The more interesting bit is that the left side of the rear is "boxed" up....over seats for dismounted infantryLooks like I was right about the IFV having an "access corridor" for a dismount seat
View attachment 159794
The more interesting bit is that the left side of the rear is "boxed" up....over seats for dismounted infantryLooks like I was right about the IFV having an "access corridor" for a dismount seat
View attachment 159794
Or could be ZTQ-100?So they are going to be ZTZ-100 and ZBD-100.
It make sense sequentially if you consider the previous one is 99B. Total nonsense if you follow the year rule though.Type 100? Odd name
Yeah so why was the Type 15 named Type 15?It make sense sequentially if you consider the previous one is 99B. Total nonsense if you follow the year rule though.
ZTQ-15 followed the year-rule.Yeah so why was the Type 15 named Type 15?
ZTQ-15 followed the year-rule.
ZTZ-100 doesn't - which is unsurprising, given how the PLA naming conventions appear to have broken down across the board these past couple years.