NATO doctrine calls for complete encirclement before a hammer+anvil operation after achieving a 9:1 advantage. you post seem to suggest you know something in this area, please share.....
PLA Ground Forces news, pics and videos
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
probably belongs to somewhere in the Strategic Defense forum, but I can't manage to find a thread for it and since they published it on the pla newspaper, so I guess I'll put it here
关注“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战 (Focus on "weak level, high-intensity, strong denial" operations)
历史实践启示我们，战争在不断求变，“看不懂”的战争在不断进化。现代战争正在打破平时与战时的分野，超越时间与空间的限制，出现战争与和平的灰色地带：一个和平时期不宣而战、一个不存在打响第一枪正式宣战的新模式——“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战，已经出现在我们的视野。
“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战，主要指面向大国竞争，在暴力层级降格、大规模战争风险降级的情况下，通过综合运用认知域、物理域、信息域手段，深度融合平时信息与战时情报，运用普通民众、军队乃至雇佣军力量，聚合发动令人眼花缭乱、应接不暇、防不胜防的攻势行动，力求陷对方于认知困境、决策困境及行动困境，从而达成有效拒止对手意图、实现己方预设目标的新型作战模式。
“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战，将可能成为未来战争演进的新模式，基本表现形式为：一是暴力层级低强度。指在未来战争中一些作战对手派遣力量直接参战的可能性相对较小，其参与现场作战的意愿不高。二是方式手段高烈度。指作战对手发动战争的手法招数将更多、更频、更激烈，可能综合使用认知塑造、文化攻防、极限施压、敏感武器供给以及网络电磁暗攻、人脸识别狙杀、后方恐袭破坏等多种手段，所造成的后果可能远超直接“出兵”。三是目的效果强拒止。指通过提供政治、外交、舆论、情报等支援协作并配合“代理人”发起军事攻势，谋求达到拒止对方速决制胜、陷对方于持久消耗战及弱化对方作战信心等目的。
综合看，当作战对手实施“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战时，能够通过不直接参战的方式，实现多域空间上认知干预链、舆论慑压链、极限制裁链及火力杀伤链等多线流程闭合，从而使对方面临敌人隐藏后台无法针对发力、战场威胁来自多域多维多方向、战局难以按预期计划推进实施等问题挑战。
需要高度关注的是，“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战并非“温酒斩华雄”式的速战速决，而是“温水煮青蛙式”全方位浸透窒息作战模式，可能在酝酿中萌发，在实践中进化，在悄无声息中实现控局。
（作者单位：陆军研究院）
Historical practice has revealed to us that wars are constantly changing, and "incomprehensible" wars are constantly evolving. Modern warfare is breaking the distinction between peacetime and wartime, transcending the limitations of time and space, and a gray area of war and peace emerges: a new mode of undeclared war in peacetime, and a formal declaration of war without firing the first shot—"Low The high-intensity, high-intensity, strong-denial" operation has appeared in our field of vision.
"Low-intensity, high-intensity, and strong denial" operations mainly refer to the integration of peacetime information and information through the comprehensive use of methods in the cognitive domain, physical domain, and information domain when the level of violence is downgraded and the risk of large-scale wars is downgraded. Wartime intelligence, using the power of ordinary people, the army, and even mercenaries, aggregates and launches dazzling, overwhelming, and unpredictable offensive operations, and strives to trap the opponent in cognitive difficulties, decision-making dilemmas, and operational difficulties, so as to effectively deny the opponent's intentions and achieve A new type of combat mode with preset targets for one's own side.
"Low-intensity, high-intensity, strong denial" operations may become a new model for the evolution of future wars. The basic manifestations are as follows: First, the level of violence is low-intensity. It means that in future wars, the possibility of some combat opponents sending forces to directly participate in the war is relatively small, and their willingness to participate in on-site combat is not high. The second is the high intensity of methods and means. Refers to more, more frequent, and more intense tactics used by combat opponents to launch wars, and may use cognitive shaping, cultural offense and defense, extreme pressure, sensitive weapon supply, and network electromagnetic attacks, face recognition sniper killings, and rear terrorist attacks The consequences of various means such as sabotage may far exceed direct "sending troops". The third is that the purpose effect is strong. Refers to providing political, diplomatic, public opinion, intelligence and other support and cooperation and cooperating with "agents" to launch military offensives, seeking to achieve the goals of denying the opponent a quick victory, trapping the opponent in a protracted war of attrition, and weakening the opponent's combat confidence.
On the whole, when the combat opponent implements "low-intensity, high-intensity and strong denial" operations, it can realize the cognitive intervention chain, public opinion deterrence chain, extreme sanctions chain, and firepower killing chain in the multi-domain space without directly participating in the war. The multi-line process is closed, so that the opponent faces challenges such as the enemy's hidden background cannot be targeted, the threat of the battlefield comes from multiple domains, dimensions, and directions, and the battle situation is difficult to advance and implement as expected.
What needs to be paid close attention to is that the "low-intensity, high-intensity, and strong refusal" operation is not a quick battle of the "warm wine to kill Huaxiong" style, but a "warm water boiled frog style" full-scale soaking and suffocation combat mode, which may germinate in the brewing , evolve in practice, and realize control in silence.
(Author unit: Army Research Institute)
all of that sounds way too familiar to me, does this mean PLA showed interest to learn or even reforming part of itself using the Iran and the Hezbollah experience? I mean, for some relatively small country/organization, they seem to proven themselves to have one of the most advanced tactics right now, as well as adapting it to the local environment
PS: and no, as I can already imagine some of us might be saying, it doesn't mean that PLA will turn to worship Allah or any other weird thing people have in mind when they talk about PLA resculpting itself to adapt the modern war, no matter does the PLA in this case will or will not, I mean, we all know that Israel and US had heavy influences on the PLA back in the time, but they didn't turn themselves into Christian or anything did it? they will still be the same PLA with the same old traditions, as long as it's not in the way that much, like I said before, you need to have one of the most advanced tactics and adapting it to the local environment, simply copying the flaws and the traits of the Iran and the Hezbollah into this case does no good, those who's familiar with the history of Chinese revolution will know how much damage does that Soviet and German consultant has done to both side by simply applying the tactics they're familiar with into the Chinese battlefield (Yes sorry I know there're two German consultant and the second one did a pretty good job, but it's been way too long since my last read on them, sorry I can't remeber there names)
关注“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战 (Focus on "weak level, high-intensity, strong denial" operations)
历史实践启示我们，战争在不断求变，“看不懂”的战争在不断进化。现代战争正在打破平时与战时的分野，超越时间与空间的限制，出现战争与和平的灰色地带：一个和平时期不宣而战、一个不存在打响第一枪正式宣战的新模式——“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战，已经出现在我们的视野。
“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战，主要指面向大国竞争，在暴力层级降格、大规模战争风险降级的情况下，通过综合运用认知域、物理域、信息域手段，深度融合平时信息与战时情报，运用普通民众、军队乃至雇佣军力量，聚合发动令人眼花缭乱、应接不暇、防不胜防的攻势行动，力求陷对方于认知困境、决策困境及行动困境，从而达成有效拒止对手意图、实现己方预设目标的新型作战模式。
“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战，将可能成为未来战争演进的新模式，基本表现形式为：一是暴力层级低强度。指在未来战争中一些作战对手派遣力量直接参战的可能性相对较小，其参与现场作战的意愿不高。二是方式手段高烈度。指作战对手发动战争的手法招数将更多、更频、更激烈，可能综合使用认知塑造、文化攻防、极限施压、敏感武器供给以及网络电磁暗攻、人脸识别狙杀、后方恐袭破坏等多种手段，所造成的后果可能远超直接“出兵”。三是目的效果强拒止。指通过提供政治、外交、舆论、情报等支援协作并配合“代理人”发起军事攻势，谋求达到拒止对方速决制胜、陷对方于持久消耗战及弱化对方作战信心等目的。
综合看，当作战对手实施“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战时，能够通过不直接参战的方式，实现多域空间上认知干预链、舆论慑压链、极限制裁链及火力杀伤链等多线流程闭合，从而使对方面临敌人隐藏后台无法针对发力、战场威胁来自多域多维多方向、战局难以按预期计划推进实施等问题挑战。
需要高度关注的是，“低强度高烈度强拒止”作战并非“温酒斩华雄”式的速战速决，而是“温水煮青蛙式”全方位浸透窒息作战模式，可能在酝酿中萌发，在实践中进化，在悄无声息中实现控局。
（作者单位：陆军研究院）
Historical practice has revealed to us that wars are constantly changing, and "incomprehensible" wars are constantly evolving. Modern warfare is breaking the distinction between peacetime and wartime, transcending the limitations of time and space, and a gray area of war and peace emerges: a new mode of undeclared war in peacetime, and a formal declaration of war without firing the first shot—"Low The high-intensity, high-intensity, strong-denial" operation has appeared in our field of vision.
"Low-intensity, high-intensity, and strong denial" operations mainly refer to the integration of peacetime information and information through the comprehensive use of methods in the cognitive domain, physical domain, and information domain when the level of violence is downgraded and the risk of large-scale wars is downgraded. Wartime intelligence, using the power of ordinary people, the army, and even mercenaries, aggregates and launches dazzling, overwhelming, and unpredictable offensive operations, and strives to trap the opponent in cognitive difficulties, decision-making dilemmas, and operational difficulties, so as to effectively deny the opponent's intentions and achieve A new type of combat mode with preset targets for one's own side.
"Low-intensity, high-intensity, strong denial" operations may become a new model for the evolution of future wars. The basic manifestations are as follows: First, the level of violence is low-intensity. It means that in future wars, the possibility of some combat opponents sending forces to directly participate in the war is relatively small, and their willingness to participate in on-site combat is not high. The second is the high intensity of methods and means. Refers to more, more frequent, and more intense tactics used by combat opponents to launch wars, and may use cognitive shaping, cultural offense and defense, extreme pressure, sensitive weapon supply, and network electromagnetic attacks, face recognition sniper killings, and rear terrorist attacks The consequences of various means such as sabotage may far exceed direct "sending troops". The third is that the purpose effect is strong. Refers to providing political, diplomatic, public opinion, intelligence and other support and cooperation and cooperating with "agents" to launch military offensives, seeking to achieve the goals of denying the opponent a quick victory, trapping the opponent in a protracted war of attrition, and weakening the opponent's combat confidence.
On the whole, when the combat opponent implements "low-intensity, high-intensity and strong denial" operations, it can realize the cognitive intervention chain, public opinion deterrence chain, extreme sanctions chain, and firepower killing chain in the multi-domain space without directly participating in the war. The multi-line process is closed, so that the opponent faces challenges such as the enemy's hidden background cannot be targeted, the threat of the battlefield comes from multiple domains, dimensions, and directions, and the battle situation is difficult to advance and implement as expected.
What needs to be paid close attention to is that the "low-intensity, high-intensity, and strong refusal" operation is not a quick battle of the "warm wine to kill Huaxiong" style, but a "warm water boiled frog style" full-scale soaking and suffocation combat mode, which may germinate in the brewing , evolve in practice, and realize control in silence.
(Author unit: Army Research Institute)
all of that sounds way too familiar to me, does this mean PLA showed interest to learn or even reforming part of itself using the Iran and the Hezbollah experience? I mean, for some relatively small country/organization, they seem to proven themselves to have one of the most advanced tactics right now, as well as adapting it to the local environment
PS: and no, as I can already imagine some of us might be saying, it doesn't mean that PLA will turn to worship Allah or any other weird thing people have in mind when they talk about PLA resculpting itself to adapt the modern war, no matter does the PLA in this case will or will not, I mean, we all know that Israel and US had heavy influences on the PLA back in the time, but they didn't turn themselves into Christian or anything did it? they will still be the same PLA with the same old traditions, as long as it's not in the way that much, like I said before, you need to have one of the most advanced tactics and adapting it to the local environment, simply copying the flaws and the traits of the Iran and the Hezbollah into this case does no good, those who's familiar with the history of Chinese revolution will know how much damage does that Soviet and German consultant has done to both side by simply applying the tactics they're familiar with into the Chinese battlefield (Yes sorry I know there're two German consultant and the second one did a pretty good job, but it's been way too long since my last read on them, sorry I can't remeber there names)
by78
General
New MRAP for PLAGF?
More winning hearts and minds:
SourceEditorLin Congyi Time2023-02-06 20:28:21
The picture shows the 10th Chinese peacekeeping medical contingent to Mali providing free medical clinic.
BEIJING, Feb.6 -- At the invitation of the Sector East of the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) and the local government, the 10th Chinese peacekeeping medical contingent to Mali went to the Rand School in Gao on February 1 to provide free medical clinic.
The Chinese peacekeeping medical contingent has sent out an expert team of 16 doctors from multiple clinical disciplines, including respiration, digestion, gynecology and pediatrics, epidemic prevention, and laboratory medicine, to offer free diagnosis and treatment for teachers and students in schools against seasonal epidemics, infectious diseases, and other common and frequently-occurring diseases.
During the breaks, the Chinese expert team also visited the school hospital and carried out communication activities. The backbone doctors provided on-site teaching and technical assistance to help improve the diagnosis and treatment level of the local hospital.
And the Chinese medical contingent also donated food, medicine, health and epidemic prevention materials, as well as other school supplies, to the school on the same day.
Representatives of Rand School expressed their sincere gratitude for the clinic and donation of the Chinese peacekeeping medical contingent, and highly praised the on-site help and guidance of Chinese medical experts. Commander of the Sector East of the MINUSMA, who participated in the event, also gave his thumbs up to the Chinese medical team.
10th Chinese peacekeeping medical contingent to Mali sets up free clinic
SourceEditorLin Congyi Time2023-02-06 20:28:21
The picture shows the 10th Chinese peacekeeping medical contingent to Mali providing free medical clinic.
BEIJING, Feb.6 -- At the invitation of the Sector East of the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) and the local government, the 10th Chinese peacekeeping medical contingent to Mali went to the Rand School in Gao on February 1 to provide free medical clinic.
The Chinese peacekeeping medical contingent has sent out an expert team of 16 doctors from multiple clinical disciplines, including respiration, digestion, gynecology and pediatrics, epidemic prevention, and laboratory medicine, to offer free diagnosis and treatment for teachers and students in schools against seasonal epidemics, infectious diseases, and other common and frequently-occurring diseases.
During the breaks, the Chinese expert team also visited the school hospital and carried out communication activities. The backbone doctors provided on-site teaching and technical assistance to help improve the diagnosis and treatment level of the local hospital.
And the Chinese medical contingent also donated food, medicine, health and epidemic prevention materials, as well as other school supplies, to the school on the same day.
Representatives of Rand School expressed their sincere gratitude for the clinic and donation of the Chinese peacekeeping medical contingent, and highly praised the on-site help and guidance of Chinese medical experts. Commander of the Sector East of the MINUSMA, who participated in the event, also gave his thumbs up to the Chinese medical team.
OPFOR blue force.
In B4 Taiwan talk show hosts boast that PLA OPFOR meant to simulate ROC forces score resounding 10:1 victory against red units.
Dang. They did the ROC dirty with that sticker. They could have at least get some copies of their uniform which would enable them to get more out of their training.OPFOR blue force.
