PLA Next Generation Main Battle Tank

alanch90

Junior Member
Registered Member
Very strange design, it seems to have a manned turret!
Its still a 6 wheeler. But whatever it is, if real, its definitely not a Type 100.

While the hull is blurred, I don´t see crew hatches on the right side. Might this be perhaps an unmanned platform?

Another option would be this is an export tank with unmanned turret. The hull is very VT-4. And the gun looks like a 125mm.
 
Last edited:

alanch90

Junior Member
Registered Member
I refuse to believe they are going backwards with a manned turret after the type 100 hopefully it's ai
Its definetly not a manned turret but on the other hand I can´t spot hatches on the hull either. For the moment I´m inclined to believe this is a conversion of VT-4 with new powerpack and fully unmanned.
 

Tomboy

Senior Member
Registered Member
It's not a VT-4 nor ZTZ-99A as the side profile is completely different, also driver position is not central compared to the VT-4.ZTZ+99A2+China+MBT+(A).jpgvt-4_4.jpg
The place marked in red seems to be a drivers hatch
1765018732758.jpeg
 

Neurosmith

Junior Member
Registered Member
It's not a VT-4 nor ZTZ-99A as the side profile is completely different, also driver position is not central compared to the VT-4.View attachment 165863View attachment 165864
The place marked in red seems to be a drivers hatch
View attachment 165862
Good observations. However this vehicle - if not AI-generated - is definitely not the one depicted in the schematics that were posted just below. There are rumors that the Type 100 would be paired with a "heavy" MBT so perhaps this is it.
 

Nx4eu

Junior Member
Registered Member
Instead of just saying "It's AI" can people start explaining the reasoning. There is a difference between completely AI generated, and something akin to AI enhanced. I would like people to speak in full sentences, saying which pictures are AI and how. Statements like "It's AI" are not clear at all.

For example:

1765070010898.png
"This picture is AI generated because ..."

Because honestly, it's confusing and difficult to follow along to a conversation with many images and you just say it's AI.
 

peijunfei

New Member
Registered Member
Instead of just saying "It's AI" can people start explaining the reasoning. There is a difference between completely AI generated, and something akin to AI enhanced. I would like people to speak in full sentences, saying which pictures are AI and how. Statements like "It's AI" are not clear at all.

For example:

View attachment 165866
"This picture is AI generated because ..."

Because honestly, it's confusing and difficult to follow along to a conversation with many images and you just say it's AI.
to me, pla new gen tank all using new wheels and track pads, which are similar to the type-15 ones but optimized. (I was in Beijing and observed by myself). The image' pads are very weird, and the wheels are also strange to me. Secondly, the shrinkwrap of cannon, the smoke extractor part is obviously not generated well somehow....
 
Top