 to be passed to reservists and militias, Type 81 to be kept for ceremonial I presume?