PLA next/6th generation fighter thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
But if you can't stack back to back PL-15 isn't the long IWB a waste of space? Yeah maybe you can use it for strike roles but for A2A BVR, apart from PL-17, PL-15 is what you want to use.

Maybe they factored in the increased length for a next gen BVR missile.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Wasn't the chengdu 6th gen named 3601 on the high res photo? So J-36 should be the name right?

We have the 3101 or 31001 demonstrator/prototype before, and in the end it turns out both PLAAF and PLAN variants are named J-35/A instead of J-31. So I think for now, having them named as J-XDC and J-XDS is the safer option until more concrete/official information regarding their naming comes to light in the future.
 
Last edited:

CaribouTruth

Junior Member
Registered Member
But if you can't stack back to back PL-15 isn't the long IWB a waste of space? Yeah maybe you can use it for strike roles but for A2A BVR, apart from PL-17, PL-15 is what you want to use.

Maybe they factored in the increased length for a next gen BVR missile.
Its possible that there might be cascading storage for such missiles and the whole IWB was possibly designed for something else as its main priority eg. AShBM
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top