PLA Ground Forces news, pics and videos

Dfangsaur

Junior Member
Registered Member
161a430b85b79468740196.jpg

Soldiers assigned to a brigade of the PLA 78th Group Army conduct a combat readiness training exercise in full battle gear in northeastern China on Feb. 15 during the 2018 Spring Festival holiday.
 

Orthan

Senior Member
The PLA is currently transitioning from a heavy mechanized army to a light informationalized one and this brings a rising demand for military ground vehicles like the latest tanks and armored vehicles.
what does a "light informationalized" army mean? less and/or lighter tanks/armored vehicles? wont this put them into a disadvantage compared to its neigbours?

In the future, the regular 5X5 tanks that we are familiar with will be replaced by wheeled armored vehicles that are lighter, have better mobility and stronger combat performance

Can anyone explain why wheeled armored vehicles have better combat performance than tracked armored vehicles? they dont carry as much weight, meaning that they are underarmed and underarmoured compared to tracked vehicles
 

Orthan

Senior Member
Yes, Russia has tons of late Soviet gear, yes its resources are limited, yes there are a lot of "updated late Soviet" programs around.
Yet Russia is still the #1 nation pushing combat vehicles forward.

Perhabs this belong in the russian military thread. They have a lot of tank reserves/industries of the soviet era.USSR focused a lot in them. AFAIK it had more tanks than the rest of the world combined. Thats what i heard in 1990.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
The PLA is currently transitioning from a heavy mechanized army to a light informationalized one and this brings a rising demand for military ground vehicles like the latest tanks and armored vehicles.
what does a "light informationalized" army mean? less and/or lighter tanks/armored vehicles? wont this put them into a disadvantage compared to its neigbours?
First Who could really fight the PLA in the PRC? To the west (India) is high mountain country where heavy armor fails by being to heavy for roads and to rbbed of power by thin air. To the south is marshland and jungle where heavy armor suffers from bogging down and getting stuck in trees and mud with poor roads. to the east is the pacific where heavy armor sinks. about the only good tank land is the Gobi, and parts of the north land( Mongolia). but they run into the frozen marsh of (Russia) Siberia. Heavy armor is good if you have a good flat plains and open space to maneuver. Heavy armored units are fine if you intend to fight at home or at fixed locations. The Problem for the PLA, Where it seems to want to apply power is the Pacific. And heavy armored Divisions are hard to move across oceans.

Light can mean reduced weight armored vehicles, but it can also mean reduced sized deployment elements. Brigades and Regiments as opposed to divisions. It's easier to move less vehicles at a time.

In the future, the regular 5X5 tanks that we are familiar with will be replaced by wheeled armored vehicles that are lighter, have better mobility and stronger combat performance

Can anyone explain why wheeled armored vehicles have better combat performance than tracked armored vehicles?
That depends on where you are fighting and what you are doing. Urban terrain is the most expanding environment type on the planet followed by Desertification Cities are the Future war
zones. Tracks suffer in cities and Cities suffer from tracks. Tracks cause issues as the Track was designed to allow better off road performance in cities it almost always on road. Roads get chewed up by tracks and Tracks can be thrown on some road surfaces. if that happens the crew has to repair the track, an action demanding all of the tank crew and not something you want to do well under ambush in a city street.
by Contrast armored Wheeled vehicles have a redundancy a 8x8 armored vehicle like a Stryker can still manouver if it has been reduced to a 4x4. Wheeled vehciles are easier and faster on roads.
they don't carry as much weight, meaning that they are underarmed and underarmoured compared to tracked vehicles
Dated information. When compared to modern tracked IFV's many modern Tracked and Wheeled armored vehicles are in fact the same weight with the same armor levels with the same weapons load outs. They can also carry the same number of troops if not more.
Wheeled stand higher off the ground, which can work as both a plus and minus. A plus as in a IED event the Wheeled vehicle has some stand off space to allow more of the Blast energy to be channeled away from the hull. As a minus though it means a easier to see and target profile.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
There are different types of Grenades that do different jobs. What it looks like is not important what it does is.
Now the Grenades in question look small but that's actually about the right size for a modern hand grenade. The last known issued Fragmentation grenade for the PLA was the Type 86P which uses a plastic shell infused with metal pellets it works like a Claymore mine.
. Type86P3.jpg
In terms of pull pin go boom this is about the state of the art because like a bayonet, you can't improve it that much.
Now the new grenade is a bit different.
151946vjjekheyyyabh3bo-jpg.45621

So why are they different? well they are probably not meant for the same job. Form follows function. and grenades are not just for frag. Teargas, Smoke, Incindiary Flashbang, Antitank, Offensive, defensive, Rifle assisted.
The can shape makes me think these are Offensive grenades, Now before any one asks, a Offensive grenade is a Concussion grenade designed for minimal fragmentation. They are intended produce casualties by explosive shock especially against enemy forces inside structures. they can also be used for demolitions.
For comparison this is a Grenade that the US has been testing, the Nammo Talley Scalable Offensive Hand Grenade
SOHG.jpg
Note the can like shape and plastic looking body.
 
Top