North Korea Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Nevermore

Junior Member
Registered Member
Is this the power of the military-first policy? By concentrating national resources on military modernization, even a small, impoverished, and externally isolated country like North Korea can develop advanced modern weaponry. Of course, I know North Korea actually developed quite well in the mid-20th century, achieving relatively high levels of urbanization and industrialization.
 

sahureka

Junior Member
Registered Member
913f062a9db56d9e2a82b4517f444588d4c3aee6659d53f78625e89ad5aa5082139efa675fdbec3aee56d7a86c576f00930b40d9cb4322c2cc92eccc1b7e62def680b39ca2ce48066832c2d7dc6588e6.kcmsf
 

Racek49

New Member
Registered Member
Is this the power of the military-first policy? By concentrating national resources on military modernization, even a small, impoverished, and externally isolated country like North Korea can develop advanced modern weaponry. Of course, I know North Korea actually developed quite well in the mid-20th century, achieving relatively high levels of urbanization and industrialization.
Yes, the communists left behind well-developed energy, military, and engineering capacities everywhere. The first task of the new pro-Western governments was always to liquidate the engineering and military capacities. Without exception.
By the way, I recently read the memoirs of a commercial aircraft maintenance man, and he praised Korean civilian aircraft as being excellently maintained.
 

mack8

Senior Member
Yes, the communists left behind well-developed energy, military, and engineering capacities everywhere. The first task of the new pro-Western governments was always to liquidate the engineering and military capacities. Without exception.
By the way, I recently read the memoirs of a commercial aircraft maintenance man, and he praised Korean civilian aircraft as being excellently maintained.
I can only look at DPRK's MIC advances in the latest decades with envy, and think of Romania's situation, it's MIC had the exact fate you described once "democracy" took over. I would wager Romania's MIC of 1989 was probably more developed that DPRK's was in 1989, and can only think of the enormous lost potential since, back then we were building warships, tanks, IFVs, combat aircraft (including working on supersonic fighters), helicopters, missiles (including AAMs/ASMs) not to mention other smaller systems. The only thing we didn't built was ballistic missiles which i think DPRK already was at the time.
 

yugocrosrb95

Junior Member
Registered Member
I can only look at DPRK's MIC advances in the latest decades with envy, and think of Romania's situation, it's MIC had the exact fate you described once "democracy" took over. I would wager Romania's MIC of 1989 was probably more developed that DPRK's was in 1989, and can only think of the enormous lost potential since, back then we were building warships, tanks, IFVs, combat aircraft (including working on supersonic fighters), helicopters, missiles (including AAMs/ASMs) not to mention other smaller systems. The only thing we didn't built was ballistic missiles which i think DPRK already was at the time.
Romania had joint projects with SFRY along probably with DPRK too .
 

Valiant 1002

Junior Member
Registered Member
One recent western publication mentions among others DPRK interest in romanian aircraft (IAR-93/99?) and helicopters licence/joint production for instance.
Yes, IAR-93 and IAR-316, both deals were blocked before they could get to the final stages: both used British and French technology - both of which (obviously) did not want to sell weapons technology to North Korea.

Strange that there are no reports of them trying to arrange such a contract with the Soviet Union (before the MiG-29 license), China or any other Warsaw Pact country.

P/s: They had a deal to assemble Mi-2 helicopters under license with Poland.
 
Top